| Literature DB >> 26511496 |
Nathanael A Ellis1, Ryan N Douglas2, Caroline E Jackson1, James A Birchler2, R Kelly Dawe3.
Abstract
The maize B centromere has been used as a model for centromere epigenetics and as the basis for building artificial chromosomes. However, there are no sequence resources for this important centromere. Here we used transposon display for the centromere-specific retroelement CRM2 to identify a collection of 40 sequence tags that flank CRM2 insertion points on the B chromosome. These were confirmed to lie within the centromere by assaying deletion breakpoints from centromere misdivision derivatives (intracentromere breakages caused by centromere fission). Markers were grouped together on the basis of their association with other markers in the misdivision series and assembled into a pseudocontig containing 10.1 kb of sequence. To identify sequences that interact directly with centromere proteins, we carried out chromatin immunoprecipitation using antibodies to centromeric histone H3 (CENH3), a defining feature of functional centromeric sequences. The CENH3 chromatin immunoprecipitation map was interpreted relative to the known transmission rates of centromere misdivision derivatives to identify a centromere core domain spanning 33 markers. A subset of seven markers was mapped in additional B centromere misdivision derivatives with the use of unique primer pairs. A derivative previously shown to have no canonical centromere sequences (Telo3-3) lacks these core markers. Our results provide a molecular map of the B chromosome centromere and identify key sequences within the map that interact directly with centromeric histone H3.Entities:
Keywords: B chromosome; centromere; maize; misdivision; retroelement
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26511496 PMCID: PMC4683656 DOI: 10.1534/g3.115.022889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
CRM2-TD markers mapped to misdivision derivatives
| CRM2 TD Markers | TD | TB-9Sb | PI | Telo 2-1(-) | Iso3(-) | Telo 2-2(-) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM2-ACC-CCA-AGA-ATA-196 | TD1 | + | − | − | − | − |
| CRM2-CCA-375 | TD2 | + | − | − | − | − |
| CRM2-CCC-280 | TD3 | + | − | − | − | − |
| CRM2-CCC-TCC-342 | TD4 | + | − | − | − | − |
| CRM2-GGA-GAC-405 | TD5 | + | − | − | − | − |
| CRM2-TAT-GAT-CTT-173 | TD6 | + | + | − | − | − |
| + | + | + | − | − | ||
| CRM2-TCC-310* | TD8 | + | + | + | + | − |
| + | + | + | + | − | ||
| + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CRM2-CTA-CTG-GTA-247 | TD11 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-CTG-389 | TD12 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-GAT-228 | TD13 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-GTC-188 | TD14 | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CRM2-AGC-GGC-257 | TD16 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-AGC-GGC-GAC-382* | TD17 | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CRM2-TAT-161 | TD19 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-TCC-345 | TD20 | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CRM2-AGA-138 | TD22 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-AGA-AGG-GGA-TCG-207 | TD23 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-ATC-TCA-220 | TD24 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-CAG-335 | TD25 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-CAT-AGT-227 | TD26 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-CGA-361 | TD27 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-CTC-199 | TD28 | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | ||
| CRM2-GGG-186 | TD30 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-GGG-298 | TD31 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-TAC-140 | TD32 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-TAT-CAT-159 | TD33 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-TCC-350 | TD34 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-AAT-GAT-208 | TD35 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-AGC-CAG-CCG-275 | TD36 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-ATG-298 | TD37 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-GAC-AGC-AGT-CGT-ATT-AAT-185 | TD38 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-GTC-247 | TD39 | + | + | + | + | + |
| CRM2-AGG-328* | TD40 | + | + | + | + | + |
Marker names include all the selective base pairs that amplified the sequence. TD indicates the pseudonym for each marker. Presence or absence of the band is noted by a “+” or “−“. Markers noted by an asterisk also were converted to simple polymerase chain reaction markers, and those in bold interact with CENH3 by ChIP-seq.
Figure 1Radio- and fluorescence-labeled transposon display (TD) of CRM2. These data were acquired with the selective bases AGC on the adapter primer. Lanes are labeled with B+ (carrying multiple copies of the B chromosome), B− (control line without B chromosomes), and L (ladder). (A) Fluorescence-labeled TD. Digital data were converted to a pseudogel format with GeneMarker software. Arrows indicate bands that were chosen sequencing. (B) The same adapter primers used in A were 33P-labeled for TD, and the results separated by polyacrylamide gel eletrophoresis and exposed to film. The film was placed back onto the gel, and a blade used to cut through the film and gel; the gel slice was then used for reamplification polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2Pedigree of the misdivision lines used. All derivatives were derived from TB-9Sb, which gave rise to the pseudoisochromosome (PI). Two second-generation derivatives [(Telo2-1(-) and Telo2-2(-)] were derived from PI. We also studied two third-generation derivatives [(Iso3(-) and Telo3-3(-)] and one fourth-generation derivative [Telo4-11(-)].
Figure 3Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmation of transposon display (TD) marker patterns. Upper image shows the amplification of CRM2-AGG-328 (TD40) in the lines studied here using unique junction-junction primers. All lanes were from the same gel (regions where lanes were removed are indicated by white lines). Lower table shows the results from amplifying all seven junction-junction PCR primer pairs. Telo3-3(-) and Telo4-11(-) were not assayed by TD and only assayed using junction-junction markers.
Figure 4CENH3 ChIP-seq reads aligned to the B73 genome and B centromere minimal map. In all three panels, the first bar shows an alignment to fragmented B73 DNA as a negative control. The second row shows the results of ChIP-seq using B73 tissue, which does not contain B chromosomes. The third and fourth rows show the results from two technical replicates of a plant carrying 9Bic-1, a B chromosome variant with an inactive centromere. The last three rows show ChIP-seq results from three different samples of plants carrying TB-9Sb. (A) Alignment to B73 chromosome 2 showing the centromere position as a single sharp peak. The total length of chromosome 2 is 237 Mb. (B) Alignment to the B centromere minimal map with each marker shown and numbered below. Markers are separated by 200 Ns such that the total length of the sequence shown is 17,900 bp. (C) Enlarged images of the ChIP-seq distributions over the seven markers that interact specifically with CENH3. The repeats within the markers are also indicated.