BACKGROUND: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ42) peptide is an important biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Variability in measured Aβ42 concentrations at different laboratories may be overcome by standardization and establishing traceability to a reference system. Candidate certified reference materials (CRMs) are validated herein for this purpose. METHODS: Commutability of 16 candidate CRM formats was assessed across five CSF Aβ42 immunoassays and one mass spectrometry (MS) method in a set of 48 individual clinical CSF samples. Promising candidate CRM formats (neat CSF and CSF spiked with Aβ42) were identified and subjected to validation across eight (Elecsys, EUROIMMUN, IBL, INNO-BIA AlzBio3, INNOTEST, MSD, Simoa, and Saladax) immunoassays and the MS method in 32 individual CSF samples. Commutability was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression and the candidate CRM termed commutable when found within the prediction interval (PI). The relative distance to the regression line was assessed. RESULTS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for almost all method comparisons, except for the Simoa/MSD, Simoa/MS and MS/IBL where it was found just outside the 95% PI. However, the neat CSF was found within 5% relative distance to the regression line for MS/IBL, between 5% and 10% for Simoa/MS and between 10% and 15% for Simoa/MSD comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for 33 of 36 method comparisons, only one comparison more than expected given the 95% PI acceptance limit. We conclude that the neat CSF candidate CRM can be used for value assignment of the kit calibrators for the different Aβ42 methods.
BACKGROUND: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ42) peptide is an important biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Variability in measured Aβ42 concentrations at different laboratories may be overcome by standardization and establishing traceability to a reference system. Candidate certified reference materials (CRMs) are validated herein for this purpose. METHODS: Commutability of 16 candidate CRM formats was assessed across five CSF Aβ42 immunoassays and one mass spectrometry (MS) method in a set of 48 individual clinical CSF samples. Promising candidate CRM formats (neat CSF and CSF spiked with Aβ42) were identified and subjected to validation across eight (Elecsys, EUROIMMUN, IBL, INNO-BIA AlzBio3, INNOTEST, MSD, Simoa, and Saladax) immunoassays and the MS method in 32 individual CSF samples. Commutability was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression and the candidate CRM termed commutable when found within the prediction interval (PI). The relative distance to the regression line was assessed. RESULTS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for almost all method comparisons, except for the Simoa/MSD, Simoa/MS and MS/IBL where it was found just outside the 95% PI. However, the neat CSF was found within 5% relative distance to the regression line for MS/IBL, between 5% and 10% for Simoa/MS and between 10% and 15% for Simoa/MSD comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: The neat CSF candidate CRM format was commutable for 33 of 36 method comparisons, only one comparison more than expected given the 95% PI acceptance limit. We conclude that the neat CSF candidate CRM can be used for value assignment of the kit calibrators for the different Aβ42 methods.
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Piotr Lewczuk; Peter Riederer; Sid E O'Bryant; Marcel M Verbeek; Bruno Dubois; Pieter Jelle Visser; Kurt A Jellinger; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Alfredo Ramirez; Lucilla Parnetti; Clifford R Jack; Charlotte E Teunissen; Harald Hampel; Alberto Lleó; Frank Jessen; Lidia Glodzik; Mony J de Leon; Anne M Fagan; José Luis Molinuevo; Willemijn J Jansen; Bengt Winblad; Leslie M Shaw; Ulf Andreasson; Markus Otto; Brit Mollenhauer; Jens Wiltfang; Martin R Turner; Inga Zerr; Ron Handels; Alexander G Thompson; Gunilla Johansson; Natalia Ermann; John Q Trojanowski; Ilker Karaca; Holger Wagner; Patrick Oeckl; Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn; Maria Bjerke; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; H Bea Kuiperij; Lucia Farotti; Yi Li; Brian A Gordon; Stéphane Epelbaum; Stephanie J B Vos; Catharina J M Klijn; William E Van Nostrand; Carolina Minguillon; Matthias Schmitz; Carla Gallo; Andrea Lopez Mato; Florence Thibaut; Simone Lista; Daniel Alcolea; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Johannes Kornhuber Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Magdalena Korecka; Michal J Figurski; Susan M Landau; Magdalena Brylska; Jacob Alexander; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; William J Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Ann De Vos; Hanne Struyfs; Dirk Jacobs; Erik Fransen; Tom Klewansky; Ellen De Roeck; Caroline Robberecht; Christine Van Broeckhoven; Charles Duyckaerts; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Eugeen Vanmechelen Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Antoine Leuzy; Konstantinos Chiotis; Steen G Hasselbalch; Juha O Rinne; Alexandre de Mendonça; Markus Otto; Alberto Lleó; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Isabel Santana; Jarkko Johansson; Sarah Anderl-Straub; Christine A F von Arnim; Ambros Beer; Rafael Blesa; Juan Fortea; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Erik Portelius; Josef Pannee; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Agneta Nordberg Journal: Brain Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Hugo Marcel Johan Vanderstichele; Shorena Janelidze; Leentje Demeyer; Els Coart; Erik Stoops; Victor Herbst; Kimberley Mauroo; Britta Brix; Oskar Hansson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Stephen P Arnerić; Richard Batrla-Utermann; Laurel Beckett; Tobias Bittner; Kaj Blennow; Leslie Carter; Robert Dean; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Just Genius; Mark Forrest Gordon; Janice Hitchcock; June Kaplow; Johan Luthman; Richard Meibach; David Raunig; Klaus Romero; Mahesh N Samtani; Mary Savage; Leslie Shaw; Diane Stephenson; Robert M Umek; Hugo Vanderstichele; Brian Willis; Susan Yule Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472