| Literature DB >> 26512185 |
Kiyotaka Hasegawa1, Rumiko Fujiwara1, Kiyoshi Sato1, Jaeyoung Shin2, Sang Jin Kim2, Misun Kim3, Hee Young Kang3.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26512185 PMCID: PMC4622905 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.5.626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Dermatol ISSN: 1013-9087 Impact factor: 1.444
Fig. 1Immunostaining with an antibody against keratinocyte growth factor (KGF). Significant amount of KGF protein was accumulated in the epidermis of lesional skin compared to that in perilesional normal skin of (A) solar lentigines and (B) melasma (A, B: ×400).
Fig. 2Quantitative analysis of immunostaining. Immunohistochemical analysis for keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) was quantified in two ways: the stained area per epidermal area (SA/EA) (A) and the stained area per single rate ridge length (SA/1R) (B). Each measurement was taken under constant magnification. For each frame, the tracing was repeated three times, and the mean±standard deviation was used for evaluation. The image was analyzed by using Image Pro Plus ver. 4.5 (Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA). Comparisons of SA/EA and SA/1R between lesional and perilesional normal skin were done by using two-sided paired Student's t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS ver. 11.0 statistical program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the analysis. White bar: perilesional normal skin, black bar: lesional skin. Statistically significant differences: *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.