Literature DB >> 26507286

Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

J P van der List1, L S McDonald2, A D Pearle3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained popularity in patients with isolated unicompartmental osteoarthritis. To our knowledge no systematic review has assessed and compared survivorship of medial and lateral UKA. We performed a systematic review assessing medial and lateral UKA survivorship and comparing survivorship in cohort studies and registry-based studies.
METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane systems. Ninety-six eligible studies reported survivorship, of which fifty-eight reported medial and sixteen reported lateral UKA survivorship. Nineteen cohort studies and seven registry-based studies reported combined medial and lateral survivorship.
RESULTS: The five-year, ten-year and fifteen-year medial UKA survivorship was 93.9%, 91.7% and 88.9%, respectively. Lateral UKA survivorship was 93.2%, 91.4% and 89.4% at five-year, ten-year and fifteen-year, respectively. No statistical difference between both compartments was found. At twenty years and twenty-five years survivorship of medial UKA was 84.7% and 80%, respectively, but no studies reported lateral UKA survivorship at these follow-up intervals. Survivorship of cohort studies was not significantly higher compared to registry-based studies at five years (94.3 vs. 91.7, respectively, p=0.133) but was significantly higher at ten years (90.5 vs. 84.1, p=0.015).
CONCLUSION: This is the first systematic review that shows no difference in the five-, ten- and fifteen-year survivorship of medial and lateral UKA. We found a lower survivorship in the registry-based studies compared to cohort studies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failure rate; Knee arthroplasty; Revision; Survivorship; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26507286     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  14 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The pertinent question in treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy or unicondylar knee arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Michael Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review of reasons for failure.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Mohamed A Imam; Octavian Andronic; Tabea Perz; Karl Wieser; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients under the age of 60 years provides excellent clinical outcomes and 10-year implant survival: a systematic review : A study performed by the Early Osteoarthritis group of ESSKA-European Knee Associates section.

Authors:  Theofylaktos Kyriakidis; Vipin Asopa; Mike Baums; René Verdonk; Trifon Totlis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.

Authors:  Andrew J Porteous; James R A Smith; Rachel Bray; James R Robinson; Paul White; James R D Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg Hauer; Gerwin A Bernhardt; Gloria Hohenberger; Lukas Leitner; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Andreas Leithner; Gerald Gruber; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Arthroscopy combined with unicondylar knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated unicompartmental knee arthritis: A long-term comparison.

Authors:  Hao-Ran Wang; Zhong-Li Li; Ji Li; Yu-Xing Wang; Zhi-Dong Zhao; Wei Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Mid-Term Outcomes of Metal-Backed Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Show Superiority to All-Polyethylene Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Laura J Kleeblad; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.