Literature DB >> 23584590

Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption.

Marissa Giustina1, Alexandra Mech, Sven Ramelow, Bernhard Wittmann, Johannes Kofler, Jörn Beyer, Adriana Lita, Brice Calkins, Thomas Gerrits, Sae Woo Nam, Rupert Ursin, Anton Zeilinger.   

Abstract

The violation of a Bell inequality is an experimental observation that forces the abandonment of a local realistic viewpoint--namely, one in which physical properties are (probabilistically) defined before and independently of measurement, and in which no physical influence can propagate faster than the speed of light. All such experimental violations require additional assumptions depending on their specific construction, making them vulnerable to so-called loopholes. Here we use entangled photons to violate a Bell inequality while closing the fair-sampling loophole, that is, without assuming that the sample of measured photons accurately represents the entire ensemble. To do this, we use the Eberhard form of Bell's inequality, which is not vulnerable to the fair-sampling assumption and which allows a lower collection efficiency than other forms. Technical improvements of the photon source and high-efficiency transition-edge sensors were crucial for achieving a sufficiently high collection efficiency. Our experiment makes the photon the first physical system for which each of the main loopholes has been closed, albeit in different experiments.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584590     DOI: 10.1038/nature12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection.

Authors:  M A Rowe; D Kielpinski; V Meyer; C A Sackett; W M Itano; C Monroe; D J Wineland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Violation of local realism with freedom of choice.

Authors:  Thomas Scheidl; Rupert Ursin; Johannes Kofler; Sven Ramelow; Xiao-Song Ma; Thomas Herbst; Lothar Ratschbacher; Alessandro Fedrizzi; Nathan K Langford; Thomas Jennewein; Anton Zeilinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Detection loophole in asymmetric bell experiments.

Authors:  Nicolas Brunner; Nicolas Gisin; Valerio Scarani; Christoph Simon
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency.

Authors:  Adriana E Lita; Aaron J Miller; Sae Woo Nam
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits.

Authors:  D N Matsukevich; P Maunz; D L Moehring; S Olmschenk; C Monroe
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev D Part Fields       Date:  1987-06-15

7.  Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.140

8.  Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.140

9.  Physics. Quantum mechanics braces for the ultimate test.

Authors:  Zeeya Merali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Highly efficient heralding of entangled single photons.

Authors:  Sven Ramelow; Alexandra Mech; Marissa Giustina; Simon Gröblacher; Witlef Wieczorek; Jörn Beyer; Adriana Lita; Brice Calkins; Thomas Gerrits; Sae Woo Nam; Anton Zeilinger; Rupert Ursin
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  27 in total

1.  Probing the interface theory of perception: Reply to commentaries.

Authors:  Donald D Hoffman; Manish Singh; Chetan Prakash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

2.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres.

Authors:  B Hensen; H Bernien; A E Dréau; A Reiserer; N Kalb; M S Blok; J Ruitenberg; R F L Vermeulen; R N Schouten; C Abellán; W Amaya; V Pruneri; M W Mitchell; M Markham; D J Twitchen; D Elkouss; S Wehner; T H Taminiau; R Hanson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Quantum physics: Death by experiment for local realism.

Authors:  Howard Wiseman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Quantum superposition at the half-metre scale.

Authors:  T Kovachy; P Asenbaum; C Overstreet; C A Donnelly; S M Dickerson; A Sugarbaker; J M Hogan; M A Kasevich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism.

Authors:  Lynden K Shalm; Evan Meyer-Scott; Bradley G Christensen; Peter Bierhorst; Michael A Wayne; Martin J Stevens; Thomas Gerrits; Scott Glancy; Deny R Hamel; Michael S Allman; Kevin J Coakley; Shellee D Dyer; Carson Hodge; Adriana E Lita; Varun B Verma; Camilla Lambrocco; Edward Tortorici; Alan L Migdall; Yanbao Zhang; Daniel R Kumor; William H Farr; Francesco Marsili; Matthew D Shaw; Jeffrey A Stern; Carlos Abellán; Waldimar Amaya; Valerio Pruneri; Thomas Jennewein; Morgan W Mitchell; Paul G Kwiat; Joshua C Bienfang; Richard P Mirin; Emanuel Knill; Sae Woo Nam
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Hybrid quantum logic and a test of Bell's inequality using two different atomic isotopes.

Authors:  C J Ballance; V M Schäfer; J P Home; D J Szwer; S C Webster; D T C Allcock; N M Linke; T P Harty; D P L Aude Craik; D N Stacey; A M Steane; D M Lucas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Atomic Hong-Ou-Mandel experiment.

Authors:  R Lopes; A Imanaliev; A Aspect; M Cheneau; D Boiron; C I Westbrook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Certified randomness in quantum physics.

Authors:  Antonio Acín; Lluis Masanes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Fair sampling perspective on an apparent violation of duality.

Authors:  Eliot Bolduc; Jonathan Leach; Filippo M Miatto; Gerd Leuchs; Robert W Boyd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The ultimate physical limits of privacy.

Authors:  Artur Ekert; Renato Renner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.