Literature DB >> 26508753

Benefits of Stroke Treatment Using a Mobile Stroke Unit Compared With Standard Management: The BEST-MSU Study Run-In Phase.

Ritvij Bowry1, Stephanie Parker1, Suja S Rajan1, Jose-Miguel Yamal1, Tzu-Ching Wu1, Laura Richardson1, Elizabeth Noser1, David Persse1, Kamilah Jackson1, James C Grotta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Faster treatment with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) is likely to improve outcomes. Optimizing prehospital triage by mobile stroke units (MSUs) may speed treatment times. The Benefits of Stroke Treatment Delivered Using a Mobile Stroke Unit (BEST-MSU) study was launched in May 2014 using the first MSU in the United States to compare stroke management using an MSU versus standard management (SM). Herein, we describe the results of the prespecified, nonrandomized run-in phase designed to obtain preliminary data on study logistics.
METHODS: The run-in phase consisted of 8 MSU weeks when all-patient care occurred on the MSU and 2 SM weeks when the MSU nurse met personnel on scene or at the emergency department to ensure comparability with MSU patients. Telemedicine was independently performed in 9 MSU cases.
RESULTS: Of 130 alerts, 24 MSU and 2 SM patients were enrolled. Twelve of 24 MSU patients received tPA on board; 4 were treated within 60 minutes of last seen normal, and 4 went on to endovascular treatment. There were no hemorrhagic complications. Four had primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Agreement on tPA eligibility between the onsite and telemedicine physician was 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: The run-in phase provided a tPA treatment rate of 1.5 patients per week, assured us that treatment within 60 minutes of onset is possible, and enabled enrollment of patients on SM weeks. We also recognized the opportunity to assess the effect of the MSU on endovascular treatment and intracerebral hemorrhage. Challenges include the need to control biased patient selection on MSU versus SM weeks and establish inter-rater agreement for tPA treatment using telemedicine.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulances; emergency medical services; stroke; telemedicine; tissue-type plasminogen activator

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26508753     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  31 in total

Review 1.  Teleneurology and mobile technologies: the future of neurological care.

Authors:  E Ray Dorsey; Alistair M Glidden; Melissa R Holloway; Gretchen L Birbeck; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Role of Telemedicine in Prehospital Stroke Care.

Authors:  Jithendhar Kandimalla; Anantha R Vellipuram; Gustavo Rodriguez; Alberto Maud; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Rakesh Khatri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Identifying Key Words in 9-1-1 Calls for Stroke: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Baiyang Wang; Eddie Markul; Frank Albarran; Doreen Rottman; Neelum T Aggarwal; Patricia Lindeman; Leslee Stein-Spencer; Joseph M Weber; Kenneth S Pearlman; Katie L Tataris; Jane L Holl; Diego Klabjan; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Mobile stroke unit use for prehospital stroke treatment-an update.

Authors:  S Walter; A Ragoschke-Schumm; M Lesmeister; S A Helwig; M Kettner; I Q Grunwald; K Fassbender
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Mobile Stroke Units: Bringing Treatment to the Patient.

Authors:  Mikel S Ehntholt; Melvin Parasram; Saad A Mir; Mackenzie P Lerario
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable: The Next Generation of Endovascular Trials.

Authors:  Tudor G Jovin; Gregory W Albers; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Emergency Department Door-to-Puncture Time Since 2014.

Authors:  Alexandra L Czap; James C Grotta; Stephanie A Parker; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Ritvij Bowry; Sunil A Sheth; Suja S Rajan; Hyunsoo Hwang; Noopur Singh; Patti Bratina; Tomas Bryndziar; Andrei V Alexandrov; Anne W Alexandrov; Wendy Dusenbury; Victoria Swatzell; William Jones; Kimberly Ackerson; Brandi Schimpf; Patrick Wright; Amanda L Jagolino-Cole
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Mobile Stroke Units - Cost-Effective or Just an Expensive Hype?

Authors:  Silke Walter; Iris Q Grunwald; Stefan A Helwig; Andreas Ragoschke-Schumm; Michael Kettner; Mathias Fousse; Martin Lesmeister; Klaus Fassbender
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Mobile Stroke Unit Computed Tomography Angiography Substantially Shortens Door-to-Puncture Time.

Authors:  Alexandra L Czap; Noopur Singh; Ritvij Bowry; Amanda Jagolino-Cole; Stephanie A Parker; Kenny Phan; Mengxi Wang; Sunil A Sheth; Suja S Rajan; Jose-Miguel Yamal; James C Grotta
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  The Evolution of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Feras Akbik; Joshua A Hirsch; Pedro Telles Cougo-Pinto; Ronil V Chandra; Claus Z Simonsen; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.