| Literature DB >> 26511835 |
Ala Muala1, Gregory Rankin1, Maria Sehlstedt1, Jon Unosson1, Jenny A Bosson1, Annelie Behndig1, Jamshid Pourazar1, Robin Nyström2, Esbjörn Pettersson2, Christoffer Bergvall3, Roger Westerholm3, Pasi I Jalava4, Mikko S Happo4, Oskari Uski4, Maija-Riitta Hirvonen4, Frank J Kelly5, Ian S Mudway5, Anders Blomberg1, Christoffer Boman2, Thomas Sandström6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoke from combustion of biomass fuels is a major risk factor for respiratory disease, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether exposure to wood smoke from incomplete combustion would elicit airway inflammation in humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26511835 PMCID: PMC4625445 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-015-0111-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Exposure characteristics
| Unit | Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| PM1 mass conc. (TEOM) | μg/m3 | 314 ± 38 |
| PM1 mass conc. (filter) | μg/m3 | 294 ± 36 |
| CO | ppm | 25 ± 6 |
| NOx | ppm | 0.41 ± 0.12 |
| EC/TC (elemental/total carbon) | 0.72 ± 0.08 | |
| Organic fraction of total PM1 | % | 24 ± 8 |
| Soot fraction of total PM1 | % | 38 ± 9.9 |
| PAH-PM associated | μg/m3 | 0.78 ± 0.56 |
| PAH-semi-volatile | μg/m3 | 0.28 ± 0.12 |
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical staining of bronchial mucosal biopsies. All photos have been taken at the same magnification (×40). Bar represents 50 μm. in order from the top and downwards the four panels demonstrate: a/ A significant increase in submucosal and b/ epithelial CD3+ lymphocytes (p < 0.01 and <0.05 respectively), together with c/CD8+ cells in the epithelium (p < 0.05) after exposure to wood smoke vs. filtered air. Panel d/ displays that mast cells were significantly increased in the submucosa (p < 0.05) after wood smoke exposure. There was no neutrophilic infiltration in the bronchial biopsies (data not shown)
Bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage cell data from experimental exposure of 13 healthy subjects to filtered air and wood smoke. Data are given as medians with interquartile range
| Cells 104/ml | BW | P-value | BAL | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air | Wood smoke | Air vs. Wood smoke | Air | Wood smoke | Air vs. Wood smoke | |
| Macrophages | 6.1 | 3.95 | 0.009 | 8.50 | 9.25 | 0.60 |
| 4.48–12.56 | 2.60–6.07 | 8.21–10.05 | 7.31–12.07 | |||
| Neutrophils | 3.05 | 1.19 | 0.046 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.861 |
| 2.42–6.18 | 0.76–2.72 | 0.11–0.38 | 0.05–0.41 | |||
| Lymphocytes | 0.45 | 0.26 | 0.023 | 2.09 | 1.62 | 0.004 |
| 0.21–0.98 | 0.07–0.31 | 1.39–2.89 | 1.16–1.97 | |||
| Mast cells | 0.009 | 0.0046 | 0.061 | 0.0047 | 0.01 | 0.82 |
| 0.002–0.29 | 0.0018–0.0089 | 0.00–0.024 | 0.0024–0.016 | |||
| Eosinophils | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.345 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.441 |
| 0.00–0.01 | 0.00–0.2 | 0.00–0.01 | 0.00–0.03 | |||
Soluble components in bronchial wash and bronchoalveolar lavage from experimental exposure of 13 healthy subjects to filtered air and wood smoke. Data are given as medians with interquartile range
| Inflammatory markers | BW | P-value | BAL | P-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air | Wood smoke | Air vs. Wood smoke | Air | Wood smoke | Air vs. Wood smoke | |
| IL6 pg/ml | 4.08 | 3.96 | 0.646 | 1.13 | 1.61 | 0.515 |
| 2.25–7.25 | 3.14–5.87 | 0.79–1.91 | 0.73–2.15 | |||
| sICAM-1 ng/ml | 35.20 | 18.30 | 0.028 | 100.45 | 98.10 | 0.878 |
| 18.75–45.87 | 16.72–26.90 | 53.10–163.22 | 67.52–126.00 | |||
| CC16 ng/ml | 582.70 | 566.60 | 0.239 | 328.80 | 382.60 | 0.196 |
| 542.45–724.75 | 556.45–616.10 | 298.15–438.00 | 313.05–488.50 | |||
| GrzA pg/ml | 346.00 | 242.50 | 0.221 | 149.60 | 113.60 | 0.753 |
| 178.65–661.95 | 197.20–266.15 | 45.35–232.80 | 62.30–197.20 | |||
| MPO ng/ml | 26.50 | 17.80 | 0.019 | 2.40 | 2.10 | 0.666 |
| 8.05–70.10 | 8.30–32.65 | 0.90–5.60 | 1.05–3.40 | |||
| MMP9 ng/ml | 13.40 | 6.60 | 0.006 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.726 |
| 5.55–30.05 | 3.65–11.20 | 0.40–1.95 | 0.20–1.90 | |||
| GSx μmol/L | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.133 | 0.63 | 0.99 | 0.013 |
| 0.42–1.20 | 0.58–2.75 | 0.47–1.02 | 0.58–1.48 | |||
| GSH μmol/L | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.173 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.064 |
| 0.32–0.95 | 0.41–2.33 | 0.27–0.81 | 0.48–1.13 | |||
| GSSG μmol/L | 0.10 | O.21 | 0.279 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.196 |
| 0.02–0.19 | 0.05–0.23 | 0.00–0.13 | 0.02–0.22 | |||
Fig. 2Spearman’s rank correlations between the number concentration of neutrophils in BW and the amount of MPO, as well as MMP-9, obtained after wood smoke exposure
Flow cytometry data on lymphocyte subsets in bronchoalveolar lavage from experimental exposure of 13 healthy subjects to filtered air and wood smoke. Data are given as medians with interquartile range
| Filtered air | Wood smoke | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Air vs. Wood smoke | |||
| CD3+ ×104/ ml | 1.80 | 1.25 | 0.006 |
| 1.17–1.34 | 0.98–1.75 | ||
| CD4+ ×104/ ml | 1.02 | 0.74 | 0.006 |
| 0.78–1.34 | 0.52–0.98 | ||
| CD8+ ×104/ ml | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.013 |
| 0.37–0.94 | 0.24–0.75 | ||
| CD16+CD56+ ×103/ml | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.055 |
| 0.49–1.18 | 0.36–0.64 | ||
| CD4+CD25+ ×103/ml | 0.9 | 0.68 | 0.016 |
| 0.77–1.41 | 0.58–0.97 | ||
| CD4+HLADR+ ×103/ ml | 1.44 | 1.16 | 0.023 |
| 0.96–2.89 | 0.67–1.81 | ||
| CD8+HLADR+ ×103/ml | 1.48 | 1.07 | 0.087 |
| 0.63–1.82 | 0.37–1.68 | ||
| CD8+CD314+ ×103/ml | 2.15 | 1.32 | 0.033 |
| 1.18–3.17 | 0.73–2.56 |
Flow cytometry data of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets after exposure to filtered air and wood smoke in 14 healthy subjects. Data are given as medians with interquartile ranges
| Cell × 106/ml | Filtered air | Wood smoke | Filtered air vs. wood smoke |
|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | |||
| CD3+ | 1.39 | 1.43 | 0.064 |
| 1.12–1.98 | 1.19–2.38 | ||
| CD4+ | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.140 |
| 0.67–1.16 | 0.60–1.21 | ||
| CD8+ | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.140 |
| 0.35–0.73 | 0.40–0.83 | ||
| CD3-CD16+CD56+ | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.026 |
| 0.09–0.20. | 0.13–0.25 | ||
| CD4+HLADR+ | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.004 |
| 0.02–0.05 | 0.03–0.05 | ||
| CD8+HLADR+ | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.009 |
| 0.04–0.14 | 0.05–0.17 |
Fig. 3In-vitro data on a Cell metabolic activity, b percent of propidium iodide (PI) positive cells, c percent of subG1 cells and d olive tail moment (OTM) in RAW264.7 macrophages after exposure for 24 h to four doses (15, 50, 150 and 300 μg ml−1) of cell medium suspended particles collected from a wood log combustion. Each whisker represents the standard error of the mean (SEM). The asterisks (*) indicate a statistically significant difference from control cells (p < 0.05, Dunnett’s test or Mann–Whitney U -test)