M Schneck1, K Holder2, S Gielen2, S Nuding2, J Schröder2, A R Tamm2, K Werdan2, H Ebelt2. 1. Department of Medicine III, University Hospital of Halle, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06097, Halle, Germany. Michael.Schneck@uk-halle.de. 2. Department of Medicine III, University Hospital of Halle, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06097, Halle, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To detect connections between parameters of ventilation and outcomes of cardiac intensive care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Noninterventional study. Between 05/11 and 05/12 all patients with acute heart failure and post cardiopulmonary resuscitation were registered. Lung protective ventilation was defined as peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) < 30 mmHg and tidal volume (Vt) < = 6 ml/kg. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients were included in the study, 68.2 % male, age 67.9 ± 13.4 years, weight 71.4 ± 37.2 kg, predictive body weight 66.9 ± 8.8 kg, mortality 47.3 %. Lung protective ventilated patients at day 1: 17.3 % with a significant difference between surviving and nonsurviving patients (24.1 % vs. 9.6 %; p < 0.05). Logistic regression models showed a strong connection between PIP and survival (odds ratio 1.13; p < 0.05). Vt showed no significant influence on survival. CONCLUSION: Our data recommends a strict observance of a low PIP for cardiac intensive care patients, whereas Vt seems to be of secondary importance.
OBJECTIVE: To detect connections between parameters of ventilation and outcomes of cardiac intensive care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Noninterventional study. Between 05/11 and 05/12 all patients with acute heart failure and post cardiopulmonary resuscitation were registered. Lung protective ventilation was defined as peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) < 30 mmHg and tidal volume (Vt) < = 6 ml/kg. RESULTS: In total, 129 patients were included in the study, 68.2 % male, age 67.9 ± 13.4 years, weight 71.4 ± 37.2 kg, predictive body weight 66.9 ± 8.8 kg, mortality 47.3 %. Lung protective ventilated patients at day 1: 17.3 % with a significant difference between surviving and nonsurviving patients (24.1 % vs. 9.6 %; p < 0.05). Logistic regression models showed a strong connection between PIP and survival (odds ratio 1.13; p < 0.05). Vt showed no significant influence on survival. CONCLUSION: Our data recommends a strict observance of a low PIP for cardiac intensive care patients, whereas Vt seems to be of secondary importance.
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Roy G Brower; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Arthur Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Karl Werdan; Martin Ruß; Michael Buerke; Georg Delle-Karth; Alexander Geppert; Friedrich A Schöndube Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Todd W Rice; Arthur P Wheeler; Gordon R Bernard; Douglas L Hayden; David A Schoenfeld; Lorraine B Ware Journal: Chest Date: 2007-06-15 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-06-28
Authors: Ognjen Gajic; Saqib I Dara; Jose L Mendez; Adebola O Adesanya; Emir Festic; Sean M Caples; Rimki Rana; Jennifer L St Sauver; James F Lymp; Bekele Afessa; Rolf D Hubmayr Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke; Alexander Geppert; Holger Thiele; Bernd Zwissler; Martin Ruß Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 5.594