Katrina Harborne1, Jonathan M Hazlehurst2, Hari Shanmugaratnam3, Samuel Pearson3, Alison Doyle4, Neil J Gittoes3, Surabhi Choudhary1, Rachel K Crowley5. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 2. 2 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. 3 Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 4. 4 Falls and Fracture Prevention Service, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 5. 5 Department of Endocrinology, St Vincent's Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin & University College, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are important to diagnose early to avoid progression to complete fracture. We set out to determine the reporting accuracy of AFFs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of imaging performed between November 2010 and June 2013 to analyse the X-ray reporting of AFFs and to describe the key clinical considerations. Radiological reports were reviewed from the 3805 separate femoral images for search terms thought likely to identify AFFs. This identified 1558 patients. The identified radiographs were reviewed by radiologists with reference to the 2010 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria. RESULTS: Within these 1558 patients, 16 patients met the radiological criteria for AFF according to the 2010 ASBMR task force statement of which, although all were identified as fractures, 15 were not reported as "atypical" by the original reporting author and none was formally classified as AFF by the original reporting author. Within the 1558 patients, there were an additional 17 patients labelled as having "atypical" fracture features originally, although only 1 patient met the 2010 ASBMR task force criteria for AFF. Only 13 of 16 patients had imaging of the contralateral femur, and there was a significant delay for those who were imaged (111 ± 44 days). Furthermore, two of the patients with an AFF had previous radiographs demonstrating cortical changes indicative of AFFs prior to formal diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Whilst AFFs are rare diagnoses, the compliance with published guidelines for their radiological classification is low. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We have raised awareness of the importance of recognizing AFFs to guide management.
OBJECTIVE: Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are important to diagnose early to avoid progression to complete fracture. We set out to determine the reporting accuracy of AFFs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of imaging performed between November 2010 and June 2013 to analyse the X-ray reporting of AFFs and to describe the key clinical considerations. Radiological reports were reviewed from the 3805 separate femoral images for search terms thought likely to identify AFFs. This identified 1558 patients. The identified radiographs were reviewed by radiologists with reference to the 2010 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria. RESULTS: Within these 1558 patients, 16 patients met the radiological criteria for AFF according to the 2010 ASBMR task force statement of which, although all were identified as fractures, 15 were not reported as "atypical" by the original reporting author and none was formally classified as AFF by the original reporting author. Within the 1558 patients, there were an additional 17 patients labelled as having "atypical" fracture features originally, although only 1 patient met the 2010 ASBMR task force criteria for AFF. Only 13 of 16 patients had imaging of the contralateral femur, and there was a significant delay for those who were imaged (111 ± 44 days). Furthermore, two of the patients with an AFF had previous radiographs demonstrating cortical changes indicative of AFFs prior to formal diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Whilst AFFs are rare diagnoses, the compliance with published guidelines for their radiological classification is low. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We have raised awareness of the importance of recognizing AFFs to guide management.
Authors: Laura M Fayad; Ihab R Kamel; Satomi Kawamoto; David A Bluemke; Frank J Frassica; Elliot K Fishman Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Elizabeth Shane; David Burr; Bo Abrahamsen; Robert A Adler; Thomas D Brown; Angela M Cheung; Felicia Cosman; Jeffrey R Curtis; Richard Dell; David W Dempster; Peter R Ebeling; Thomas A Einhorn; Harry K Genant; Piet Geusens; Klaus Klaushofer; Joseph M Lane; Fergus McKiernan; Ross McKinney; Alvin Ng; Jeri Nieves; Regis O'Keefe; Socrates Papapoulos; Tet Sen Howe; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Robert S Weinstein; Michael P Whyte Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Mario Pedrazzoni; Andrea Giusti; Giuseppe Girasole; Barbara Abbate; Ignazio Verzicco; Gianfranco Cervellin Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Malachi J McKenna; Fergus E McKiernan; Bernie McGowan; Carmel Silke; Kathleen Bennett; Susan van der Kamp; Paul Ward; Conor Hurson; Eric Heffernan Journal: J Endocr Soc Date: 2017-02-13