Literature DB >> 26501979

Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects.

Catherine Smyth1, Nadera Ahmadzai2, Jason Wentzell3, Ashley Pardoe4, Andrew Tse4, Tiffany Nguyen3, Yvette Goddard4, Shona Nair4, Patricia A Poulin5, Becky Skidmore6, Mohammed T Ansari7.   

Abstract

The intrathecal drug-delivery system (IDDS) is one mode of infusing analgesic medications directly into the cerebrospinal fluid in close proximity to their site of action. This modality has been employed in patients with refractory pain either due to malignant or non-malignant causes for over 30 years. Unfortunately, and despite the number of years it has been in use, there is still a scarcity of rigorous evidence to guide its integration into clinical practice. Current best evidence is inconclusive as to the comparative effectiveness and harms of the IDDS relative to routine medical care of patients. There are far more systematic reviews than high-quality primary comparative studies of the IDDS vs. conventional pain treatment. Existing clinical practice recommendations are best viewed as expert opinion with competing interests. This article will review the existing literature for indications, contraindications, consensus statements, different technologies, and complications of the IDDS. Although approved analgesics for IDDS delivery are limited to morphine and ziconotide, many other analgesics, alone or in combination, are routinely used in this setting. This review will also focus on the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of intrathecal medications extensively used in clinical practice; including agents approved, unapproved, and under development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26501979     DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0471-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  142 in total

1.  Administration of intraspinal morphine sulfate for the treatment of intractable cancer pain.

Authors:  A G Shetter; M N Hadley; E Wilkinson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  The evidence of neuraxial administration of analgesics for cancer-related pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  G P Kurita; K S Benthien; M Nordly; S Mercadante; P Klepstad; P Sjøgren
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.105

3.  The safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with programmable implanted intrathecal drug delivery systems: a 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jose De Andres; Vicente Villanueva; Stefano Palmisani; German Cerda-Olmedo; Maria Dolores Lopez-Alarcon; Vicente Monsalve; Ana Minguez; Vicente Martinez-Sanjuan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Movement-evoked breakthrough cancer pain despite intrathecal analgesia: a prospective series.

Authors:  E Bäckryd; B Larsson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Baclofen-enhanced spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal baclofen alone for neuropathic pain: Long-term outcome of a pilot study.

Authors:  Göran Lind; Gastón Schechtmann; Jaleh Winter; Björn A Meyerson; Bengt Linderoth
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition).

Authors:  Terese T Horlocker; Denise J Wedel; John C Rowlingson; F Kayser Enneking; Sandra L Kopp; Honorio T Benzon; David L Brown; John A Heit; Michael F Mulroy; Richard W Rosenquist; Michael Tryba; Chun-Su Yuan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  Deletion of vanilloid receptor 1-expressing primary afferent neurons for pain control.

Authors:  Laszlo Karai; Dorothy C Brown; Andrew J Mannes; Stephen T Connelly; Jacob Brown; Michael Gandal; Ofer M Wellisch; John K Neubert; Zoltan Olah; Michael J Iadarola
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Role of pretrial systemic opioid requirements, intrathecal trial dose, and non-psychological factors as predictors of outcome for intrathecal pump therapy: one clinician's experience with lumbar postlaminectomy pain.

Authors:  David Kim; Alik Saidov; Vijay Mandhare; Adam Shuster
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Opioid/Bupivacaine Mixture in Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: A Double Blind, Randomized, Crossover, Multicenter Study by the National Forum of Independent Pain Clinicians (NFIPC).

Authors:  Y Eugene Mironer; John C Haasis; Iva Chapple; Christopher Brown; John R Satterthwaite
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2002-10

Review 10.  The evolution of spinal/epidural neostigmine in clinical application: Thoughts after two decades.

Authors:  Gabriela Rocha Lauretti
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Fangfang Xing; R Jason Yong; Alan David Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 2.  Managing Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in the Elderly: Intrathecal Therapy.

Authors:  Barbara Kleinmann; Tilman Wolter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Evaluation of intrathecal drug delivery system for intractable pain in advanced malignancies: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shuyue Zheng; Liangliang He; Xiaohui Yang; Xiuhua Li; Zhanmin Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.