Literature DB >> 26505531

A global initiative to refine acute inhalation studies through the use of 'evident toxicity' as an endpoint: Towards adoption of the fixed concentration procedure.

Fiona Sewell1, Ian Ragan2, Tim Marczylo3, Brian Anderson4, Anne Braun5, Warren Casey6, Ngaire Dennison7, David Griffiths8, Robert Guest8, Tom Holmes9, Ton van Huygevoort10, Ian Indans11, Terry Kenny12, Hajime Kojima13, Kyuhong Lee14, Pilar Prieto15, Paul Smith16, Jason Smedley17, William S Stokes18, Gary Wnorowski19, Graham Horgan20.   

Abstract

Acute inhalation studies are conducted in animals as part of chemical hazard identification and characterisation, including for classification and labelling purposes. Current accepted methods use death as an endpoint (OECD TG403 and TG436), whereas the fixed concentration procedure (FCP) (draft OECD TG433) uses fewer animals and replaces lethality as an endpoint with 'evident toxicity.' Evident toxicity is defined as clear signs of toxicity that predict exposure to the next highest concentration will cause severe toxicity or death in most animals. A global initiative including 20 organisations, led by the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has shared data on the clinical signs recorded during acute inhalation studies for 172 substances (primarily dusts or mists) with the aim of making evident toxicity more objective and transferable between laboratories. Pairs of studies (5 male or 5 female rats) with at least a two-fold change in concentration were analysed to determine if there are any signs at the lower dose that could have predicted severe toxicity or death at the higher concentration. The results show that signs such as body weight loss (>10% pre-dosing weight), irregular respiration, tremors and hypoactivity, seen at least once in at least one animal after the day of dosing are highly predictive (positive predictive value > 90%) of severe toxicity or death at the next highest concentration. The working group has used these data to propose changes to TG433 that incorporate a clear indication of the clinical signs that define evident toxicity.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3Rs; Acute inhalation studies; Evident toxicity; Fixed concentration procedure (FCP); Refinement; Regulatory toxicology; TG4303; TG433; TG436

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26505531     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  8 in total

1.  Alternative approaches for acute inhalation toxicity testing to address global regulatory and non-regulatory data requirements: An international workshop report.

Authors:  Amy J Clippinger; David Allen; Annie M Jarabek; Marco Corvaro; Marianna Gaça; Sean Gehen; Jon A Hotchkiss; Grace Patlewicz; Jodie Melbourne; Paul Hinderliter; Miyoung Yoon; Dongeun Huh; Anna Lowit; Barbara Buckley; Michael Bartels; Kelly BéruBé; Daniel M Wilson; Ian Indans; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs for predicting heart, kidney and lung toxicities.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Autumn Bernal; Mark T D Cronin; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Candice Johnson; Raymond Kemper; Moiz Mumtaz; Louise Neilson; Manuela Pavan; Amy Pointon; Julia Pletz; Patricia Ruiz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Reena Sandhu; Markus Schaefer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-13

3.  Testing Chemical Safety: What Is Needed to Ensure the Widespread Application of Non-animal Approaches?

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Fiona Sewell; Kathryn Chapman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Opportunities to Apply the 3Rs in Safety Assessment Programs.

Authors:  Fiona Sewell; Joanna Edwards; Helen Prior; Sally Robinson
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2016-12

5.  Key Opportunities to Replace, Reduce, and Refine Regulatory Fish Acute Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Rachel Benstead; Kate Benyon; Mark Clook; Christopher Green; John Handley; Neil Harper; Samuel K Maynard; Chris Mead; Audrey Pearson; Kathryn Ryder; Dave Sheahan; Roger van Egmond; James R Wheeler; Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies.

Authors:  Fiona Sewell; Marco Corvaro; Amanda Andrus; Jonathan Burke; George Daston; Bryan Delaney; Jeanne Domoradzki; Carole Forlini; Maia Louise Green; Thomas Hofmann; Sven Jäckel; Moung Sook Lee; Michael Temerowski; Paul Whalley; Richard Lewis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.168

7.  In vitro prediction of clinical signs of respiratory toxicity in rats following inhalation exposure.

Authors:  E Da Silva; C Hickey; G Ellis; K S Hougaard; J B Sørli
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-21

8.  An adverse outcome pathway for lung surfactant function inhibition leading to decreased lung function.

Authors:  Emilie Da Silva; Ulla Vogel; Karin S Hougaard; Jesus Pérez-Gil; Yi Y Zuo; Jorid B Sørli
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.