Marie Préau1, Dominic Beaulieu-Prévost2, Emilie Henry3, Adeline Bernier4, Ludivine Veillette-Bourbeau5, Joanne Otis5. 1. Social Psychology Research Group, Institute of Psychology, University of Lyon 2, Bron, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France. 2. Département de sexologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada. 3. Coalition Internationale Sida, Pantin, France. 4. Coalition Internationale Sida, Pantin, France. Electronic address: abernier@coalitionplus.org. 5. CReCES, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada.
Abstract
RATIONALE: HIV serostatus disclosure is a complex challenge for persons living with HIV (PLHIV). Despite its beneficial effects, it can also lead to stigmatization and rejection. The current lack of multi-dimensional measurement tools impede an in-depth understanding of the dynamic of disclosure. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate complex measures of serostatus disclosure. METHODS: This international community based research study was performed by joint research teams (researchers/community based organizations (CBO)) in five countries (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Mali, Morocco and Romania). A convenience sample of 1500 people living with HIV (PLHIV) in contact with local CBO were recruited in 2011 (300 in each country). Face-to-face interviews were performed using a 125-item questionnaire covering HIV status disclosure to 23 potential disclosure targets and related issues (including personal history with HIV, people's reaction to disclosure, sexuality). A principal component analysis and a hierarchical cluster analysis were performed, in order to identify the main components of HIV disclosure, create measures and classify participants into profiles. RESULTS: Patterns of disclosure were summarized using two main measures: direct and indirect disclosure. Disclosure to sexual partners, whether steady or not, was different from patterns of disclosure to other targets. Among the participants, three profiles emerged - labelled Restricted disclosure, Mainly indirect disclosure and Mainly direct disclosure, respectively representing 61%, 13% and 26% of the total sample. The profiles were associated with different aspects of PLHIV's lives, including self-efficacy, functional limitations and social exclusion. Patterns varied across the five studied countries. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that multi-dimensional constructs should be used to measure disclosure in order to improve understanding of the disclosure process.
RATIONALE: HIV serostatus disclosure is a complex challenge for persons living with HIV (PLHIV). Despite its beneficial effects, it can also lead to stigmatization and rejection. The current lack of multi-dimensional measurement tools impede an in-depth understanding of the dynamic of disclosure. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate complex measures of serostatus disclosure. METHODS: This international community based research study was performed by joint research teams (researchers/community based organizations (CBO)) in five countries (Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Mali, Morocco and Romania). A convenience sample of 1500 people living with HIV (PLHIV) in contact with local CBO were recruited in 2011 (300 in each country). Face-to-face interviews were performed using a 125-item questionnaire covering HIV status disclosure to 23 potential disclosure targets and related issues (including personal history with HIV, people's reaction to disclosure, sexuality). A principal component analysis and a hierarchical cluster analysis were performed, in order to identify the main components of HIV disclosure, create measures and classify participants into profiles. RESULTS: Patterns of disclosure were summarized using two main measures: direct and indirect disclosure. Disclosure to sexual partners, whether steady or not, was different from patterns of disclosure to other targets. Among the participants, three profiles emerged - labelled Restricted disclosure, Mainly indirect disclosure and Mainly direct disclosure, respectively representing 61%, 13% and 26% of the total sample. The profiles were associated with different aspects of PLHIV's lives, including self-efficacy, functional limitations and social exclusion. Patterns varied across the five studied countries. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that multi-dimensional constructs should be used to measure disclosure in order to improve understanding of the disclosure process.
Authors: Abdulwasiu B Tiamiyu; John Lawlor; Fengming Hu; Afoke Kokogho; Manhattan E Charurat; Charles Ekeh; Merlin L Robb; Sylvia Adebajo; George Eluwa; Julie A Ake; Stefan D Baral; Rebecca G Nowak; Trevor A Crowell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 3.295