| Literature DB >> 26500449 |
Senafikish Amsalu Feleke1, Muluadam Abebe Mulatu2, Yeshaneh Seyoum Yesmaw3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The significant impact of medication administration errors affect patients in terms of morbidity, mortality, adverse drug events, and increased length of hospital stay. It also increases costs for clinicians and healthcare systems. Due to this, assessing the magnitude and associated factors of medication administration error has a significant contribution for improving the quality of patient care. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and associated factors of medication administration errors among nurses at the Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital inpatient department.Entities:
Keywords: Developing country; Magnitude; Medication errors; Nurses
Year: 2015 PMID: 26500449 PMCID: PMC4618536 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-015-0099-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nurs ISSN: 1472-6955
Percentage Distribution of the study participants by Socio Demographic Characteristics, Bahir Dar FHRH inpatient departments, Northwest Ethiopia, March 2014
| Variables | Frequency | Percentage | Mean and SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | (100 %) | ||
| Sex | |||
| Male | 13 | 15.9 | |
| Female | 69 | 84.1 | |
| Age in year | |||
| 18–25 | 17 | 20.7 | |
| 26–30 | 36 | 43.9 | 31 ± 6.4 |
| 31–40 | 18 | 22.0 | |
| > 40 | 11 | 13.4 | |
| Educational status | |||
| Diploma | 70 | 85.4 | |
| BSc | 12 | 14.6 | |
| Religion | |||
| Orthodox | 76 | 92.7 | |
| Muslim | 3 | 3.7 | |
| Protestant | 3 | 3.7 | |
| Working experience in year | |||
| ≤ 10 | 54 | 65.9 | |
| > 10 | 28 | 34.1 |
Fig. 1Medication administration error categories in inpatient department of FHRH Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia, March 2014
Types of medication administration error and some observed examples in the inpatient departments of Bahir Dar FHRH, March 2014
| Type of MAEs | Some observed examples |
|---|---|
| Technique error | Mostly during administration, the nurses used only one glove for different patients and they are not changed the glove even if it has visible contamination. |
| Most of the nurses did not wash their hands before medication administration. | |
| Some of the nurses had not used safe wastage disposal system like they remain the injectable syringe and vial container at the patient bed. | |
| Wrong route | The observer observed while Insuline given intradermally instead of subcutaneous route. |
| Missed drug (doss) | Quinine mostly was run for more than 8 h instead of 4 h and the 2nd dose missed. |
| Methrindazole IV medication mostly missed at 2 PM. | |
| Time error | Most 6 PM medications were being given at 4:30 PM. |
| Documentation error | Most of the nurses did not document after administration of the drug. |
| If the nurses documented before administering the medications, they did not cancelled what they documented even if the patient refused or can’t afford to buy the drug. | |
| Dose error | Instead of administering 2 g of Ceftriaxone, the nurse administered 1 g. |
| Usually at pediatric ward, the nurse did not calculate the exact doses of medication. | |
| Unauthorized drug error | Instead of IV Ciprofloxaciline, IV Ceftriaxone was administered. |
Bivariate and Multivariate analysis of factors associated with medication administration error among nurses at FHRH inpatient department, Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia, March 2014 (n = 360)
| Variables | Medication administration error | OR with 95 % CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| Nurse’s age in year | ||||
| 18–25 | 52 | 29 | 2.6(1.29,5.02) | 2.9(1.65,6.38) |
| 26–30 | 83 | 48 | 2.5(1.33,4.55) | 2.3(1.55, 7.26) |
| 31–40 | 49 | 36 | 1.9(1.02,3.75) | 2.1(1.07,4.12) |
| > 40 | 26 | 37 | 1 | 1 |
| Educational status | ||||
| Diploma | 183 | 130 | 1.1(0.56,1.94) | a |
| BSC | 27 | 20 | 1 | |
| Working experience in years | ||||
| ≤ 10 | 146 | 89 | 1.6(1.24,4.88) | 1.7(1.33,4.99) |
| > 10 | 64 | 61 | 1 | 1 |
| Duration in the specific unit in month | ||||
| < 3 | 32 | 30 | 0.7(0.37,1.27) | a |
| 3–6 | 106 | 74 | 0.9(0.57,1.43) | |
| > 6 | 72 | 46 | 1 | |
| Nurse to patient ratio | ||||
| 1–6 | 57 | 52 | 1 | 1 |
| 7–10 | 93 | 56 | 1.5(1.39,3.88) | 1.6(1.44,3.19) |
| > 10 | 60 | 42 | 1.3(1.08,4.89) | 1.5(1.38,3.89) |
| Interruption during medication administration | ||||
| Yes | 132 | 83 | 1.4(1.09,3.09) | 1.5(1.14,3.21) |
| No | 78 | 67 | 1 | 1 |
| Time of medication administration | ||||
| 6 AM | 62 | 46 | 2.3(1.01,5.22) | a |
| 12 AM | 18 | 18 | 1.7(0.55,3.52) | |
| 2 PM | 29 | 29 | 1.7(0.98,5.57) | |
| 6 PM | 71 | 32 | 3.7(0.57,4.01) | |
| 10 PM | 10 | 13 | 1.3(0.67,2.45) | |
| 12 PM | 12 | 20 | 1 | |
| Shift of medication administration | ||||
| Night | 126 | 51 | 2.9(1.19,7.10) | 3.1(1.38,9.66) |
| Working time | 84 | 99 | 1 | 1 |
| Patient age in year | ||||
| < 18 | 50 | 22 | 1.6(1.05,3.16) | 2.3 (1.17,4.62) |
| ≥ 18 | 168 | 120 | 1 | 1 |
| Route of administration | ||||
| IV | 197 | 126 | 2.9(1.42,5.88) | a |
| Others (IM, PO and SC) | 13 | 24 | 1 | |
aNot significant in the multivariate analysis (back ward stepwise logistic regression)