| Literature DB >> 26497894 |
Maya Bassil1, Costantine F Daher2, Mohammad Mroueh3, Nadine Zeeni4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Salvia libanotica (S. Libanotica) is a commonly used herb in folk medicine in Lebanon and the Middle East. The present study aimed to assess the scientific basis for the therapeutic use of S. libanotica in glycemia and to evaluate its effects on lipemia and abdominal fat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26497894 PMCID: PMC4619217 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0917-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Nutrient composition of the high fat diet compared to standard high carbohydrate (HC) diet
| Standard HCa | High Fatb | |
|---|---|---|
| Protein (% wt) | 19 | 18.1 |
| Carbohydrates (% wt) | 65.3 | 62.2 |
| Sugars | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Fat (% wt) | 9.6 | 13.9 |
| Fat breakdown | ||
| Saturated fat | 18 % | 21 % |
| Mono-unsaturated fat | 29 % | 28 % |
| Poly-unsaturated fat | 47 % | 45 % |
| Fiber (% wt) | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| Metabolizable energy (kJ/g) | 17.7 | 18.7 |
| Energy (Protein) | 18 % | 16 % |
| Energy (Carbohydrate) | 62 % | 56 % |
| Energy (Fat) | 20 % | 28 % |
aLaboratory rodent starter diet no. 1, Hawa Chicken Co. (Safra, Lebanon)
bDiet derived from the standard HC diet enriched with coconut oil
Body weight gain and abdominal fat after 6 weeks of S. libanotica intake
| Control | GI | GII | GIII | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight gain (g) | 96.71 ± 5.31 | 76.33 ± 10.03 | 82.00 ± 5.84 | 71.20 ± 14.63 |
| Abdominal fat (g) | 2.96 ± 0.34 | 2.91 ± 0.37 | 2.61 ± 0.51 | 2.53 ± 0.41 |
| Abdominal fat (% body weight) | 0.78 ± 0.08 | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 0.74 ± 0.14 | 0.57 ± 0.06* |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 10). *corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 vs. control using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test
Fig. 1Fasting serum glucose and insulin, and liver glycogen content. Fasting serum glucose (a), insulin (b) and liver glycogen (c) after 6 weeks of S. libanotica intake. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 10). *corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 vs. control using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test
Fig. 2Glucose tolerance test. Serum glucose, 45 min after intraperitoneal injection of glucose solution (ipGTT) on days 17 (clear bars) and 36 (dashed bars) of the experiment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 10). *corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 vs. control using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test
Fasting serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol (LDL), HDL-cholesterol (HDL) and HDL/LDL ratio after 6 weeks of S. libanotica intake
| Control | GI | GII | GIII | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 37.9 ± 1.7 | 39.8 ± 2.1 | 35.4 ± 4.8 | 38.3 ± 4.2 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 49.8 ± 2.8 | 50.2 ± 3.3 | 51.4 ± 4.8 | 54.5 ± 3.1 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 15.6 ± 2.3 | 15.1 ± 3.0 | 11.2 ± 3.3 | 11.4 ± 3.2 |
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 27.2 ± 1.9 | 27.4 ± 2.5 | 31.2 ± 2.6 | 34.4 ± 2.4* |
| HDL/LDL ratio | 1.74 ± 0.18 | 1.81 ± 0.25 | 2.79 ± 0.32* | 3.02 ± 0.31* |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 10). *corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 vs. control using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test
Liver enzymes (AST, ALT and LDH) activities after 6 weeks of S. libanotica intake
| Control | GI | GII | GIII | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST | 41.5 ± 1.84 | 37.4 ± 2.93 | 39.9 ± 3.23 | 35.10 ± 2.47 |
| ALT | 23.1 ± 1.60 | 21.8 ± 1.41 | 18.0 ± 1.34 | 20.4 ± 1.51 |
| LDH | 382 ± 15.5 | 360 ± 23.6 | 241 ± 27.3* | 220 ± 25.3* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 10)
Data are presented as mean ± SEM, (n = 10). *corrected p-value ≤ 0.05 vs. control using ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test