| Literature DB >> 26508976 |
Wen-Rong Shi1, Yan Liu1, Xiao-Ting Wang1, Qiong-Ying Huang1, Xue-Rong Cai1, Shao-Rong Wu1.
Abstract
Brucea javanica is a traditional herbal medicine in China, and its antitumor activities are of research interest. Brucea javanica oil, extracted with ether and refined with 10% ethyl alcohol from Brucea javanica seed, was used to treat hepatoma H22-bearing mice in this study. The antitumor effect and probable mechanisms of the extracted Brucea javanica oil were studied in H22-bearing mice by WBC count, GOT, GPT levels, and western blotting. The H22 tumor inhibition ratio of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/kg bw Brucea javanica oil were 15.64%, 23.87%, and 38.27%. Brucea javanica oil could inhibit the involution of thymus induced by H22 tumor-bearing, but it could not inhibit the augmentation of spleen and liver. Brucea javanica oil could decrease the levels of WBC count and GOT and GPT in H22-bearing mice. The protein levels of GAPDH, Akt, TGF-β1, and α-SMA in tumor tissues decreased after being treated with Brucea javanica oil. Disturbing energy metabolism and neoplastic hyperplasia controlled by Akt and immunoregulation activity were its probable antitumor mechanisms in hepatoma H22-bearing mice.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26508976 PMCID: PMC4609869 DOI: 10.1155/2015/217494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of Brucea Javanica oil on body weight of H22-bearing mice before and after experiment (, n = 10).
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | Average body weight of mice before the experiment (g) | Average body weight of mice after the experiment (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 10 | 19.32 ± 1.86 | 23.67 ± 2.08 | |
| Negative control | 10 | 19.31 ± 1.63 | 22.35 ± 2.29 | |
| 5-Fu | 0.25 | 10 | 19.15 ± 1.49 | 21.14 ± 1.92 |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 19.30 ± 1.73 | 23.49 ± 1.94 |
| B | 1 | 10 | 19.06 ± 1.67 | 22.35 ± 2.34 |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 19.34 ± 1.79 | 22.39 ± 1.68 |
The average body weight of mice after the experiment excluding the tumor weight.
Figure 1The tumors excised from the mice in the different groups. ① Negative group, ② 0.5 g/kg bw Brucea javanica oil, ③ 1 g/kg bw Brucea javanica oil, ④ 1.5 g/kg bw Brucea javanica oil, and ⑤ positive group (25 mg/kg bw 5-Fu).
Effect of Brucea Javanica oil on tumor weight and tumor inhibition ratio (, n = 10).
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | Average tumor weight (g) | Inhibition ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 10 | 2.43 ± 1.08 | — | |
| 5-Fu | 0.025 | 10 | 1.40 ± 0.62 | 42.39 |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 2.05 ± 0.78 | 15.64 |
| B | 1 | 10 | 1.85 ± 0.73 | 23.87 |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 1.50 ± 0.39 | 38.27 |
Comparison with the negative control group, P < 0.01.
Changes in thymus index, spleen index, and liver index of mice ().
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | Thymus index (mg/g) | Spleen index (mg/g) | Liver index (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 10 | 5.01 ± 0.79 | 5.11 ± 1.35 | 46.79 ± 5.27 | |
| Negative control | 9 | 2.72 ± 1.06 | 8.76 ± 2.11 | 66.01 ± 6.29 | |
| 5-Fu | 0.025 | 10 | 1.22 ± 0.32 | 7.64 ± 1.77 | 62.33 ± 6.89 |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 3.72 ± 1.28 | 10.83 ± 1.09 | 68.56 ± 6.76 |
| B | 1 | 10 | 3.17 ± 0.95 | 11.80 ± 3.09 | 64.80 ± 6.72 |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 2.00 ± 0.75 | 10.37 ± 3.08 | 64.28 ± 8.36 |
Comparison with the normal control group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01. Comparison with the negative control group, △ P < 0.05, △△ P < 0.01.
Changes in kidney index, heart index, and lung index of mice ().
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | Kidney index (mg/g) | Heart index (mg/g) | Lung index (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 10 | 12.17 ± 0.84 | 5.29 ± 0.82 | 7.74 ± 2.46 | |
| Negative control | 9 | 12.07 ± 0.49 | 5.26 ± 0.47 | 6.01 ± 0.48 | |
| 5-Fu | 0.025 | 10 | 12.88 ± 1.57 | 5.48 ± 0.69 | 6.41 ± 0.69 |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 13.49 ± 2.52 | 5.87 ± 0.87 | 7.16 ± 1.26 |
| B | 1 | 10 | 13.08 ± 1.58 | 5.44 ± 0.87 | 7.20 ± 1.47 |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 12.21 ± 1.99 | 4.83 ± 0.70 | 7.25 ± 2.34 |
Changes of WBC count of mice ().
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | WBC count (109 cells/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 10 | 4.79 ± 1.36 | |
| Negative control | 9 | 13.88 ± 7.43 | |
| 5-Fu | 0.025 | 10 | 3.97 ± 1.22△△ |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 5.25 ± 1.53△△ |
| B | 1 | 10 | 5.98 ± 2.36△△ |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 5.58 ± 2.33△△ |
Comparison with the normal control group, P < 0.01; comparison with the negative control group, △△ P < 0.01.
Changes in the levels of GOT and GPT in serum of mice ().
| Group | Dose (g/kg bw) | Number of animals | GOT (U/L) | GPT (U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 10 | 146.00 ± 33.93 | 70.04 ± 14.47 | |
| Negative control | 9 | 780.16 ± 225.02 | 384.16 ± 70.41 | |
| 5-Fu | 0.025 | 10 | 395.00 ± 116.43 | 172.67 ± 41.59 |
| A | 0.5 | 10 | 589.60 ± 147.56 | 286.17 ± 71.84 |
| B | 1 | 10 | 568.40 ± 248.91 | 276.60 ± 90.91 |
| C | 1.5 | 10 | 665.66 ± 183.02 | 331.67 ± 91.01 |
Comparison with the normal control group, P < 0.01; comparison with the negative control group, △ P < 0.05, △△ P < 0.01.
Figure 2The protein levels of β-catenin, PI3K, Akt, GAPDH, α-SMA, and TGF-β1 in negative control group and 1.5 g/kg bw Brucea javanica oil group. The β-actin was as internal control. There were 8 samples detected randomly per group and the error bars correspond to mean ± standard deviations. Comparison with the negative control group, P < 0.05, P < 0.01.