Literature DB >> 26498908

Factors influencing the decision of older adults to be assessed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An exploratory study.

Sandra B Lauck1,2, Jennifer Baumbusch2, Leslie Achtem3, Jacqueline M Forman3, Sandra L Carroll4, Anson Cheung3,2, Jian Ye3,2, David A Wood3,2, John G Webb3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the recommended therapy for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at increased surgical risk and likely to derive benefit. Multimodality and multidisciplinary assessment is required for the heart team to determine eligibility for TAVI in a primarily older population. Little is known about patients' motivation and perspectives on making the decision to undergo the complex assessment. AIMS: To explore factors influencing patients' decision making to undergo TAVI eligibility assessment to inform practice, programme development, health policy and future research.
METHODS: An exploratory qualitative approach was used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 patients at the time of their referral for assessment to a quaternary cardiac and high volume TAVI centre.
RESULTS: Multiple, intersecting factors that included biomedical, functional, social and environmental considerations influenced patients' decision. The six distinct factors were symptom burden, participants' perception as 'experienced' patients, expectations of benefit and risks, healthcare system and informal support, logistical barriers and facilitators, and obligations and responsibilities.
CONCLUSIONS: The decision to undergo TAVI eligibility assessment is multifaceted and complex. Programmatic processes of care must be in place to facilitate appropriate and patient-centered decision making and access to TAVI. Strategies are required to mitigate the risks associated with the rapid deterioration of severe aortic stenosis, address patient and referring physicians' education needs, and provide individualised care and equitable access. Future research must focus on patients' experiences throughout the trajectory of TAVI care. © The European Society of Cardiology 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; decision support; elderly; patient experience; transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26498908     DOI: 10.1177/1474515115612927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


  9 in total

1.  Health Literacy in the Context of Implant Care-Perspectives of (Prospective) Implant Wearers on Individual and Organisational Factors.

Authors:  Constanze Hübner; Mariya Lorke; Annika Buchholz; Stefanie Frech; Laura Harzheim; Sabine Schulz; Saskia Jünger; Christiane Woopen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Transition to palliative care when transcatheter aortic valve implantation is not an option: opportunities and recommendations.

Authors:  Sandra B Lauck; Jennifer A Gibson; Jennifer Baumbusch; Sandra L Carroll; Leslie Achtem; Gil Kimel; Cindy Nordquist; Anson Cheung; Robert H Boone; Jian Ye; David A Wood; John G Webb
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  Patients' experiences of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation trajectory: A grounded theory study.

Authors:  Karin Olsson; Ulf Näslund; Johan Nilsson; Åsa Hörnsten
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-02-04

4.  Prevalence, predictors, and prognostic implications of residual impairment of functional capacity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdelghani; Rafael Cavalcante; Yosuke Miyazaki; Robbert J de Winter; Rogério Sarmento-Leite; José A Mangione; Alexandre Abizaid; Pedro A Lemos; Patrick W Serruys; Fabio S de Brito
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Conditions for autonomous choice: a qualitative study of older adults' experience of decision-making in TAVR.

Authors:  Elisabeth Skaar; Anette Hylen Ranhoff; Jan Erik Nordrehaug; Daniel E Forman; Margrethe Aase Schaufel
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Exploring the synergies between focused ethnography and integrated knowledge translation.

Authors:  Jennifer Baumbusch; Sarah Wu; Sandra B Lauck; Davina Banner; Tamar O'Shea; Leslie Achtem
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-11-03

7.  From Rapid Recommendation to Online Preference-Sensitive Decision Support: The Case of Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Jack Dowie; Mette Kjer Kaltoft
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-29

8.  Patient values and preferences on transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement therapy for aortic stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lyubov Lytvyn; Gordon H Guyatt; Veena Manja; Reed A Siemieniuk; Yuan Zhang; Thomas Agoritsas; Per O Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Patient values and preferences on valve replacement for aortic stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anja Fog Heen; Lyubov Lytvyn; Michael Shapiro; Gordon Henry Guyatt; Reed Alexander Cunningham Siemieniuk; Yuan Zhang; Veena Manja; Per Olav Vandvik; Thomas Agoritsas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 5.994

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.