Literature DB >> 15051756

Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes' B colon cancer.

Yixin Wang1, Tim Jatkoe, Yi Zhang, Matthew G Mutch, Dmitri Talantov, John Jiang, Howard L McLeod, David Atkins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 5-year survival rate of patients with Dukes' B colon cancer is approximately 75%. Identification of the patients at high risk of recurrence in this group would allow better staging and more informed use of adjuvant chemotherapy. In this study, we used DNA chip technology to systematically identify new prognostic markers for tumor relapse in Dukes' B patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Affymetrix U133a GeneChip containing approximately 22,000 transcripts (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), RNA samples from 74 patients with Dukes' B colon cancer were analyzed. Thirty-one patients developed tumor relapse in less than 3 years, whereas 43 patients remained disease-free for more than 3 years after surgery. Two supervised class prediction approaches were used to identify gene markers that can best discriminate between patients who would experience relapse and patients who would remain disease-free. A multivariate Cox model was built to predict recurrence.
RESULTS: Gene expression profiling identified a 23-gene signature that predicts recurrence in Dukes' B patients. This signature was validated in 36 independent patients. The overall performance accuracy was 78%. Thirteen of 18 relapse patients and 15 of 18 disease-free patients were predicted correctly, giving an odds ratio of 13 (95% CI, 2.6 to 65; P =.003). The log-rank test indicated a significant difference in disease-free time between the predicted relapse and disease-free patients (P =.0001).
CONCLUSION: The clinical value of these markers is that the patients at a high predicted risk of relapse (13-fold risk) could be upstaged to receive adjuvant therapy, similar to Dukes' C patients. Our data highlight the feasibility of a prognostic assay that could focus more intensive treatment for localized colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15051756     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  157 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

2.  Integration of genetic signature and TNM staging system for predicting the relapse of locally advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junjie Peng; Zhimin Wang; Wei Chen; Yin Ding; Haifeng Wang; Hongjie Huang; Wei Huang; Sanjun Cai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  New trends in molecular and cellular biomarker discovery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Parisa Aghagolzadeh; Ramin Radpour
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Treatment for colorectal cancer should be based on genetic analysis.

Authors:  Claire Laurent
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

5.  Metastatic recurrence of early-stage colorectal cancer is linked to loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 4 and 14q.

Authors:  F Al-Mulla; S AlFadhli; A H Al-Hakim; J J Going; M S Bitar
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Is there a genetic signature for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Cristina Nadal; Joan Maurel; Pere Gascon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Guanylyl cyclase C as a biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

8.  Identification of novel stem cell markers using gap analysis of gene expression data.

Authors:  Paul M Krzyzanowski; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  Genomic markers for decision making: what is preventing us from using markers?

Authors:  Vicky M Coyle; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: The Role of Molecular Markers in Choosing Therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Chun; Zev A Wainberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.