| Literature DB >> 26513357 |
Arunthia Zaidi Urmi1, Daniel T Leung2, Vanessa Wilkinson3, Mohammad Abdul Awal Miah1, Mahfuza Rahman1, Tasnim Azim4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Analysis of data from HIV testing and counseling (HTC) services provides an opportunity to identify important populations for targeting of HIV prevention efforts. Our primary aim was to describe the demographics of clients presenting to HTC in Bangladesh, a low HIV prevalence country. Our secondary aim was to determine the risk factors for HIV positivity among returning migrant workers who were tested.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26513357 PMCID: PMC4625959 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141483
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Number of clients presenting for VCT.
A) All clients by year and sex, B) Those testing positive by year and sex, C) All clients by age group and sex, and D) Those testing positive by age group and sex.
Fig 2Current location, by district, of those who tested positive for HIV at the icddr,b HCT units.
Fig 3By year of study, number of migrants and non-migrants who: A) presented for testing, and B) tested positive.
Migrant workers presenting to HTC, by geographic region of employment.
| Region of employment | Total tested from region (n, %) | HIV positive (n, %) | % positive of those tested from region |
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle East | 504 (51) | 218 (71) | 43 |
| South Asia | 177 (18) | 29 (9) | 16 |
| Southeast Asia | 125 (13) | 36 (12) | 29 |
| Europe / North America | 56 (6) | 5 (2) | 9 |
| Multiple countries | 72 (7) | 12 (4) | 17 |
| Others | 49 (5) | 7 (2) | 14 |
| Unknown | 11 (1) | 2 (1) | 0.6 |
| Total | 994 (100) | 309 (100) | 31 |
* “Others” include Japan, Korea, Australia, and Libya.
Univariate comparison of demographic characteristics and behaviours of clients with history of migrant work presenting for HTC, by HIV test outcome.
| Demographic variable | HIV negative (n = 685) | HIV positive (n = 309) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, categories, n (%) | <0.001 | ||
| 15–24 | 83 (12) | 15 (5) | |
| 25–34 | 334 (49) | 106 (34) | |
| 35–44 | 195 (28) | 146 (47) | |
| ≥45 | 73 (11) | 42 (14) | |
| Gender, female, n (%) | 122 (18) | 20 (6) | <0.001 |
| Education, n (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Illiterate | 97 (14) | 74 (24) | |
| Primary | 110 (16) | 83 (27) | |
| Secondary | 202 (30) | 114 (37) | |
| Higher secondary | 76 (11) | 27 (9) | |
| Graduate and above | 198 (30) | 10 (3) | |
| Marital status, Married, n (%) | 399 (58) | 244 (79) | <0.001 |
| Current residence in Rural area, n (%) | 140 (24) | 170 (63) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Ever worked in Middle East, n (%) | 323 (48) | 228 (74) | <0.001 |
| Duration of migrant work, n (%) | <0.001 | ||
| ≤2.0 years | 155 (23) | 16 (5) | |
| 2.1–5.0 years | 135 (20) | 50 (16) | |
| 5.1–10.0 years | 91 (13) | 57 (18) | |
| >10.0 years | 60 (9) | 89 (29) | |
| Unknown | 244 (36) | 97 (31) | |
| Spouse also migrant worker, n (%) | 86 (13) | 27 (9) | 0.08 |
*P-values were computed using logistic regression.
Independent predictors for testing positive among migrant workers presenting to HTC, by multivariable logistic regression analysis.
| Variable | Odds Ratio | [95% CI] | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age category (years): 15–24 | Ref | ||
| 25–34 | 0.72 | 0.34–1.51 | 0.38 |
| 35–44 | 0.93 | 0.42–2.05 | 0.85 |
| ≥45 | 0.53 | 0.21–1.33 | 0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Education: Illiterate | Ref | ||
| Primary | 0.72 | 0.43–1.23 | 0.23 |
| Secondary | 0.57 | 0.35–0.93 | 0.02 |
| Higher secondary | 0.50 | 0.26–0.96 | 0.04 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Married | 1.24 | 0.80–1.91 | 0.33 |
| Worked in Middle East | 1.51 | 1.04–2.19 | 0.03 |
|
| |||
| | Ref | ||
| | 3.5 | 1.8–6.7 |
|
| | 5.1 | 2.6–10.1 |
|
| | 12.2 | 6.0–24.8 |
|
| | 3.3 | 1.7–6.4 |
|
| Spouse also migrant worker | 1.18 | 0.62–2.22 | 0.62 |