Literature DB >> 26510936

Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long-lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears.

Pauline L Kamath1, Mark A Haroldson1, Gordon Luikart2, David Paetkau3, Craig Whitman1, Frank T van Manen1.   

Abstract

Effective population size (N(e)) is a key parameter for monitoring the genetic health of threatened populations because it reflects a population's evolutionary potential and risk of extinction due to genetic stochasticity. However, its application to wildlife monitoring has been limited because it is difficult to measure in natural populations. The isolated and well-studied population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem provides a rare opportunity to examine the usefulness of different N(e) estimators for monitoring. We genotyped 729 Yellowstone grizzly bears using 20 microsatellites and applied three single-sample estimators to examine contemporary trends in generation interval (GI), effective number of breeders (N(b)) and N(e) during 1982-2007. We also used multisample methods to estimate variance (N(eV)) and inbreeding N(e) (N(eI)). Single-sample estimates revealed positive trajectories, with over a fourfold increase in N(e) (≈100 to 450) and near doubling of the GI (≈8 to 14) from the 1980s to 2000s. N(eV) (240-319) and N(eI) (256) were comparable with the harmonic mean single-sample N(e) (213) over the time period. Reanalysing historical data, we found N(eV) increased from ≈80 in the 1910s-1960s to ≈280 in the contemporary population. The estimated ratio of effective to total census size (N(e) /N(c)) was stable and high (0.42-0.66) compared to previous brown bear studies. These results support independent demographic evidence for Yellowstone grizzly bear population growth since the 1980s. They further demonstrate how genetic monitoring of N(e) can complement demographic-based monitoring of N(c) and vital rates, providing a valuable tool for wildlife managers.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ne/Nc ratio; conservation genetics; effective number of breeders; effective population size; population size; wildlife management

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26510936     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  11 in total

Review 1.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Long-term effective population size dynamics of an intensively monitored vertebrate population.

Authors:  A-K Mueller; N Chakarov; O Krüger; J I Hoffman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Demographic mechanisms underpinning genetic assimilation of remnant groups of a large carnivore.

Authors:  Nate Mikle; Tabitha A Graves; Ryan Kovach; Katherine C Kendall; Amy C Macleod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Reliable effective number of breeders/adult census size ratios in seasonal-breeding species: Opportunity for integrative demographic inferences based on capture-mark-recapture data and multilocus genotypes.

Authors:  Gregorio Sánchez-Montes; Jinliang Wang; Arturo H Ariño; José Luis Vizmanos; Iñigo Martínez-Solano
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Genetic substructure and admixture as important factors in linkage disequilibrium-based estimation of effective number of breeders in recovering wildlife populations.

Authors:  Alexander Kopatz; Hans Geir Eiken; Julia Schregel; Jouni Aspi; Ilpo Kojola; Snorre B Hagen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Using multiple data types and integrated population models to improve our knowledge of apex predator population dynamics.

Authors:  Florent Bled; Jerrold L Belant; Lawrence J Van Daele; Nathan Svoboda; David Gustine; Grant Hilderbrand; Victor G Barnes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Population Genomics Training for the Next Generation of Conservation Geneticists: ConGen 2018 Workshop.

Authors:  Amanda Stahlke; Donavan Bell; Tashi Dhendup; Brooke Kern; Samuel Pannoni; Zachary Robinson; Jeffrey Strait; Seth Smith; Brian K Hand; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Relationship between effective and demographic population size in continuously distributed populations.

Authors:  Jennifer C Pierson; Tabitha A Graves; Sam C Banks; Katherine C Kendall; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-05-20       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Conservation Genetic Assessment of Savannah Elephants (Loxodonta africana) in the Greater Kruger Biosphere, South Africa.

Authors:  Teresa L Santos; Carlos Fernandes; Michelle D Henley; Deborah A Dawson; Hannah S Mumby
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Measures of effective population size in sea otters reveal special considerations for wide-ranging species.

Authors:  Roderick B Gagne; M Timothy Tinker; Kyle D Gustafson; Katherine Ralls; Shawn Larson; L Max Tarjan; Melissa A Miller; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.