Literature DB >> 25684104

The evidence of neuraxial administration of analgesics for cancer-related pain: a systematic review.

G P Kurita1, K S Benthien2,3, M Nordly2,3, S Mercadante4,5, P Klepstad6,7, P Sjøgren2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present systematic review analysed the existing evidence of analgesic efficacy and side effects of opioids without and with adjuvant analgesics delivered by neuraxial route (epidural and subarachnoid) in adult patients with cancer.
METHODS: Search strategy was elaborated with words related to cancer, pain, neuraxial route, analgesic and side effects. The search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for the period until February 2014. Studies were analysed according to methods, results, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation.
RESULTS: The number of abstracts retrieved was 2147, and 84 articles were selected for full reading. The final selection comprised nine articles regarding randomised controlled trials (RCTs) divided in four groups: neuraxial combinations of opioid and adjuvant analgesic compared with neuraxial administration of opioid alone (n = 4); single neuraxial drug in bolus compared with continuous administration (n = 2); single neuraxial drug compared with neuraxial placebo (n = 1); and neuraxial opioid combined with or without adjuvant analgesic compared with other comprehensive medical management than neuraxial analgesics (n = 2). The RCTs presented clinical and methodological diversity that precluded a meta-analysis. They also presented several limitations, which reduced study internal validity. However, they demonstrated better pain control for all interventions analysed. Side effects were described, but there were few significant differences in favour of the tested interventions.
CONCLUSION: Heterogeneous characteristics and several methodological limitations of the studies resulted in evidence of low quality and a weak recommendation for neuraxial administration of opioids with or without adjuvant analgesics in adult patients with cancer.
© 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25684104     DOI: 10.1111/aas.12485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal Analgesia for Chronic Refractory Pain: Current and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Catherine Smyth; Nadera Ahmadzai; Jason Wentzell; Ashley Pardoe; Andrew Tse; Tiffany Nguyen; Yvette Goddard; Shona Nair; Patricia A Poulin; Becky Skidmore; Mohammed T Ansari
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain.

Authors:  Fangfang Xing; R Jason Yong; Alan David Kaye; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 3.  Cancer Pain Treatment Strategies in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 11.431

4.  Continuous Cervical Epidural Analgesia in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression.

Authors:  Mahesh Menon; Nafisa Taha; Navita Purohit; Vatsal Kothari; Shweta Singh
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.