Literature DB >> 26502199

Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.

Rocío Rodríguez-Rey1, Jesús Alonso-Tapia1, Helena Hernansaiz-Garrido1.   

Abstract

Resilience is defined as the ability to recover from stress. However, all resilience measures with exception of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assess resources that make resilience possible instead of recovery. The purpose of this study was to translate the BRS to Spanish and to analyze the reliability and validity of its scores. The psychometric properties of its scores were examined in a heterogeneous sample of 620 Spanish adults. Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to study its scores' evidence of structural validity. Besides, to study its scores' evidence of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity in relation to other resilience questionnaires (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale 10-item version, Situated Subjective Resilience Questionnaire for Adults and Resiliency Questionnaire for Adults) and to variables such as emotions (Modified Differential Emotions Scale), coping (Person-situation Coping Questionnaire for Adults), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), posttraumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and posttraumatic stress (Davidson Trauma Scale), correlation and regression analyses were conducted. To study its sensitivity, we assessed the effect of sociodemographics and the ability of the scale to identify high-risk populations by conducting analyses of variance and Pearson correlations. The BRS scores showed adequate reliability (α = .83; intraclass coefficient = .69). Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the Spanish version of the BRS is mono-factorial (χ2/df = 2.36; standardized root mean square residual = .036; goodness-of-fit index = .980; comparative fit index = .984; incremental fit index = .984; root mean square error of approximation = .067). They also showed adequate evidence of the scores' convergent, concurrent and predictive validity. The Spanish version of the BRS is a reliable and valid means to assess resilience as the ability to bounce back. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26502199     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  36 in total

1.  Implementation of a Stress Intervention with Latino Immigrants in a Non-traditional Migration City.

Authors:  Farrah Jacquez; Lisa M Vaughn; Gabriela Suarez-Cano
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-04

2.  Predicting Posttraumatic Growth in Mothers and Fathers of Critically Ill Children: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rocío Rodríguez-Rey; Jesús Alonso-Tapia
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-09

3.  Morphological brain measures of cortico-limbic inhibition related to resilience.

Authors:  Arpana Gupta; Aubrey Love; Lisa A Kilpatrick; Jennifer S Labus; Ravi Bhatt; Lin Chang; Kirsten Tillisch; Bruce Naliboff; Emeran A Mayer
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Design and Implementation of the Puerto Rico Observational Study of Psychosocial, Environmental, and Chronic Disease Trends (PROSPECT).

Authors:  Josiemer Mattei; Katherine L Tucker; Luis M Falcón; Carlos F Ríos-Bedoya; Robert M Kaplan; H June O'Neill; Martha Tamez; Sigrid Mendoza; Claudia B Díaz-Álvarez; Jonathan E Orozco; Edna Acosta Pérez; José F Rodríguez-Orengo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem in the Relationship Between Resilience and Satisfaction with Life in Adolescent Students.

Authors:  Pablo Usán Supervía; Carlos Salavera Bordás; Alberto Quílez Robres
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Validity and reliability of the Mexican resilience measurement scale in families of children with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Filiberto Toledano-Toledano; José Moral de la Rubia; Laurie D McCubbin; Linda Liebenberg; Jesús Alejandro Vera Jiménez; Leonor Rivera-Rivera; Angie Hart; Leticia Andrea Barajas Nava; Marcela Salazar García; Silvia Martínez Valverde; Sofía Rivera Aragón; Concepción Sánchez Gómez; Laura Villavicencio Guzmán; Victor Granados García; Juan Garduño Espinosa
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Population-based validation of a German version of the Brief Resilience Scale.

Authors:  Andrea Chmitorz; Mario Wenzel; Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz; Angela Kunzler; Christiana Bagusat; Isabella Helmreich; Anna Gerlicher; Miriam Kampa; Thomas Kubiak; Raffael Kalisch; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mary Rodriguez-Rabassa; Ruthmarie Hernandez; Zindie Rodriguez; Claudia B Colon-Echevarria; Lizette Maldonado; Nelmit Tollinchi; Estefania Torres-Marrero; Adnil Mulero; Daniela Albors; Jaileene Perez-Morales; Idhaliz Flores; Julie Dutil; Heather Jim; Eida M Castro; Guillermo N Armaiz-Pena
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Measurement properties and implications of the Brief Resilience Scale in healthy workers.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Marianne W M C Six Dijkstra; Hendrik J Bieleman; Roy E Stewart; Michiel F Reneman; Frits G J Oosterveld; Karlein M G Schreurs
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample.

Authors:  Sai-Fu Fung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.