| Literature DB >> 26509076 |
Xiaoguang Cao1, Xianru Hou1, Yongzhen Bao1.
Abstract
Aims. To describe and explore the distribution of ocular biometric parameters of adult cataract patients in rural China. Methods. Three Lifeline Express Hospital Eye-Train missions of Peking University People's Hospital in China were chosen. 3828 adult cataract patients aged 29 to 88 years with axial length (AL) less than 27.0 mm were enrolled. The ocular biometry including visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure, AL, corneal power (K1 and K2), and corneal endothelial counting (CEC) were collected and analysis. Corneal radius (CR) was calculated from the corneal power. Results. The participants in Zhoukou of these three missions had the worse preoperative VA (p < 0.001), the lowest K1 (p < 0.001), K2 (p < 0.001), and K (p < 0.001) and the highest |K1 - K2| (p < 0.001), moreover AL/CR more closely to 3.0. The AL, |K1 - K2|, and AL/CR were normally distributed. But the K1, K2, K, and CEC were not normal distributions. Except K1, all parameters were positively skewed and peaked. Conclusion. Our study provides normative ocular biometry in a large, representative rural Chinese population. The AL is normally distributed with a positive skew and big kurtosis. The corneal powers are not normal distribution. The corneal astigmatism might have a significant effect on the visual acuity.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26509076 PMCID: PMC4609820 DOI: 10.1155/2015/171564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
CSR of China 2010.
| Province | Population | Cataract surgeries | Charge-free cataract | CSR | Charge-free CSR | Ratio of charge-free cataract |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 19,612,368 | 11961 | 1402 | 610 | 71 | 11.72% |
| Shanxi | 35,712,101 | 15902 | 4929 | 445 | 138 | 31.00% |
| Henan | 94,029,939 | 36935 | 9915 | 393 | 105 | 26.84% |
CSR: cataract surgical rate.
Demographic characteristics of the three groups.
| Zhoukou ( | Yuncheng ( | Sanmenxia ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 69.20 ± 8.10 | 69.73 ± 7.84 | 69.49 ± 8.20 | 0.293 |
|
| ||||
| Sex | 355/636 | 502/838 | 562/935 | 0.640 |
|
| ||||
| Eye operated on | 538/453 | 697/643 | 749/748 | 0.113 |
p values were calculated with ANOVA.
Biological parameters of the three groups.
| Zhoukou | Yuncheng | Sanmenxia | Total |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative visual acuity | LogMAR | 1.20 ± 0.38 | 0.95 ± 0.37 | 0.63 ± 0.43 | 0.87 ± 0.46 | 0.000 |
| Less than 6/60 | 763 | 653 | 636 | 2052 | 0.000 | |
| Equal to or better than 6/60 and less than 6/18 | 218 | 565 | 710 | 1493 | 0.000 | |
| Equal to or better than 6/18 | 10 | 122 | 151 | 283 | 0.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| Preoperative IOP (mmHg) | 14.53 ± 3.44 | 13.98 ± 2.92 | 14.78 ± 3.11 | 14.44 ± 3.15 | 0.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| Corneal curvature (D) |
| 43.40 ± 1.65 | 43.89 ± 1.68 | 43.82 ± 1.56 | 43.74 ± 1.64 | 0.000 |
|
| 44.59 ± 1.79 | 44.88 ± 1.70 | 44.75 ± 1.57 | 44.75 ± 1.68 | 0.000 | |
| | | 1.20 ± 1.03 | 0.98 ± 0.81 | 0.93 ± 0.76 | 1.02 ± 0.86 | 0.000 | |
| Average corneal power ( | 44.00 ± 1.64 | 44.38 ± 1.64 | 44.29 ± 1.52 | 44.24 ± 1.60 | 0.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| Axial length (AL) (mm) | 22.95 ± 1.05 | 23.17 ± 0.95 | 23.12 ± 0.92 | 23.04 ± 1.49 | 0.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| AL/CR | 2.99 ± 0.14 | 3.04 ± 0.12 | 3.03 ± 0.11 | 3.03 ± 0.12 | 0.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| CEC ( |
| 2505.63 ± 431.98 | 2445.24 ± 419.23 | 2462.36 ± 423.65 | 0.003 | |
p values were calculated with ANOVA or chi-square test.
LEHET was equipped with Specular Microscope, SP-3000P, in the first half of year 2012; the patients of Zhoukou and part of Yuncheng had no CEC measurement.
Biological parameters for males of the three groups.
| Zhoukou | Yuncheng | Sanmenxia | Total |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative visual acuity (LogMAR) | 1.21 ± 0.38 | 0.98 ± 0.36 | 0.66 ± 0.44 | 0.89 ± 0.46 | 0.000 |
| Preoperative IOL (mmHg) | 14.28 ± 3.46 | 13.69 ± 2.87 | 14.50 ± 3.18 | 14.16 ± 3.17 | 0.000 |
| Corneal curvature (D) | |||||
|
| 42.80 ± 1.52 | 43.37 ± 1.64 | 43.31 ± 1.44 | 43.20 ± 1.55 | 0.000 |
|
| 43.86 ± 1.50 | 44.27 ± 1.64 | 44.19 ± 1.45 | 44.13 ± 1.54 | 0.000 |
| | | 1.07 ± 0.85 | 0.91 ± 0.80 | 0.87 ± 0.66 | 0.94 ± 0.77 | 0.001 |
| Average corneal power ( | 43.33 ± 1.45 | 43.82 ± 1.59 | 43.75 ± 1.41 | 43.67 ± 1.49 | 0.000 |
| Axial length (AL) (mm) | 23.12 ± 0.90 | 23.44 ± 0.89 | 23.46 ± 0.88 | 23.37 ± 0.90 | 0.000 |
| AL/CR | 2.97 ± 0.12 | 3.04 ± 0.11 | 3.04 ± 0.11 | 3.02 ± 0.11 | 0.000 |
| CEC ( |
| 2537.49 ± 450.38 | 2437.86 ± 439.39 | 2467.32 ± 444.71 | 0.004 |
p values were calculated with ANOVA.
LEHET was equipped with Specular Microscope, SP-3000P, in the first half of year 2012; the patients of Zhoukou and part of Yuncheng had no CEC measurement.
Biological parameters for females of the three groups.
| Zhoukou | Yuncheng | Sanmenxia | Total |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative visual acuity (LogMAR) | 1.19 ± 0.38 | 0.93 ± 0.37 | 0.61 ± 0.42 | 0.85 ± 0.46 | 0.000 |
| Preoperative IOL (mmHg) | 14.67 ± 3.43 | 14.17 ± 2.93 | 14.95 ± 3.06 | 14.60 ± 3.13 | 0.000 |
| Corneal curvature (D) | |||||
|
| 43.74 ± 1.63 | 44.20 ± 1.63 | 44.13 ± 1.54 | 44.05 ± 1.61 | 0.000 |
|
| 45.00 ± 1.81 | 45.24 ± 1.63 | 45.09 ± 1.54 | 45.12 ± 1.65 | 0.016 |
| | | 1.27 ± 1.11 | 1.02 ± 0.82 | 0.96 ± 0.81 | 1.06 ± 0.91 | 0.000 |
| Average corneal power ( | 44.37 ± 1.63 | 44.72 ± 1.58 | 44.61 ± 1.49 | 44.58 ± 1.56 | 0.000 |
| Axial length (AL) (mm) | 22.86 ± 1.11 | 23.01 ± 0.96 | 22.91 ± 0.88 | 22.93 ± 0.97 | 0.008 |
| AL/CR | 3.00 ± 0.15 | 3.05 ± 0.12 | 3.03 ± 0.11 | 3.03 ± 1.29 | 0.000 |
| CEC ( |
| 2484.59 ± 418.72 | 2449.66 ± 406.84 | 2459.30 ± 410.29 | 0.174 |
p values were calculated with ANOVA.
LEHET was equipped with Specular Microscope, SP-3000P, in the first half of year 2012; the patients of Zhoukou and part of Yuncheng had no CEC measurement.
Figure 1The distributions of corneal power in rural China. K1 (a), K2 (b), |K1 − K2| (c), and average corneal power (K) (d).
Figure 2The distributions of axial length (AL), axial length/corneal curvature (AL/CR), and corneal endothelial counting (CEC) in rural China. Axial length (AL) (a), axial length/corneal curvature (AL/CR) (b), and corneal endothelial counting (CEC) (c).