Literature DB >> 26500167

Prognostication by inflammation-based score in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Hiroshi Kurahara1, Kosei Maemura2, Yuko Mataki2, Masahiko Sakoda2, Satoshi Iino2, Kiyokazu Hiwatashi2, Yota Kawasaki2, Takaaki Arigami2, Sumiya Ishigami2, Yuko Kijima2, Hiroyuki Shinchi3, Sonshin Takao4, Shoji Natsugoe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between inflammatory/immunonutritional status and patient prognosis has been reported in various types of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of inflammatory/immunonutritional factors as therapeutic predictors for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
METHODS: Ninety-six patients with histologically proven locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent CRT were enrolled in this study. We evaluated significance of inflammation-based factors as predictors of therapeutic effect and prognosis.
RESULTS: The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients was 10 and 18 months, respectively. A Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) of 2 and plasma fibrinogen levels ≥ 400 mg/dL were independent predictors of poor PFS and OS. A prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 45 was a predictor of a significantly better reduction rate of the primary tumor. The prognosis between patients with GPS 0/1 and fibrinogen <400 mg/dL, GPS 2 or fibrinogen ≥400 mg/dL, and GPS 2 and fibrinogen ≥400 mg/dL were significantly different. Patients with GPS 2 and/or plasma fibrinogen ≥ 400 mg/dL had significantly higher incidence of metastasis within 6 months after CRT.
CONCLUSIONS: GPS, fibrinogen, PNI are useful therapeutic and prognostic predictors in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with CRT.
Copyright © 2015 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier India Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Concomitant chemotherapy; Cox regression analysis; Inflammation; Pancreatic cancer; Prognostic score

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26500167     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  10 in total

1.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) as a prognostic immunonutritional biomarker for gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hirahara; Yoshitsugu Tajima; Yusuke Fujii; Shunsuke Kaji; Yasunari Kawabata; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Tetsu Yamamoto; Takahito Taniura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine: implication of inflammation-based scores.

Authors:  Inhwan Hwang; Jihoon Kang; Hei Nga Natalie Ip; Jae Ho Jeong; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Heung-Moon Chang; Changhoon Yoo; Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Prognostic Significance of PNI in Patients With Pancreatic Head Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Peng Jiang; Xiaocheng Li; Shupeng Wang; Yahui Liu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-01

4.  The prognostic value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Dianyun Ren; Xin Jin; Heshui Wu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  Patient-reported symptoms before palliative radiotherapy predict survival differences.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Thomas A Kämpe; Adam Pawinski; Astrid Dalhaug
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Prognostic significance of pretreatment plasma fibrinogen in patients with hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinomas: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Ji; Qian Ren; Suyang Bai; Yuping Wang; Yongning Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 9,839 patients.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Wanying Guo; Wei Xu; Xuelei Zhang; Zhijie Shi; Leizhen Zheng; Wenzhao Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Systemic combining inflammatory score (SCIS): a new score for prediction of oncologic outcomes in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Marina Di Mauro; Sebastiano Cimino; Giuseppe Morgia; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Abdal Rahman Abu Farhan; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Angelo Porreca; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Gian Maria Busetto; Francesco Del Giudice; Rodolfo Hurle; Sisto Perdonà; Marco Borghesi; Pierluigi Bove; Riccardo Autorino; Nicolae Crisan; Michele Marchioni; Luigi Schips; Francesco Soria; Andrea Mari; Andrea Minervini; Alessandro Veccia; Michele Battaglia; Daniela Terracciano; Gennaro Musi; Giovanni Cordima; Matteo Muto; Vincenzo Mirone; Ottavio de Cobelli; Giorgio Ivan Russo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

Review 9.  Aberrant Factors of Fibrinolysis and Coagulation in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lianghua Fang; Qing Xu; Jun Qian; Jin-Yong Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  The systemic-level repercussions of cancer-associated inflammation mediators produced in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Dolores Aguilar-Cazares; Rodolfo Chavez-Dominguez; Mario Marroquin-Muciño; Mario Perez-Medina; Jesus J Benito-Lopez; Angel Camarena; Uriel Rumbo-Nava; Jose S Lopez-Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.055

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.