| Literature DB >> 18831227 |
Tasnim Azim1, Sharful Islam Khan, Fariha Haseen, Nafisa Lira Huq, Lars Henning, Md Moshtaq Pervez, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Isabelle Sarafian.
Abstract
Bangladesh initiated an early response to the HIV epidemic starting in the mid-1980s. Since then, the response has been enhanced considerably, and many HIV-prevention interventions among the most at-risk populations and the general youth are being undertaken. Alongside prevention activities, gathering of data has been a key activity fostered by both the Government and individual development partners. This paper reviews available sources of data, including routine surveillance (HIV and behavioural among most at-risk populations), general population surveys, and various research studies with the aim to understand the dynamics of the HIV epidemic in Bangladesh. Available data show that the HIV epidemic is still at relatively low levels and is concentrated mainly among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Dhaka city. In addition, when the passively-reported cases were analyzed, another population group that appears to be especially vulnerable is migrant workers who leave their families and travel abroad for work. However, all sources of data confirm that risk behaviours that make individuals vulnerable to HIV are high--this is apparent within most at-risk populations and the general population (adult males and youth males and females). Based on the current activities and the sources of data, modelling exercises of the future of the HIV epidemic in Dhaka suggest that, if interventions are not enhanced further, Bangladesh is likely to start with an IDU-driven epidemic, similar to other neighbouring countries, which will then move to other population groups, including sex workers, males who have sex with males, clients of sex workers, and ultimately their families. This review reiterates the often repeated message that if Bangladesh wants to be an example of how to avert an HIV epidemic, it needs to act now using evidence-based programming.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18831227 PMCID: PMC2740703 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v26i3.1898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Fig. 1Number of reported HIV and AIDS cases, 1989–2007Year
Fig. 2Prevalence of HIV among male IDUs: surveillance data71.11.84.91.7441.40.620010123456781999
Baseline infection rates among a cohort of male IDUs in Dhaka
| Type of infection | All IDUs (n=561) | Area A (n=361) | Area B (n=200) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
| HIV | 33 | 5.9 | 29 | 8.0 | 4 | 2.0 |
| HCV | 375 | 66.8 | 259 | 71.7 | 116 | 58 |
| Active syphilis | 19 | 3.4 | 15 | 4.2 | 4 | 2.0 |
HCV=Hepatitis C virus; HIV=Human immunodeficiency virus; IDUs=Injecting drug users
Fig. 3Frequency of sharing needles/syringes in the last week
Sexually transmitted infections in female sex workers
| Sexually transmitted infections | Percentage positive | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brothels ( | Brothels ( | Hotels ( | Streets ( | |
| Cervical | ||||
| | 11.5 | 17.5 | 35.8 | 35.6 |
| | 13.2 | 15.5 | 43.5 | 25 |
| Vaginal | ||||
| Ever syphilis (TPHA+, RPR <1:8) | Not done | 31.5 | 8.5 | 32.6 |
| Active syphilis (TPHA+, RPR >1:8) | 5.7 | 6.6 | 4.2 | Not done |
| 35 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 45.5 | |
| HSV2 | Not done | Not done | 34.5 | 62.5 |
Fig. 4Active syphilis in male sex workers and Hijra over the round
Proportion of men who reported sex with different types of sex partners (other than wives) in the last year in different studies conducted by ICDDR, B
| Category of sex partner | Adult males 6 divisions (n=7,122) Male sexual health survey ( | Adult males (married) 6 divisions (n=4,876) Male sexual health survey ( | Adult males (married) (n=407) Migration study ( | University/college residential students, Dhaka (n=339) 4th round BSS ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex workers (%) | 9.8 | 8.6 | 15.2 | 32.7 |
| Female casual partners (%) | 8.4 | 5.3 | Not done | Not done |
| Males/ | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
*Adult males, aged 18-49 years, were enrolled from six divisions of Bangladesh—three urban (Dhaka metropolitan, Chittagong metropolitan, and Bogra town), and three rural areas (Faridpur, Rajshahi, and Cox's Bazar districts). The study was conducted during September 2004–August 2005
†Adult males, aged 15-49 years, were enrolled from Mirsarai and Abhoynagar. The study was conducted during October–December 2004
‡Adult male university/college students residing in dormitories. The surveillance was conducted in 2002; BSS=Behavioural surveillance survey
Proportion of men who reported using a condom during the last sex with different types of sex partners (other than wives) in the last year in different studies conducted by ICDDR, B
| Categories of sex partner | Adult males (all) 6 divisions | Adult males (married) 6 divisions | Adult males (married) | University/college residential students, Dhaka |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sexual health survey ( | Male sexual health survey ( | Migration study ( | 4th round BSS ( | |
| Female sex workers (%) | 40.1 | 31.5 | 6.5 | 35.3 |
| Female casual partners (%) | 30.0 | Not analyzed | Not done | Not done |
| Males/ | 8.7 | 7.2 | 0 | 18.8 |
*Adult males, aged 18-49 years, were enrolled from six divisions of Bangladesh—three urban (Dhaka metropolitan, Chittagong metropolitan, and Bogra town) and three rural areas (Faridpur, Rajshahi, and Cox's Bazar districts). The study was conducted during September 2004–August 2005
†Adult males, aged 15-49 years, were enrolled from Mirsarai and Abhoynagar. The study was conducted during October-December 2004
‡Adult male university/college students residing in dormitories. The surveillance was conducted in 2002; BSS=Behavioural surveillance survey
Rates of sexually transmitted infection in the general population
| Sexually transmitted infections | Data from studies conducted among different populations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bogaerts ( | Hawkes ( | Sabin ( | Bogaerts ( | Hawkes ( | |||
| Female, Dhaka | Male, Matlab | Female (married), Matlab | Male, Dhaka | Female, Dhaka | |||
| 0.5 | Not done | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
| 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 | |
| Ever syphilis (TPHA+, RPR-) | Not done | Not done | Not done | 2.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 | Not done |
| Active syphilis (TPHA+, RPR+) | Not done | 0.5 | 0.7 | 9.3 | 4.4 | Not done | 0.9 |
| 2.0 | 0.8 | Not done | Not done | Not done | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
| HSV2 | Not done | 5.6 | 6.0 | Not done | Not done | 12.0 | Not done |
Fig. 5Proportion of men who had sex with a female sex worker
Fig. 6Proportion of married women who reported extramarital sex
Fig. 7Violence against sex workers and Hijra (12)