Literature DB >> 26499327

Prognostic significance of Traf2- and Nck- interacting kinase (TNIK) in colorectal cancer.

Hidenori Takahashi1, Toshiaki Ishikawa2, Megumi Ishiguro3, Satoshi Okazaki4, Kaoru Mogushi5, Hirotoshi Kobayashi6, Satoru Iida7, Hiroshi Mizushima8, Hiroshi Tanaka9, Hiroyuki Uetake10, Kenichi Sugihara11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potential of expression profiling using microarray analysis as a tool to predict the prognosis for different types of cancer has been realized. This study aimed to identify a novel biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC).
METHODS: The expression profiles of cancer cells in 152 patients with stage I-III CRC were examined using microarray analysis. High expression in CRC cells, especially in patients with distant recurrences, was a prerequisite to select candidate genes. Thus, we identified seventeen candidate genes, and selected Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase (TNIK), which was known to be associated with progression in CRC through Wnt signaling pathways. We analyzed the protein expression of TNIK using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and investigated the relationship between protein expression and patient characteristics in 220 stage I-III CRC patients.
RESULTS: Relapse-free survival was significantly worse in the TNIK high expression group than in the TNIK low expression group in stage II (p = 0.028) and stage III (p = 0.006) patients. In multivariate analysis, high TNIK expression was identified as a significant independent risk factor of distant recurrence in stage III patients.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to demonstrate the prognostic significance of intratumoral TNIK protein expression in clinical tissue samples of CRC, in that high expression of TNIK protein in primary tumors was associated with distant recurrence in stage II and III CRC patients. This TNIK IHC study might contribute to practical decision-making in the treatment of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26499327      PMCID: PMC4619995          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1783-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and the third leading cause of cancer death in Japan [1]. Although curative surgery is performed, approximately 30 % of CRC patients develop recurrences [2]. In particular, recurrences in distant organs or distant lymph nodes (distant recurrences) have a critical impact on the prognosis of CRC. The TNM classification system of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) has been used as a standard tool for prognostic stratification and has provided valuable information for therapeutic decision-making, such as the selection of suitable candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. However, TNM classification is limited in its ability to predict the exact prognosis of individual CRC patients. For further improvement in the prognosis for CRC patients and individualization of cancer therapy, molecular biological approaches have been intensely studied recently. Expression profiling using microarray analysis allows the exploration of several thousand cancer-related or cancer-specific genes in the search for candidate genes amenable to prognosis prediction and classification of human malignancies [3-5]. A number of genes that were poor prognostic markers have been identified in CRC patients (e.g., NUCKS1, BNIP3, PDGFC, OPG) using microarray analysis; their prognostic significance was subsequently assessed in surgically resected CRC subjects by mRNA and/or immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses [6-9]. In this study, we identified Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase (TNIK) using microarray analysis as a candidate gene that was related to distant recurrence of CRC. TNIK is a member of the germinal center kinase family, and is reported to be essential for Wnt signaling and CRC proliferation and progression [10, 11]. However, the correlation between intratumoral TNIK expression and the prognosis of CRC patients has not yet been reported. This study aimed to confirm the prognostic significance of TNIK in CRC through investigation of the relationship between intratumoral TNIK protein expression and the prognosis of CRC patients.

Methods

Patients

Primary tumors from 1210 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for CRC between 2002 and 2009 at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital were included in this study. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Study published by the Japanese government. The Ethical Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. A total of 152 patients were assigned to the microarray analysis, including 27 patients with stage I, 69 patients with stage II, 56 patients with stage III disease. Distant recurrences (not including local recurrences) occurred in 26 patients. Patient characteristics of these subjects for microarray analysis were shown in Additional file 1. The median follow-up time at the analysis was 60 months (range 15–76 months). For the protein expression analysis using immunohistochemistry (IHC), the different 220 patients were studied; 48, 87, and 85 patients with stage I, II, and III CRC, respectively. Distant recurrences occurred in 53 patients. The median follow-up time at the analysis was 61 months (range 1–141 months).

RNA extraction

Cancer tissues were immediately embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Japan, Tokyo, Japan) after surgical resection. Serial frozen sections of 9-μm thickness were mounted onto a foil-coated glass slide, 90 FOIL-SL25 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and laser capture microdissection (LCM) was carried out using the Application Solutions Laser Capture Microdissection System (Leica Microsystems). Total RNA from LCM of cancer tissues and normal colorectal epithelia were extracted using the RNeasy mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The integrity of the obtained total RNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA), and samples with an RNA integrity number greater than 5.0 were used for microarray analysis.

Oligonucleotide microarray analysis

cRNA was prepared from 100 ng total RNA using two-cycle target labeling and a control reagents kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Hybridization and signal detection of the Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix) were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The gene expression data was deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession ID GSE71222 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?token=izcnsaygjjkpped&acc=GSE71222). The gene expression data were then analyzed to identify the candidate genes related to distant recurrence. We defined the patients with distant recurrence as the recurrence group, and the patients without any distant recurrences as the non-recurrence group. The criteria to select candidate genes were as follows; (i) a higher expression level in cancer tissues than in non-cancerous mucosa, (ii) a significantly higher expression level in cancer cells of the recurrence group than in the non-recurrence group. A higher expression was defined as a numerical value 1.5 times greater than those in another group.

Immunohistochemistry

A streptavidin-biotin method was used for TNIK immunostaining. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from each patient were cut at 4-μm thickness. After deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration through a series of incubations in decreasing concentrations of ethanol, antigens were retrieved from the tissues by autoclaving them at 121 °C for 2 min in pH 8.0 citrate buffer. The sections were then incubated in a solution of 3 % hydrogen peroxide in 100 % methanol for 15 min at room temperature in order to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Nonspecific binding was blocked by treating the tissues with 10 % normal goat serum (Nichirei Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) for 15 min. Thereafter, the slides were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against TNIK at a 1:400 dilution (HPA012128; Sigma-Aldrich, Co. LLC., St Louis, MO) for 30 min at room temperature and for overnight at 4 °C. Next, sections were incubated with labeled polymer [Histofine® Simple Stain MAX PO (MULTI); Nichirei Bioscience] for 30 min at room temperature. Color development was carried out with DAB (0.02 % 3, 30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride; Nichirei Bioscience) for 7 min at room temperature. The slides were counterstained with 1 % Mayer’s hematoxylin, after which they were dehydrated using a series of increasing alcohol concentrations, immersed in xylene, and finally coverslipped. All sections were scored by two investigators. The staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), or 3 (strong). The staining extensity was scored as 1 (0–10 % of the tumor cells stained), 2 (11–40 %), 3 (41–70 %), or 4 (71–100 %). The sum of the intensity and extensity scores, potentially ranging from 1 to 7, was calculated, and the average of three fields (magnification 100×) that were strongly stained at the tumor front were used to determine the TNIK IHC-staining score for each patient.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 17.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). To estimate the significance of differences between the groups, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann–Whitney U test, and χ2 test were used where appropriate. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from the date of surgery to distant recurrence. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgery to death from any cause. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and curves were compared using the log-rank test. Factors affecting RFS and OS were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Microarray analysis

In the microarray analysis, 69 genes were identified that fulfilled the above-mentioned criteria. The heat map of 69 genes is shown in Additional file 2. Among 69 genes, 17 genes were reported to be associated with human malignancies. The list of selected 17 genes is shown in Additional file 3. Among 17 candidate genes, we focused on 5 genes (S100A2, TNIK, TESC, PROX1 and ZBED6) which reported to be associated with colorectal cancer. Another researcher in our laboratory is submitting a paper about S100A2. TESC, PROX1 and ZBED6 are being researched now. We selected TNIK as a target gene for further analysis for the following reasons; (i) TNIK is known to be associated with the progression of CRC through Wnt signaling pathways [10, 11], (ii) TNIK gene amplification was reported to be required for the progression of gastric cancer, and nuclear expression of TNIK in hepatocellular carcinoma was reported to be associated with poor prognosis [12, 13], (iii) the correlation between the expression levels of TNIK in CRC patients and their clinical outcomes have not been revealed. Co-expression analysis of 69 genes was performed using STRING DATA BASE (http://string-db.org/). The co-expression networks are shown in Additional file 4. Although some co-expression networks were observed, TNIK was not involved in those networks.

Expression of TNIK protein in CRC

Figure 1 shows the representative results of IHC staining of TNIK in CRC samples. TNIK protein was observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells, but not in normal epithelial cells. The entire tumor cross-section showed heterogeneous staining; however, the staining tended to be strong at the invasive tumor front. Therefore, we focused on TNIK expression at the invasive tumor front, and used the staining scores at the invasive tumor front in further analysis.
Fig. 1

TNIK immunostaining in representative CRC and normal colorectal epithelium. a Examining the entire tumor cross-section revealed that TNIK staining was heterogeneous. b (a) 0 no staining; (b) 1+ weak staining; (c) 2+ moderate staining; (d) 3+ strong staining; (e) normal epithelium staining

TNIK immunostaining in representative CRC and normal colorectal epithelium. a Examining the entire tumor cross-section revealed that TNIK staining was heterogeneous. b (a) 0 no staining; (b) 1+ weak staining; (c) 2+ moderate staining; (d) 3+ strong staining; (e) normal epithelium staining

TNIK expression and patient characteristics

The median of the staining score of the 220 CRC patients studied was 5.3 (range 1-7). The scoring cut-off point was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. This was conducted for TNIK staining scores in comparison with CRC distant recurrence. The experimental samples were divided into 2 groups by the cut-off score: the low expression group (staining score < 6, n = 139) and the high expression group (staining score ≥ 6, n = 81). Relationships between TNIK expression and patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. T4, right-sided colon cancer, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion were significantly associated with high expression of TNIK. Samples from patients who developed distant recurrences showed higher TNIK expression than those from patients without distant recurrence.
Table 1

Patient characteristics and TNIK expression in stage I-III CRC patients

VariablesTNIK expressionp value
Low (n = 139)High (n = 81)
Age< 70 years98530.435
≥ 70 years4128
Gendermale88600.102
female5121
Histology (TNM 7th)G162280.258
G27046
G377
Tumor locationright-sided colon26280.016
left-sided colon5822
rectum5531
Stage (TNM 7th)I36120.104
II5532
III4837
Depth of tumor invasion (TNM 7th)T1176T1-3 vs. T4 0.002
T23211
T35829
T43235
Lymphatic invasion(-)50170.021
(+)8964
Venous invasion(-)2760.020
(+)11275
Lymph node metastasis(-)91440.102
(+)4837
CEA*1< 5 ng/ml101520.189
≥ 5 ng/ml3829
Distant recurrence(-)11849< 0.001
(+)2132

CEA* carcinoembryonic antigen

Patient characteristics and TNIK expression in stage I-III CRC patients CEA* carcinoembryonic antigen

TNIK expression and prognosis of CRC patients

Figure 2a and 2b show RFS and OS curves stratified by TNIK expression group. RFS as well as OS in the TNIK high expression group was significantly worse (p < 0.001 log-rank test) than in those in the TNIK low expression group.
Fig. 2

a RFS and (b) OS curves of 220 stage I-III CRC patients stratified by TNIK expression

a RFS and (b) OS curves of 220 stage I-III CRC patients stratified by TNIK expression In the univariate analysis, advanced age (≥70 years), poorly differentiated histology, T4, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph node metastasis, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and high TNIK expression were significantly associated with worse RFS. In the multivariate analysis, high TNIK expression, lymph node metastasis, and advanced age were identified as independent factors associated with worse RFS (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables affecting A: RFS and B: OS in patients with stage I-III CRC

VariablesNo. PatientsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95 % CI)p valueHazard ratio (95 % CI)p value
≪RFS≫
 Age< 70 years1510.614 (0.377–0.988)0.0491.849 (1.115–3.067)0.017
≥ 70 years69
 Gendermale1481.709 (0.974–2.996)0.062
female72
 Histology (TNM 7th)G1900.485 (0.285–0.826)0.0081.555 (0.884–2.737)0.125
G2, G3130
 Tumor locationcolon1341.473 (0.911–2.382)0.114
rectum86
 Depth of tumor invasion (TNM 7th)T1-31532.713 (1.342–3.520)0.0021.061 (0.616–1.827)0.832
T467
 Lymphatic invasion(-)672.647 (1.386–5.054)0.0031.344 (0.643–2.809)0.432
(+)153
 Venous invasion(-)333.260 (1.186–8.959)0.0221.334 (0.457–3.893)0.598
(+)187
 Lymph node metastasis(-)1353.316 (2.018–5.447)< 0.0012.326 (1.276–4.243)0.006
(+)85
 CEA< 5 ng/ml1532.239 (1.379–3.634)0.0011.498 (0.907–2.473)0.114
≥ 5 ng/ml67
 TNIK expressionlow1392.762 (1.694–4.502)< 0.0012.184 (1.310–3.641)0.003
high81
VariablesNo. PatientsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95 % CI)p valueHazard ratio (95 % CI)p value
≪OS≫
 Age< 70 years1512.842 (1.589–5.083)< 0.0012.887 (1.559–5.343)0.001
≥ 70 years69
 Gendermale1480.451 (0.218–0.936)0.0320.598 (0.281–1.272)0.182
female72
 Histology (TNM 7th)G1902.046 (1.076–3.889)0.0291.572 (0.788–3.137)0.199
G2, G3130
 Tumor locationcolon1341.301 (0.726–2.332)0.376
rectum86
 Depth of tumor invasion (TNM 7th)T1-31533.047 (1.706–5.440)< 0.0011.693 (0.865–3.314)0.124
T467
 Lymphatic invasion(-)672.368 (1.104–5.077)0.0271.226 (0.517–2.909)0.643
(+)153
 Venous invasion(-)334.483 (1.086–18.500)0.0381.709 (0.385–7.591)0.481
(+)187
 Lymph node metastasis(-)1352.582 (1.435–4.648)0.0021.505 (0.733–3.093)0.266
(+)85
 CEA< 5 ng/ml1532.608 (1.461–4.657)0.0011.692 (0.929–3.082)0.086
≥ 5 ng/ml67
 TNIK expressionlow1393.373 (1.838–6.192)< 0.0012.279 (1.205–4.310)0.011
high81

CI confidence interval

Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables affecting A: RFS and B: OS in patients with stage I-III CRC CI confidence interval With respect to OS, univariate analysis indicated that advanced age, female gender, poorly differentiated histology, T4, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, lymph node metastasis, elevated CEA level, and high TNIK expression were significantly associated with worse OS. High expression of TNIK and advanced age were identified as independent factors associated with worse OS by multivariate analysis (Table 2).

TNIK expression and prognosis of stage II and III patients

Figure 3 shows RFS curves stratified by TNM-7th stage and TNIK expression group.
Fig. 3

RFS curves stratified by TNM-7th stage and TNIK expression

RFS curves stratified by TNM-7th stage and TNIK expression RFS curves were clearly separated by stage subgroup, and were also significantly separated by TNIK expression group in both stage II and III patients. RFS was significantly worse in the TNIK high expression group than in the TNIK low expression group in stage II (p = 0.028) and stage III (p = 0.006). In the multivariate analysis, high TNIK expression was identified as a statistically significant and independent risk factor of distant recurrence in stage III patients, but not reached statistical significance in stage II (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables affecting RFS in patients with A: stage II CRC and B: stage III CRC

VariablesNo. PatientsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95 % CI)p valueHazard ratio (95 % CI)p value
≪stage II≫
 Age< 70 years532.984 (1.249–7.130)0.0142.798 (1.168–6.702)0.021
≥ 70 years34
 Gendermale530.506 (0.198–1.294)0.155
female34
 Histology (TNM 7th)G1361.041 (0.445–2.438)0.926
G2, G351
 Tumor locationcolon571.723 (0.744–3.989)0.204
rectum30
 Depth of tumor invasion (TNM 7th)T1-3621.269 (0.517–3.115)0.603
T425
 Lymphatic invasion(-)361.292 (0.541–3.083)0.564
(+)51
 Venous invasion(-)111.550 (0.362–6.635)0.555
(+)76
 Examined lymph nodes< 12210.820 (0.321–2.097)0.679
≥ 1266
 CEA< 5 ng/ml621.153 (0.450–2.954)0.767
≥ 5 ng/ml25
 TNIK expressionlow552.511 (1.073–5.877)0.0342.323 (0.990–5.452)0.053
high32
VariablesNo. PatientsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95 % CI)p valueHazard ratio (95 % CI)p value
≪stage III≫
 Age< 70 years601.032 (0.536–1.988)0.925
≥ 70 years25
 Gendermale600.681 (0.334–1.385)0.289
female25
 Histology (TNM 7th)G1241.838 (0.878–3.846)0.106
G2, G361
 Tumor locationcolon481.540 (0.839–2.824)0.163
rectum37
 Depth of tumor invasion (TNM 7th)T1-3431.3080.388
T442
 Lymphatic invasion(-)40.706
(+)81
 Venous invasion(-)30.570
(+)82
 Lymph node metastasis (TNM 7th)N1480.194
N237
 CEA< 5 ng/ml471.918 (1.042–3.530)0.0361.678 (0.903–3.120)0.102
≥ 5 ng/ml38
 TNIK expressionlow482.345 (1.256–4.378)0.0072.141 (1.136–4.038)0.019
high37
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinicopathologic variables affecting RFS in patients with A: stage II CRC and B: stage III CRC

Discussion

This study is the first to demonstrate the prognostic significance of intratumoral TNIK protein expression in clinical tissue samples of CRC. Here, we found that there were some significant correlations between intratumoral TNIK protein expression and clinicopathologic features in CRC patients, with high TNIK expression being a significant prognostic factor of distant recurrence after curative surgery for stage II and III CRC. TNIK is one of the germinal center kinase family members involved in cytoskeleton organization and neural dendrite extension [14-16], and is reported to be associated with the progression of several human cancers [12, 13]. Wnt signaling maintains the undifferentiated state of intestinal crypt cells through the T-cell for factor 4 (TCF4)/β-catenin-activating transcriptional complex. In CRC, activating mutations in Wnt pathway components lead to inappropriate activation of the TCF4/β-catenin transcriptional program and carcinogenesis [10]. Activation of the Wnt signaling cascade leads to disruption of the β-catenin degradation complex, resulting in β-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm. β-catenin translocates to the nucleus, where it serves as a transcription factor to activate downstream target genes by binding to TCF4 [17-19]. TNIK is activated by β-catenin at the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus. Then, activated TNIK directly binds with both TCF4 and β-catenin and phosphorylates TCF4. The kinase activity of TNIK may be essential in TCF/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF)-driven transcriptional activation of Wnt signaling pathways [11]. In the present study, high expression of TNIK was significantly associated with tumor depth (T4), lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. This result suggests that elevated expression of TNIK may accelerate tumor progression and invasion. We found that TNIK staining tended to be stronger at the invasive tumor front than at the tumor marginal site. The balance of pro- and anti-tumor factors at the invasive tumor front is reported to be decisive in determining tumor progression and the clinical outcome of patients with CRC [20, 21]. Our results supported the idea that high expression of TNIK at the invasive tumor front might play an important role in progression and distant metastasis of CRC. Classification of risk of recurrence is intensively studied in the field of cancer treatment, because of its importance in treatment decision-making. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III CRC is internationally accepted as a standard care for improving survival. de Gramont et al. indicated that stage III consists of subgroups of patients with various risks of recurrence, and proposed selecting treatment regimens from several options according to risk subgroup-specific survival data [22, 23]. On the basis of our results, stage III CRC patients with high TNIK expression may require strong adjuvant chemotherapy. For stage II disease, major western guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy when patients have risk factors including T4 lesions, less than 12 lymph nodes examined, perforation, poorly differentiated histology, and lymphovascular involvement, even though the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRC has not been well-established and remains controversial [24]. Our results proposed that stage II CRC patients with high TNIK expression might be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy as high-risk patients of distant recurrence. Furthermore, the development of novel therapies that target critical biological pathways has greatly expanded treatment options for patients with CRC and resulted in substantial improvements in survival in the last decade [25, 26]. The Wnt signaling pathway has arisen as a target, and development of a new drugs targeting TNIK for CRC is in progress both in Japan and western country [27, 28].

Conclusions

High expression of TNIK protein in primary tumors was associated with distant recurrence in stage II and III CRC patients. This TNIK IHC study might contribute to practical decision-making in treatment for these patients.
  39 in total

1.  Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase is essential for Wnt signaling and colorectal cancer growth.

Authors:  Miki Shitashige; Reiko Satow; Takafumi Jigami; Kazunori Aoki; Kazufumi Honda; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Masaya Ono; Setsuo Hirohashi; Tesshi Yamada
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Clinical significance of osteoprotegerin expression in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Satoru Iida; Megumi Ishiguro; Kaoru Mogushi; Hiroshi Mizushima; Hiroyuki Uetake; Hiroshi Tanaka; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  From chemotherapy to targeted therapy in adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  Aimery de Gramont; Armand de Gramont; Benoist Chibaudel; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Annette K Larsen; Christophe Tournigand; Christophe Louvet; Thierry André
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  p15RS/RPRD1A (p15INK4b-related sequence/regulation of nuclear pre-mRNA domain-containing protein 1A) interacts with HDAC2 in inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Authors:  Chunxiao Liu; Yanquan Zhang; Jun Li; Yinyin Wang; Fangli Ren; Yifan Zhou; Yinyuan Wu; Yarui Feng; Yu Zhou; Fuqin Su; Baoqing Jia; Dong Wang; Zhijie Chang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  High-mobility group A2 overexpression is an unfavorable prognostic biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Zhuoxing Liu; Kunpeng Wu; Zhixiong Yang; Aibing Wu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 6.  Expression profiling by microarrays in colorectal cancer (Review).

Authors:  Warren Shih; Runjan Chetty; Ming-Sound Tsao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Methylated BNIP3 gene in colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Sayaka Shimizu; Satoru Iida; Megumi Ishiguro; Hiroyuki Uetake; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Yoko Takagi; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Tetsuro Higuchi; Masayuki Enomoto; Kaoru Mogushi; Hiroshi Mizushima; Hiroshi Tanaka; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  The Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase as a putative effector of Rap2 to regulate actin cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Kiyohito Taira; Masato Umikawa; Kimiko Takei; Bat-Erdene Myagmar; Manabu Shinzato; Noriko Machida; Hiroshi Uezato; Shigeo Nonaka; Ken-ichi Kariya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  A missense polymorphism in ATF6 gene is associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma probably by altering ATF6 level.

Authors:  Xiaopan Wu; Zhenhui Xin; Wei Zhang; Sujun Zheng; Jia Wu; Kangmei Chen; Huifen Wang; Xilin Zhu; Zhuo Li; Zhongping Duan; Hui Li; Ying Liu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  The essential role of TNIK gene amplification in gastric cancer growth.

Authors:  D-H Yu; X Zhang; H Wang; L Zhang; H Chen; M Hu; Z Dong; G Zhu; Z Qian; J Fan; X Su; Y Xu; L Zheng; H Dong; X Yin; Q Ji; J Ji
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 7.485

View more
  14 in total

1.  TNIK Inhibition Has Dual Synergistic Effects on Tumor and Associated Immune Cells.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; Juhyun Oh; Hannah M Peterson; Jonathan C T Carlson; Mikael J Pittet; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Adv Biol (Weinh)       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Large-Scale Analysis of Gene Expression Data Reveals a Novel Gene Expression Signature Associated with Colorectal Cancer Distant Recurrence.

Authors:  Nehad M Alajez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Emergence of TNIK inhibitors in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Tesshi Yamada; Mari Masuda
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 4.  Improving diagnosis, prognosis and prediction by using biomarkers in CRC patients (Review).

Authors:  Taxiarchis Konstantinos Nikolouzakis; Loukia Vassilopoulou; Persefoni Fragkiadaki; Theodoros Mariolis Sapsakos; Georgios Z Papadakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristides M Tsatsakis; John Tsiaoussis
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.136

5.  Pharmacological blockage of transforming growth factor-β signalling by a Traf2- and Nck-interacting kinase inhibitor, NCB-0846.

Authors:  Teppei Sugano; Mari Masuda; Fumitaka Takeshita; Noriko Motoi; Toru Hirozane; Naoko Goto; Shigeki Kashimoto; Yuko Uno; Hideki Moriyama; Masaaki Sawa; Yuichi Nagakawa; Akihiko Tsuchida; Masahiro Seike; Akihiko Gemma; Tesshi Yamada
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Identification of TNIK as a novel potential drug target in thyroid cancer based on protein druggability prediction.

Authors:  Yi-Fei Yang; Bin Yu; Xiu-Xia Zhang; Yun-Hua Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Direct conversion of osteosarcoma to adipocytes by targeting TNIK.

Authors:  Toru Hirozane; Mari Masuda; Teppei Sugano; Tetsuya Sekita; Naoko Goto; Toru Aoyama; Takato Sakagami; Yuko Uno; Hideki Moriyama; Masaaki Sawa; Naofumi Asano; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Robert Nakayama; Tadashi Kondo; Akira Kawai; Eisuke Kobayashi; Tesshi Yamada
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-02-08

8.  A novel mesenchymal-associated transcriptomic signature for risk-stratification and therapeutic response prediction in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takatoshi Matsuyama; Raju Kandimalla; Toshiaki Ishikawa; Naoki Takahashi; Yasuhide Yamada; Masamichi Yasuno; Yusuke Kinugasa; Torben Frøstrup Hansen; Marwan Fakih; Hiroyuki Uetake; Balázs Győrffy; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 7.316

Review 9.  Current Tissue Molecular Markers in Colorectal Cancer: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Gaia Peluso; Paola Incollingo; Armando Calogero; Vincenzo Tammaro; Niccolò Rupealta; Gaetano Chiacchio; Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo; Gianluca Minieri; Antonio Pisani; Eleonora Riccio; Massimo Sabbatini; Umberto Marcello Bracale; Concetta Anna Dodaro; Nicola Carlomagno
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Hippo pathway affects survival of cancer patients: extensive analysis of TCGA data and review of literature.

Authors:  Anello Marcello Poma; Liborio Torregrossa; Rossella Bruno; Fulvio Basolo; Gabriella Fontanini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.