| Literature DB >> 26505627 |
Richard R Rodrigues1, Rosana P Pineda2, Jacob N Barney3, Erik T Nilsen4, John E Barrett4, Mark A Williams5.
Abstract
The importance of plant-microbe associations for the invasion of plant species have not been often tested under field conditions. The research sought to determine patterns of change in microbial communities associated with the establishment of invasive plants with different taxonomic and phenetic traits. Three independent locations in Virginia, USA were selected. One site was invaded by a grass (Microstegium vimineum), another by a shrub (Rhamnus davurica), and the third by a tree (Ailanthus altissima). The native vegetation from these sites was used as reference. 16S rRNA and ITS regions were sequenced to study root-zone bacterial and fungal communities, respectively, in invaded and non-invaded samples and analyzed using Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME). Though root-zone microbial community structure initially differed across locations, plant invasion shifted communities in similar ways. Indicator species analysis revealed that Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) closely related to Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Ascomycota increased in abundance due to plant invasions. The Hyphomonadaceae family in the Rhodobacterales order and ammonia-oxidizing Nitrospirae phylum showed greater relative abundance in the invaded root-zone soils. Hyphomicrobiaceae, another bacterial family within the phyla Proteobacteria increased as a result of plant invasion, but the effect associated most strongly with root-zones of M. vimineum and R. davurica. Functional analysis using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) showed bacteria responsible for nitrogen cycling in soil increased in relative abundance in association with plant invasion. In agreement with phylogenetic and functional analyses, greater turnover of ammonium and nitrate was associated with plant invasion. Overall, bacterial and fungal communities changed congruently across plant invaders, and support the hypothesis that nitrogen cycling bacteria and functions are important factors in plant invasions. Whether the changes in microbial communities are driven by direct plant microbial interactions or a result of plant-driven changes in soil properties remains to be determined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26505627 PMCID: PMC4624766 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Details of Sampling Locations.
| Location | Invasive Species | Soil Type | Native Species |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Montalto loam. Taxonomic class: Fine, mixed, semiactive, mesic Ultic Hapludalfs. |
|
|
|
| Berks-Weikert composition on slopes from 15 to 25 percent [ |
|
|
|
| Timberville silt loam. Taxonomic class: Fine, mixed, active, mesic Typic Hapludults Poplimento-Rock outcrop complex. Taxonomic class: Fine, mixed, subactive, mesic Ultic Hapludalfs. |
|
The following experimental groups were studied: (i) location (A, M, and R); (ii) invasion status (Invasive plants (I) and Native plants (N)); and (iii) interaction of location and invasion status (Aa, AaR, Mv, MvR, Rd, and RdR).
Mean Values (St. Dev.) and Two-Way Analysis of Variance on Soil Nutrition Parameters from Three Sites in Central Appalachian Mountains with Invaded and Non-Invaded Locations.
| Location | M | R | A | Location | Invasion Status | Location x invasion status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invader |
|
|
| ||||||
| Invasion status | Invaded | Non-invaded | Invaded | Non-invaded | Invaded | Non-invaded | |||
| pH | 5.36 | 4.9 (0.15) | 6.69 | 6.66 (0.12) | 6.29 | 6.67 (0.31) |
| 0.608 |
|
| P | 2.4 (0.5) | 2.2 (0.5) | 11.8 (6.8) | 4.4 (1.1) | 2.6 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.00) |
|
|
|
| K | 106.8 | 52.4 (5.9) | 104.0 | 72.4 (18.5) | 150.4 (35.8) | 126.4 (37.6) |
|
| 0.442 |
| Ca | 553.2 | 156.2 (26.3) | 1151.6 (175.9) | 1123.6 (117.4) | 1174.0 | 1634.8 (265.6) |
| 0.872 |
|
| Mg | 65.0 (11.2) | 32.8 (2.6) | 97.0 (7.3) | 88.4 (9.2) | 164.0 (46.8) | 208.4 (25.7) |
| 0.887 |
|
| Zn | 2.18 (0.37) | 1.88 (0.29) | 1.36 (0.31) | 1.28 (0.25) | 4.72 (1.18) | 5.12 (1.11) |
| 0.980 | 0.538 |
| Mn | 12.62 | 15.4 (7.61) | 11.44 | 7.48 (0.64) | 14.96 | 32.3 (7.74) | 0.478 |
|
|
| Cu | 1.4 (0.22) | 1.48 (0.50) | 0.60 (0.23) | 0.82 (0.18) | 1.24 (0.55) | 0.78 (0.19) |
| 0.677 | 0.091 |
| Fe | 18.5 (4.93) | 22.4 (5.37) | 16.4 (18.1) | 18.5 (4.93) | 3.98 | 2.46 (0.67) |
| 0.118 | 0.185 |
| B | 0.3 | 0.2 (0.0) | 0.5 (0.1) | 0.5 (0.1) | 0.8 | 1.4 (0.3) |
|
|
|
| CEC | 6.4 (0.42) | 6.1 (1.16) | 6.9 (0.86) | 6.5 (0.62) | 8.14 (1.60) | 10.26 (1.50) | 0.052 | 0.222 |
|
Parameter = soil nutrition trait; Location = the three locations where each species was sampled; Invasion Status = invaded and non-invaded plots. Bolded values indicate significant (p ≤ 0.05) effects. All nutrient units are μg element g-1 soil. The statistical test (Tukey HSD means separation) is between invaded and non-invaded within site.
* = p ≤ 0.05
** = p ≤ 0.01
*** = p ≤ 0.001
Turnover (Percentage) of Inorganic Nitrogen (Mean, SE ) in Non-Invaded and Invaded Locations at Three Sites in Central Appalachian Mountains.
| Location | M | R | A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invader |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Invasion status | Invaded | Non-invaded | Invaded | Non-invaded | Invaded | Non-invaded | Invaded | Non-invaded |
| NO3 | 42 (8) | -20 (20) | 236 (106) | 196 (70) | 108 (24) | 33 (5) | 137 (45) | 61 (31) |
| NH4 | 247 (41) | 347 (45) | 6 (19) | -61 (20) | 209 (48) | 83 (17) | 154 (35) | 123 (48) |
a The standard error (SE) of the mean is in given in parenthesis.
Alpha Diversity Metrics for Invasion, Location, and Location x Invasion in Bacteria.
| Chao1 | Observed Species | Shannon | Simpson | PD Whole Tree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invasion status | |||||
| I (n = 11) | 24,563 | 15,024 | 10.83 | 0.998 | 604 |
| N (n = 15) | 20,566 | 12,328 | 10.54 | 0.997 | 512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Locations | |||||
| A | 25,687 | 15,326 | 10.82 | 0.997 | 616 |
| M | 17,512 | 11,000 | 10.43 | 0.998 | 448 |
| R | 23,460 | 13,987 | 10.75 | 0.997 | 591 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.817 |
|
| Location x Invasion status | |||||
| Aa | 27,684 | 16,806 | 10.98 | 0.998 | 666 |
| AaR | 23,691 | 13,845 | 10.65 | 0.997 | 566 |
| Mv | 19,507 | 12,108 | 10.61 | 0.998 | 494 |
| MvR | 15,915 | 10,114 | 10.28 | 0.997 | 410 |
| Rd | 26,875 | 16,398 | 10.87 | 0.998 | 668 |
| RdR | 22,093 | 13,023 | 10.70 | 0.997 | 559 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.103 |
|
Bolded values indicate significant (α<0.05) effects.
Alpha Diversity Metrics for Invasion, Location, and Location x Invasion in Fungi.
| Chao1 | Observed species | Shannon | Simpson | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invasion status | ||||
| I (n = 15) | 814 | 537 | 6.30 | 0.947 |
| N (n = 15) | 728 | 483 | 5.87 | 0.935 |
|
|
|
| 0.076 | 0.221 |
| Locations | ||||
| A | 863 | 600 | 6.60 | 0.962 |
| M | 800 | 512 | 6.29 | 0.959 |
| R | 650 | 420 | 5.36 | 0.902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Location x invasion status | ||||
| Aa | 844 | 570 | 6.65 | 0.965 |
| AaR | 883 | 629 | 6.55 | 0.959 |
| Mv | 935 | 604 | 6.56 | 0.961 |
| MvR | 666 | 421 | 6.02 | 0.958 |
| Rd | 664 | 438 | 5.68 | 0.916 |
| RdR | 636 | 401 | 5.03 | 0.889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bolded values indicate significant (α<0.05) effects.
Fig 1PCoA plot describing (a) un-weighted and (b) weighted Unifrac for bacteria and (c) Bray-Curtis distances for fungi in the invaded and non-invaded sites.
Each circle indicates a sample. Multivariate data analysis methods of adonis and ANOSIM were used to identify whether groups were significantly different.
Fig 2Taxonomic summary of the relative abundance of (a) bacterial and (b) fungal phyla in the invaded and non-invaded sites.
The taxa are arranged as per total relative abundance across all samples, with the most abundant phyla at the bottom and the least abundant phyla at the top of the y-axis. Similarly, the phylum names in the legend are arranged from the least abundant at the top to the most abundant at the bottom.
Genera with a Greater Relative Abundance Associated with Invasion and Determined to have a Significant Effect Based on Indicator Species Analysis (IV > 70 and p-value < 0.01).
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acidobacteria | - | - | - | - | 0.30 | 0.17 |
| Acidobacteria | Holophagae | Holophagales | Holophagaceae | Geothrix | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Acidobacteria | iii1-8 | SJA-36 | - | - | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Acidobacteria | RB25 | - | - | - | 0.25 | 0.12 |
| Acidobacteria | S035 | - | - | - | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Micrococcaceae | Arthrobacter | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Williamsiaceae | Williamsia | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Chloroflexi | TK10 | - | - | - | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Gemmatimonadetes | Gemmatimonadetes | - | - | - | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Nitrospirae | Nitrospira | Nitrospirales | - | - | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| Nitrospirae | Nitrospira | Nitrospirales | Nitrospiraceae | Nitrospira | 0.52 | 0.10 |
| OD1 | SM2F11 | - | - | - | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| OP3 | koll11 | - | - | - | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| OP3 | PBS-25 | - | - | - | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhodobacterales | Hyphomonadaceae | - | 0.21 | 0.07 |
| Proteobacteria | Alphaproteobacteria | Rhizobiales | Hyphomicrobiaceae | Hyphomicrobium | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Methylophilales | Methylophilaceae | - | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Proteobacteria | Betaproteobacteria | Rhodocyclales | Rhodocyclaceae | Dechloromonas | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | NB1-j | MND4 | - | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Proteobacteria | Deltaproteobacteria | Desulfuromonadales | Geobacteraceae | Geobacter | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| WS2 | SHA-109 | - | - | - | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| *Actinobacteria | Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | Thermomonosporaceae | Actinomadura | 0.00 | 0.01 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ascomycota | - | - | - | - | 1.34 | 0.34 |
| Ascomycota | Dothideomycetes | Capnodiales | Mycosphaerellaceae | Cladosporium | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Ascomycota | Leotiomycetes | - | - | - | 0.37 | 0.11 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | - | 6.52 | 2.10 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Cylindrocarpon | 0.95 | 0.45 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Fusarium | 0.83 | 0.14 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Hypocreales | Nectriaceae | Neonectria | 0.15 | 0.02 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Incertae sedis | Plectosphaerellaceae | Plectosphaerella | 0.24 | 0.03 |
| Ascomycota | Sordariomycetes | Sordariales | - | - | 1.07 | 0.53 |
The hyphen (-) indicates that no taxonomic information was available for that OTU at that level. The bacterial OTU indicated with asterisk (*) was the only OTU associated with non-invaded samples in the ISA. The last two columns indicate the percentage of relative abundance of taxa in the invaded and non-invaded samples, respectively.