Literature DB >> 26499502

The structural and process aspects of pharmacy quality: older adults' perceptions.

Olayinka O Shiyanbola, David A Mott, Kenneth D Croes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are increasingly playing an active role in healthcare and their definitions of healthcare quality are becoming more important to understand. The Donabedian model has been used to understand patients’ perceptions of quality in healthcare settings including hospitals and nursing homes; no research has applied the model to understand patients’ perceptions of pharmacy quality.
OBJECTIVE: To describe older adults’ perception of a quality pharmacy including their expectations of a quality pharmacy and their preferences in a quality pharmacy.
SETTING: Six focus groups held in community centers and senior residence facilities in Wisconsin.
METHODS: The design was a descriptive, exploratory study. Participants were adults 65 years and older who filled a prescription at a community pharmacy in the 90 days prior to being contacted. Donabedian’s assessment of healthcare quality based on ‘structure,’ ‘process’ and ‘outcome’ was used to organize and categorize the focus group themes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The focus groups explored older adults’ perceptions and expectations of a quality pharmacy. The factors that influenced their pharmacy choice were also examined. Results The older adults’ description of a quality pharmacy was based on the ‘structure’ and ‘process’ domain of the Donabedian model. However, most responses were focused on the ‘process’ domains and related to the application of patient-centered care (e.g., pharmacist interaction and communication) versus the structure domains (e.g., staff availability). The most frequently reported factor in the choice of pharmacies was the pharmacy’s location with some participants also reporting that their relationship and rapport with the pharmacist were also important. Older adults’ expectations were focused on the ‘process’ features of quality, including the provision of medication-related information, and the pharmacist facilitating medication safety and medication adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: In describing pharmacy quality, older adults mostly refer to the ‘process’ aspects of quality. Older adults perceive a quality pharmacy as one where the pharmacist provides patient-centered care. While location is important in pharmacy choices, the pharmacist’s patient-centeredness, and the quality features of the pharmacy are also relevant. Older adults’ expectations were related to their perception of a quality pharmacy. Pharmacists should publicize their pharmacies’ ‘process’ features in quality reporting systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26499502     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0211-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  21 in total

1.  Quality measurement: time to get serious.

Authors:  David P Nau
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

2.  What is quality anyway? Performance reports that clearly communicate to consumers the meaning of quality of care.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jessica Greene; Debbie Daniel
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Enrollees' global rating process of health care with the national CAHPS Benchmarking Database.

Authors:  Koichiro Otani
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?

Authors:  Jany Rademakers; Diana Delnoij; Dolf de Boer
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients.

Authors:  E Krupat; M Fancey; P D Cleary
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  A survey of Estonian consumer expectations from the pharmacy service and a comparison with the opinions of pharmacists.

Authors:  Peeter Villako; Ain Raal
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-05-12

Review 8.  Assessing the quality of pharmaceutical care. II. Application of concepts of quality assessment from medical care.

Authors:  K B Farris; D M Kirking
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements among older adults in the United States.

Authors:  Dima M Qato; G Caleb Alexander; Rena M Conti; Michael Johnson; Phil Schumm; Stacy Tessler Lindau
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  How to attract them and keep them: the pharmacy attributes that matter to Australian residents with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Adem Sav; Fiona Kelly; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2013-10-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Understanding and expectation towards pharmaceutical care among patients, caregivers and pharmacy service providers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hui Ming Margaret Low; Zu Yao See; Yi Feng Lai
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-08-10

2.  Using the Consumer Experience with Pharmacy Services Survey as a quality metric for ambulatory care pharmacies: older adults' perspectives.

Authors:  Olayinka O Shiyanbola; David A Mott; Kenneth D Croes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.