Literature DB >> 17449319

Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans.

Toshiki Tazoe1, Masanori Sakamoto, Tsuyoshi Nakajima, Takashi Endoh, Tomoyoshi Komiyama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent tonic contraction of the testing muscle modulates the effect of remote muscle contraction on motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cortical silent periods (CSPs) in resting and active proximal and distal muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In addition, we tested whether the remote effect on MEP was observable when the test MEP was small.
METHODS: While performing tonic abductions of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), flexor carpi radialis, or anterior deltoid muscles, subjects made phasic dorsiflexions of the right ankle at various forces. MEPs and CSPs were induced by separately optimized TMS intensities and locations in the left motor cortex and recorded electromyographically.
RESULTS: Phasic dorsiflexion increased MEP amplitude and shortened CSP duration in a dorsiflexion intensity-dependent manner in all muscles tested. At test MEPs <10% of Mmax, remote effects on MEP amplitude and CSP duration were significantly attenuated while the testing muscle was active.
CONCLUSIONS: Phasic contraction of remote muscles potentiates excitatory- and suppresses inhibitory intracortical neuronal pathways converging on corticospinal tract cells innervating the upper limb muscles even when they are active. However, the magnitude of the remote effect on MEP amplitude strongly depends on the test MEP amplitude. SIGNIFICANCE: Although remote effects on MEP amplitude and CSP duration are observed even when the test muscle is active, the magnitude of the remote effect strongly depends on TMS intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449319     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Mark A Rogers; George J Youssef; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Hikari Kirimoto; Makoto Suzuki; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.288

3.  Homologous muscle contraction during unilateral movement does not show a dominant effect on leg representation of the ipsilateral primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Ray-Yau Wang; Kwong-Kum Liao; Yea-Ru Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Muscle Relaxation of the Foot Reduces Corticospinal Excitability of Hand Muscles and Enhances Intracortical Inhibition.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Tetsuro Muraoka; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Kento Nakagawa; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Short-Term Plasticity in a Monosynaptic Reflex Pathway to Forearm Muscles after Continuous Robot-Assisted Passive Stepping.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Kiyotaka Kamibayashi; Taku Kitamura; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; E Paul Zehr; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Preparation and execution of teeth clenching and foot muscle contraction influence on corticospinal hand-muscle excitability.

Authors:  Naeem Komeilipoor; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Kaisa Tiippana; Martti Vainio; Mikko Tiainen; Lari Vainio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Corticospinal excitability for hand muscles during motor imagery of foot changes with imagined force level.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.