Literature DB >> 26507492

Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds.

Nicole Wetzel1, David Buttelmann2, Andy Schieler2, Andreas Widmann3.   

Abstract

Surprisingly occurring sounds outside the focus of attention can involuntarily capture attention. This study focuses on the impact of deviant sounds on the pupil size as a marker of auditory involuntary attention in infants. We presented an oddball paradigm including four types of deviant sounds within a sequence of repeated standard sounds to 14-month-old infants and to adults. Environmental and noise deviant sounds elicited a strong pupil dilation response (PDR) in both age groups. In contrast, moderate frequency deviants elicited a significant PDR in adults only. Moreover, a principal component analysis revealed two components underlying the PDR. Component scores differ, depending on deviant types, between age groups. Results indicate age effects of parasympathetic inhibition and sympathetic activation of the pupil size caused by deviant sounds with a high arousing potential. Results demonstrate that the PDR is a sensitive tool for the investigation of involuntary attention to sounds in preverbal children.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PDR; attention; children; development; distraction; infants; novel; pupil dilation; pupillometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26507492     DOI: 10.1002/dev.21377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  25 in total

1.  Prediction in infants and adults: A pupillometry study.

Authors:  Felicia Zhang; Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Robert C Wilson; Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2018-12-27

2.  How the inference of hierarchical rules unfolds over time.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Ariel Starr; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Comparing methods of analysis in pupillometry: application to the assessment of listening effort in hearing-impaired patients.

Authors:  Lou Seropian; Mathieu Ferschneider; Fanny Cholvy; Christophe Micheyl; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Annie Moulin
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies.

Authors:  Stuart R Steinhauer; Margaret M Bradley; Greg J Siegle; Kathryn A Roecklein; Annika Dix
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.

Authors:  Jan Willem de Gee; Camile M C Correa; Matthew Weaver; Tobias H Donner; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Effect of Speech-to-Noise Ratio and Luminance on a Range of Current and Potential Pupil Response Measures to Assess Listening Effort.

Authors:  Patrycja Książek; Adriana A Zekveld; Dorothea Wendt; Lorenz Fiedler; Thomas Lunner; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  The moment-to-moment pitch dynamics of child-directed speech shape toddlers' attention and learning.

Authors:  Mira L Nencheva; Elise A Piazza; Casey Lew-Williams
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-06-16

8.  Inter- and intra-individual coupling between pupillary, electrophysiological, and behavioral responses in a visual oddball task.

Authors:  Sara LoTemplio; Jack Silcox; Kara D Federmeier; Brennan R Payne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.348

9.  Distraction by Novel and Pitch-Deviant Sounds in Children.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Erich Schröger; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 10.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.