Hélène Chapy1,2,3, Bruno Saubaméa1,2,3, Nicolas Tournier4, Fanchon Bourasset1,2,3, Francine Behar-Cohen5,6, Xavier Declèves1,2,3,7, Jean-Michel Scherrmann1,2,3,7, Salvatore Cisternino1,2,3,7. 1. Variabilité de Réponse aux Psychotropes, INSERM, U1144, Paris, France. 2. Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris Descartes, UMR-S 1144, Paris, France. 3. Université Paris Diderot, UMR-S 1144, Paris, France. 4. INSERM, CEA, Université Paris Sud, UMR 1023 - ERL 9218 CNRS, IMIV, Orsay, France. 5. Université Paris Descartes, UMR-S 1138, Paris, France. 6. Physiopathologies des Maladies Oculaires, INSERM U1138, Paris, France. 7. Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris - AP-HP, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The respective impact and interplay between ABC (P-glycoprotein/P-gp/Abcb1a, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP/ABCC) and SLC transporter functions at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-retinal barriers (BRB) are incompletely understood. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We measured the initial cerebral and retinal distribution of selected ABC substrates by in situ carotid perfusion using P-gp/Bcrp knockout mice and chemical ABC/SLC modulation strategies. P-gp, Bcrp, Mrp1 and Mrp4 were studied by confocal retina imaging. KEY RESULTS: Chemical or physical disruption of P-gp increased [(3) H]-verapamil transport by ~10-fold at the BBB and ~1.5-fold at the BRB. [(3) H]-Verapamil transport involved influx-mediated by an organic cation clonidine-sensitive/diphenhydramine-sensitive proton antiporter at both barriers; this effect was unmasked when P-gp was partially or fully inhibited/disrupted at the BBB. Studies of [(3) H]-mitoxantrone and [(3) H]-zidovudine transport suggested, respectively, that Bcrp efflux was less involved at the BRB than BBB, whereas Mrps were significantly and similarly involved at both barriers. Confocal imaging showed that P-gp and Bcrp were expressed in intra-retinal vessels (inner BRB/iBRB) but absent from the blood/basal membrane of cells of the retinal pigment epithelium (outer BRB/oBRB/RPE) where, in contrast, Mrp1 and Mrp4 were localized. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: P-gp, Bcrp, Mrp1 and Mrp4 are differentially expressed at the outer and inner BRB, resulting in an altered ability to limit substrate distribution at the retina as compared with the BBB. [(3) H]-Verapamil distribution is not P-gp-specific and involves a proton antiporter at both the BBB and BRB. However, this transport is concealed by P-gp at the BBB, but not at the BRB, where P-gp activity is reduced.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The respective impact and interplay between ABC (P-glycoprotein/P-gp/Abcb1a, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP/ABCC) and SLC transporter functions at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-retinal barriers (BRB) are incompletely understood. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We measured the initial cerebral and retinal distribution of selected ABC substrates by in situ carotid perfusion using P-gp/Bcrp knockout mice and chemical ABC/SLC modulation strategies. P-gp, Bcrp, Mrp1 and Mrp4 were studied by confocal retina imaging. KEY RESULTS: Chemical or physical disruption of P-gp increased [(3) H]-verapamil transport by ~10-fold at the BBB and ~1.5-fold at the BRB. [(3) H]-Verapamil transport involved influx-mediated by an organic cation clonidine-sensitive/diphenhydramine-sensitive proton antiporter at both barriers; this effect was unmasked when P-gp was partially or fully inhibited/disrupted at the BBB. Studies of [(3) H]-mitoxantrone and [(3) H]-zidovudine transport suggested, respectively, that Bcrp efflux was less involved at the BRB than BBB, whereas Mrps were significantly and similarly involved at both barriers. Confocal imaging showed that P-gp and Bcrp were expressed in intra-retinal vessels (inner BRB/iBRB) but absent from the blood/basal membrane of cells of the retinal pigment epithelium (outer BRB/oBRB/RPE) where, in contrast, Mrp1 and Mrp4 were localized. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: P-gp, Bcrp, Mrp1 and Mrp4 are differentially expressed at the outer and inner BRB, resulting in an altered ability to limit substrate distribution at the retina as compared with the BBB. [(3) H]-Verapamil distribution is not P-gp-specific and involves a proton antiporter at both the BBB and BRB. However, this transport is concealed by P-gp at the BBB, but not at the BRB, where P-gp activity is reduced.
Authors: Tao Zhang; Cathie D Xiang; David Gale; Samantha Carreiro; Ellen Y Wu; Eric Y Zhang Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2008-04-14 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Amber Dahlin; Ethan Geier; Sophie L Stocker; Cheryl D Cropp; Elena Grigorenko; Michele Bloomer; Julie Siegenthaler; Lu Xu; Anthony S Basile; Diane D-S Tang-Liu; Kathleen M Giacomini Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael Z Liao; Chunying Gao; Laura M Shireman; Brian Phillips; Linda J Risler; Naveen K Neradugomma; Prachi Choudhari; Bhagwat Prasad; Danny D Shen; Qingcheng Mao Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Andrea Luaces-Rodríguez; Miguel González-Barcia; María José Blanco-Teijeiro; María Gil-Martínez; Francisco Gonzalez; Francisco Gómez-Ulla; María-Jesús Lamas; Francisco-Javier Otero-Espinar; Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: T Abruzzo; K Abraham; K B Karani; J I Geller; S Vadivelu; J M Racadio; B Zhang; Z M Correa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.825