Literature DB >> 21350886

Nonoperative versus prophylactic treatment of bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures.

Michael B Banffy1, Mark S Vrahas, John E Ready, John A Abraham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified a specific fracture in the proximal diaphysis of the femur in patients treated with bisphosphonates. The fractures typically are sustained after a low-energy mechanism with the presence of an existing characteristic stress fracture. However, it is unclear whether these patients are best treated nonoperatively or operatively. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: What is the likelihood of nonoperatively treated bisphosphonate-associated femoral stress fractures progressing to completion and during what time period? If prophylactic fixation is performed, do patients have a shorter hospital length-of-stay compared with patients having surgical fixation after fracture completion? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively searched for patients older than 50 years receiving bisphosphonate therapy, with either incomplete, nondisplaced stress fractures or completed, displaced fractures in the proximal diaphysis of the femur between July 2002 and April 2009. After applying exclusion criteria, we identified 34 patients with a total of 40 bisphosphonate-associated fractures. The average duration of bisphosphonate use was 77 months. Twenty-eight of 40 (70%) fractures were completed, displaced fractures. Six of the 12 nondisplaced stress fractures initially were treated nonoperatively. The remaining six stress fractures were treated with prophylactic cephalomedullary nail fixation. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 36.5 months; range, 12-72 months).
RESULTS: Five of the six stress fractures treated nonoperatively progressed to fracture completion and displacement at an average of 10 months (range, 3-18 months). The average hospital stay was 3.7 days for patients treated prophylactically and 6.0 days for patients treated after fracture completion.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest nonoperative treatment of bisphosphonate-related femoral stress fractures is not a reliable way to treat these fractures as the majority progress to fracture completion. Prophylactic fixation of femoral stress fractures also reduces total hospital admission time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350886      PMCID: PMC3111775          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1828-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons position paper on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates inhibit the mevalonate pathway and prevent post-translational prenylation of GTP-binding proteins, including Ras.

Authors:  S P Luckman; D E Hughes; F P Coxon; R Graham; G Russell; M J Rogers
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy.

Authors:  Clarita V Odvina; Joseph E Zerwekh; D Sudhaker Rao; Naim Maalouf; Frank A Gottschalk; Charles Y C Pak
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Stress fractures of the femoral neck.

Authors:  M B Devas
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1965-11

6.  Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Ann V Schwartz; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Silvina Levis; Sara A Quandt; Suzanne Satterfield; Robert B Wallace; Douglas C Bauer; Lisa Palermo; Lois E Wehren; Antonio Lombardi; Arthur C Santora; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Is surgery necessary for femoral insufficiency fractures after long-term bisphosphonate therapy?

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Myung-Rae Cho; Ki Hong Park; Shin-Yoon Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates increases microdamage accumulation and reduces some biomechanical properties in dog rib.

Authors:  T Mashiba; T Hirano; C H Turner; M R Forwood; C C Johnston; D B Burr
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; D E Thompson; W B Applegate; E Barrett-Connor; T A Musliner; L Palermo; R Prineas; S M Rubin; J C Scott; T Vogt; R Wallace; A J Yates; A Z LaCroix
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Systematic review of role of bisphosphonates on skeletal morbidity in metastatic cancer.

Authors:  J R Ross; Y Saunders; P M Edmonds; S Patel; K E Broadley; S R D Johnston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30
View more
  39 in total

1.  Atypical femur fractures: a survey of current practices in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  P S Schneider; M Wall; J P Brown; A M Cheung; E J Harvey; S N Morin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  What the emergency radiologist needs to know about treatment-related complications from conventional chemotherapy and newer molecular targeted agents.

Authors:  Sona A Chikarmane; Bharti Khurana; Katherine M Krajewski; Atul B Shinagare; Stephanie Howard; Aaron Sodickson; Jyothi Jagannathan; Nikhil Ramaiya
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-06-07

Review 3.  Atypical femoral fractures: epidemiology, etiology, and patient management.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly; Anas Saleh; Aasis Unnanuntana; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.302

4.  Prophylactic Fixation Can Be Cost-effective in Preventing a Contralateral Bisphosphonate-associated Femur Fracture.

Authors:  Sam Y Jiang; David J Kaufman; Bonnie Y Chien; Michael Longoria; Ross Shachter; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A review of atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures in Northern Ireland between 2010 and 2014.

Authors:  K J Donnelly; A Tucker; B Kerr; S McDonald; D S O'Longain; J D Acton
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  Progression of bisphosphonate-associated impending atypical femoral fracture despite prophylactic cephalomedullary nailing: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Samantha J Yarmis; Justin Tsai; Julio J Jauregui
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-29

7.  Femoral stress fractures associated with long-term bisphosphonate treatment.

Authors:  William G Ward; Christina J Carter; Scott C Wilson; Cynthia L Emory
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Atypical femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Eugenio Chiarello; Giuseppe Tedesco; Matteo Cadossi; Deianira Luciani; Antonio Mazzotti; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Atypical femoral fractures: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pingal A Desai; Parth A Vyas; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Management strategy for symptomatic bisphosphonate-associated incomplete atypical femoral fractures.

Authors:  Anas Saleh; Vishal V Hegde; Anish G Potty; Robert Schneider; Charles N Cornell; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-05-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.