Literature DB >> 26504325

The effects of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on Alzheimer's dementia patients memories.

Jung-Ha Hwang1, Hyun-Gyu Cha2, Young-Seok Cho3, Tae-Sue Kim3, Hyuk-Shin Cho4.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of the present study was to conduct Computer-Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation (COMCOG) to examine the effects of COMCOG on Alzheimer's dementia patients' memories. [Subjects] Thirty-five patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia received COMCOG for 30 minutes per day, five days per week for four weeks. [Methods] Before and after the COMCOG intervention, subjects' cognitive functions were evaluated using the Cognitive Assessment Reference Diagnosis System (CARDS) and Mini-Mental State Examination-Korea (MMSE-K) test.
[Results] According to the results of the evaluation, among the CARDS scores of the subjects who received COMCOG, the scores of the delayed 10-word list, delayed 10-object list, recognition 10-object, and recent memory significantly increased while the scores of recognition 10-word significantly decreased after intervention compared to before intervention. In addition, among the MMSE-K items, the orientation, registration, and recall showed significant increases.
[Conclusion] Based on these results, delay in the progress of memory deterioration can be expected when COMCOG is conducted for Alzheimer's dementia patients who show declines in cognitive functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s; Computer-Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation; Memory

Year:  2015        PMID: 26504325      PMCID: PMC4616126          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.27.2921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

In the case of Alzheimer’s dementia, cognitive disorders such as disorders in attention, start, plans, organization, problem solving ability, reasoning power, calculation ability, and memory appear before vascular dementia symptoms, such as motor or behavior disorders1). Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ characteristics are impairment of the explicit memory necessary to obtain and maintain new information and decline in memory which inhibits subjects ability to perform daily living activities2, 3). Cognitive rehabilitation intervention methods for dementia patients generally implemented at clinics include Computer-Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation (COMCOG), memory rehabilitation, cognitive stimulation, and psychological therapy2). Among them, COMCOG is currently used at clinics widely, and has the advantages of being easily adjusted to individual patients’ cognitive levels and accurate results and immediate feedback for judging the performance of patients2). In a study that conducted COMCOG for Alzheimer’s dementia patients, delay in the progress of cognitive function disorders was identified4). In another study, it was reported that after conducting COMCOG for Alzheimer’s dementia patients for four weeks, the number of errors in task performance decreased5). However, studies that have conducted COMCOG for Alzheimer’s dementia patients and examined its memory improvement effects have been are in South Korea. The purpose of the present study was to conduct COMCOG for Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ to examine its effects on memory and to provide basic data for the effects of COMCOG on Alzheimer’s dementia patients at clinics.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The present study was conducted with 35 in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s dementia. Criteria for selection of subjects for the present study were: a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) in the range of 0.5–2, a Mini-Mental State Examination-Korea (MMSE-K) score of 23 points or lower, and no history of neurological disease. Participants who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study received a general explanation of the procedures, and gave their written informed consent. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Cheongju University. The tester provided education before the intervention so that the subjects could learn to use computers and manipulate the mouse by themselves. The COMCOG program consists of items such as simple recognition memory, simple spatial memory, sequential recall memory, language recall memory, combined recall memory, language categorization memory, and language integration memory, and is intended to improve memories. This program was conducted for 30 minutes per day, five times per week for four weeks. The Cognitive Assessment Reference Diagnosis System (CARDS) is a cognitive test tool that includes individual tests consisting of seven memory test items and five non-memory test items. The five memory test items consist of recognition of 10 words, delayed 10-word list, recent memory, delayed 10-object list, and recognition of 10 objects. In the present study, to measure memories, memory-related tests of five items were conducted. The test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability were very high at 0.74–0.992). MMSE-K is the Korean version of a standardized cognitive evaluation tool and is a dementia screening tool used to evaluate elderly personscognitive disorders and whether they have dementia. It consists of a total of 12 questions with a maximum possible score of 30 points: 24 points or higher indicates a normal state, 20–23 points indicates suspected dementia, and 19 points or lower indicates dementia. The inter-rater reliability of this test tool is very high at 0.995). In the present study, data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 and the paired t-test was conducted to test average differences in memories between before and after intervention. Significance was accepted for values of p<0.05.

RESULTS

Thrity-five subjects participated in the present study, 14 males and 21 females. The subjects’ ages were distributed as follows: 60–69 years 5 (14.3%), 70–79 years 18 (51.4%), 80–89 years 11 (31.4%), 90 years or older 1 (2.9%). The number of subjects with CDR class 0.5 was 7 (20%), with class 1 was 17 (48.6%), and with class 2 was 11 (31.4%). The subjects’ dementia duration was 20.94±9.66 months and their average MMSE-K score was 16.63±4.35 points. After conducting COMCOG, among CARDS items, the scores of recognition of 10-words decreased significantly (p<0.01), while the scores of all the other variables increased significantly (p<0.01). Among MMSE-K items, orientation, registration, and recall showed significant increases (p<0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Pre- and post- intervention values of the CARDS and MMSE-K (N=35)

prepost
CARDS
Delayed 10-word list10.28 ± 14.64a23.71 ± 21.15***
Delayed 10-object list2.00 ± 5.3122.00 ± 19.37***
Recognition of 10 words34.00 ± 33.9714.00 ± 22.90**
Recognition of 10 objects34.57 ± 19.3052.00 ± 24.22***
Recent memory36.85 ± 28.5949.42 ± 26.22**
MMSE-K
Orientation4.71 ± 1.585.48 ± 2.68*
Registration2.48 ± 0.912.68 ± 0.79*
Recall1.00 ± 1.691.62 ± 2.01*
Language6.97 ± 1.527.00 ± 1.59
Attention and calculation1.45 ± 1.551.85 ± 1.68

aMean±SD, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 ***p<0.001, CARDS: Cognitive assessment reference diagnosis system; MMSE-K: Mini-mental state examination-Korea

aMean±SD, *p<0.05, **p<0.01 ***p<0.001, CARDS: Cognitive assessment reference diagnosis system; MMSE-K: Mini-mental state examination-Korea

DISCUSSION

In the present study, after conducting COMCOG, Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ CARDS scores of the delayed 10-word list, the delayed 10-object list, recognition of 10 objects, and recent memory items significantly increased. These results are consistent with the results of previous studies in which Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ memories were improved through COMCOG6). However, in the present study, the scores of recognition of 10 words, that is understanding the meanings of words, significantly decreased after intervention unlike the other items and it is our assumption that the characteristics of Alzheimer’s dementia are reflected in this result. These results are similar to the results of previous studies indicating that in the results of cognitive rehabilitation intervention, Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ scores in the recognition of 10 words item were shown to be lower than those of the general elderly persons or groups with other kinds of dementia, as Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ ability to distinguish between words and to accurately understand the meanings of words is impaired7). In the results of the present study, the scores of the delayed 10-word list item were increased by the intervention while the scores of the recognition of 10 words decreased. A likely reason for this is the characteristics of the evaluation. Recognition of 10 words requires an understanding of the relevant words to re-recognize the words, whereas in the delayed 10-word list only recall of words that were heard even if the words may not be properly understood8). Based on the results of previous studies of the characteristics of Alzheimer’s dementia patients, it is thought that the effects of COMCOG on Alzheimer’s dementia patients’ recognition of 10 words ability is lower than those on other kinds of memories. In a study conducted by Cipriani et al., it was reported that when COMCOG was conducted to 10 Alzheimer’s dementia patients, their MMSE scores significantly increased6). The results of the present study are similar and among the MMSE-K items, the memory item showed a significant increase. These results provide evidence that COMCOG is effective at improving memories of Alzheimer’s dementia patients. Based on these results, when in the deterioration of memories can be expected COMCOG is conducted for Alzheimer’s dementia patients showing declines in cognitive functions.
  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer's disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Giovanna Cipriani; Angelo Bianchetti; Marco Trabucchi
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Incidence and relative risk of dementia in an urban elderly population: findings of a prospective field study.

Authors:  H Bickel; B Cooper
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  Computer-based cognitive intervention for dementia: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E Galante; G Venturini; C Fiaccadori
Journal:  G Ital Med Lav Ergon       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep

4.  Interactive computer-training as a therapeutic tool in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Marc Hofmann; Alexander Rösler; Wolfram Schwarz; Franz Müller-Spahn; Kurt Kräuchi; Christoph Hock; Erich Seifritz
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 5.  Cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and dementia.

Authors:  Fang Yu; Karen M Rose; Sandra C Burgener; Cindy Cunningham; Linda L Buettner; Elizabeth Beattie; Ann L Bossen; Kathleen C Buckwalter; Donna M Fick; Suzanne Fitzsimmons; Ann Kolanowski; K Janet; Pringle Specht; Nancy E Richeson; Ingelin Testad; Sharon E McKenzie
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.254

6.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyu Cha; Sang-Goo Ji; Myoung-Kwon Kim; Jong-Sung Chang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-03-25
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  The effectiveness of ICT-based neurocognitive and psychosocial rehabilitation programmes in people with mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment using GRADIOR and ehcoBUTLER: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martina Vanova; Eider Irazoki; J Antonio García-Casal; Fernando Martínez-Abad; Cristina Botella; Kate R Shiells; Manuel A Franco-Martín
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  A comparison of the effects between 2 computerized cognitive training programs, Bettercog and COMCOG, on elderly patients with MCI and mild dementia: A single-blind randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Goo Joo Lee; Heui Je Bang; Kyoung Moo Lee; Hyun Ho Kong; Hyeun Suk Seo; Minwoo Oh; Miyeon Bang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Barriers to the implementation of a computer-based rehabilitation programme in two public psychiatric settings.

Authors:  Aline Ferreira-Correia; Tyler Barberis; Lerato Msimanga
Journal:  S Afr J Psychiatr       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.550

4.  The Effectiveness of GRADIOR: A Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Program for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia. Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial After 4 and 12 Months of Treatment.

Authors:  Angie A Diaz Baquero; Manuel A Franco-Martín; Esther Parra Vidales; José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán; Yolanda Bueno-Aguado; Fernando Martínez Abad; María V Perea Bartolomé; Aysan Mahmoudi Asl; Henriëtte G van der Roest
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 4.472

5.  Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program GRADIOR for mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment: new features.

Authors:  Manuel A Franco-Martín; Angie A Diaz-Baquero; Yolanda Bueno-Aguado; María T Cid-Bartolomé; Esther Parra Vidales; María V Perea Bartolomé; Isabel de la Torre Díez; Henriëtte G van der Roest
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Determinants of Adherence to a "GRADIOR" Computer-Based Cognitive Training Program in People with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Dementia.

Authors:  Angie A Diaz Baquero; María V Perea Bartolomé; José Miguel Toribio-Guzmán; Fernando Martínez-Abad; Esther Parra Vidales; Yolanda Bueno Aguado; Henriëtte G van der Roest; Manuel A Franco-Martín
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A tablet computer-based cognitive training program for young children with cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eun Jae Ko; In Young Sung; Jin Sook Yuk; Dae-Hyun Jang; Gijeong Yun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.