Literature DB >> 26504585

Catheter detachment.

Takayo Ota1, Hiroshi Tsukuda1, Masahiro Tokunaga2, Norifumi Nishida3, Yoshikazu Hasegawa1, Tomohiro Suzumura1, Masahiro Fukuoka1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504585      PMCID: PMC4617418          DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omv038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports        ISSN: 2053-8855


× No keyword cloud information.
A 59-year-old woman presented with a venous drip infusion problem with her implanted venous infusion port. She was diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer and hospitalized to receive the best supportive care. She had poor peripheral venous access. Twenty-eight days prior to the drip infusion problem, she had a venous port implanted using the right subclavian vein to secure vascular access. The procedure was performed in an interventional radiology suite, and we confirmed the appropriate placement of the catheter. The venous port was used almost every day after it was implanted. On examination, her skin surface over the venous port was smooth. It was not red, and she did not feel any pain or tenderness in the area. However, upon attempting to flush the port with normal saline, we felt resistance and noted subcutaneous swelling. We discontinued the use of the implanted venous port. A simple chest radiograph revealed that the catheter (Fig. 1, black arrows) was disconnected from the port (Fig. 1, white arrowheads) and located in the superior vena cava. Subsequently, radiologists successfully removed the catheter via the inguinal vein. There were no complications because of the detached catheter. Catheter detachment is one of the most common complications of implantable venous access systems and has an incidence rate of 0.38–6% [1, 2]. This complication can happen over 1 year after port implantation [3]. A simple chest X-ray can easily reveal catheter detachment. To prevent further serious complications, such as cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial perforation [3], we must be cautious when using implantable venous infusion ports.
Figure 1:

Chest X-ray showing the detached catheter from the port.

Chest X-ray showing the detached catheter from the port.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.
  3 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Totally implantable central venous catheters of the port-a-cath type: complications due to its use in the treatment of cancer patients.

Authors:  Miroslav Granic; Darko Zdravkovic; Sandra Krstajic; Sanja Kostic; Aleksandar Simic; Momir Sarac; Nebojsa Ivanovic; Dragan Radovanovic; Srdjan Dikic; Vladimir Kovcin
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Port catheter fracture and migration in Internal Jugular Vein.

Authors:  Rudra Prasad Doley; Preetinder Brar; Sanchit Chaudhary; Rajeev Bedi; Adarsh Chander Swami; Jai Dev Wig
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.