| Literature DB >> 26493867 |
Edwin Preciado1, Florian J R Schülein2,3, Ariana E Nguyen1, David Barroso1, Miguel Isarraraz1, Gretel von Son1, I-Hsi Lu1, Wladislaw Michailow2, Benjamin Möller2, Velveth Klee1, John Mann4, Achim Wixforth2,3,5, Ludwig Bartels1, Hubert J Krenner2,3,5.
Abstract
Lithium niobate is the archetypical ferroelectric material and the substrate of choice for numerous applications including surface acoustic wave radio frequencies devices and integrated optics. It offers a unique combination of substantial piezoelectric and birefringent properties, yet its lack of optical activity and semiconducting transport hamper application in optoelectronics. Here we fabricate and characterize a hybrid MoS2/LiNbO3 acousto-electric device via a scalable route that uses millimetre-scale direct chemical vapour deposition of MoS2 followed by lithographic definition of a field-effect transistor structure on top. The prototypical device exhibits electrical characteristics competitive with MoS2 devices on silicon. Surface acoustic waves excited on the substrate can manipulate and probe the electrical transport in the monolayer device in a contact-free manner. We realize both a sound-driven battery and an acoustic photodetector. Our findings open directions to non-invasive investigation of electrical properties of monolayer films.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26493867 PMCID: PMC4639816 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Sample.
(a) Schematic representation of our hybrid MoS2/LiNbO3 device. Four Ti/Au electrodes form the contacts of a FET fabricated on chemical vapour deposition-grown MoS2. Two opposing, non-impedance-matched IDTs are used to excite SAWs propagating across the MoS2 FET. The insets show the electrical wiring configurations for 4-point (left) and 2-point (right) measurements. The sample was excited optically using a × 50 microscope objective with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.55. (b) SAW transmission between the IDTs across the FET device shows a pronounced 40 dB maximum at the design frequency fSAW=160 MHz of the 5.4-mm long delay line. (c) PL map of the active FET region (scale bar, 100 μm). Monolayer MoS2 PL intensity (colour coded: red high intensity, black low intensity) is detected only in the channel region. Reflection from the FET contacts and alignment marks is clearly visible. (d) Comparison of single-point PL spectra obtained on SiO2 (red) and our 128°YX-cut LiNbO3 substrate (black) reveals a blueshift attributed to compression of the MoS2 film. Norm., normalized.
Figure 2FET operation of hybrid MoS2/LiNbO3 device.
(a) Output characteristics (ISD versus VSD) for different gate voltages VGS recorded in 4-point configuration. For large negative VGS, the device is weakly conducting; an n-type channel is formed for positive VGS. (b) Transfer characteristics (ISD versus VGS) for different source-drain voltages VSD recorded in 2-point configuration shows pronounced increase of |ISD| at positive VGS due to formation of an n-type channel. (c) Channel resistance (red) and conductance (blue) as a function of VGS extracted from 2-point output characteristics at VSD=0. For positive VGS, a linear fit indicates a mobility μFE=33±5 cm2 V s−1 and a threshold voltage Vth=5.5±1.5 V. The latter agrees well with that derived from the data in b, as summarized in Table 1.
Field-effect mobility and threshold voltage of our FET device determined by different techniques.
| 33±5 | 43±5 | 37±5 | |
| 5.5±1.5 | 5.2±1.5 | 5.8±2.5 |
FET, Field-effect transistor.
Figure 3Acousto-electric spectroscopy.
(a) Frequency band of the SAW transmission between IDTs plotted as the scattering parameter S21. (b) AEC as a function of RF applied to the IDTs for different RF power levels PRF. Current measurements were performed in a 2-point short-circuit (VSD=0) configuration. The forward and reverse propagating SAWs were excited by either of the two opposing IDTs. They yield AECs of opposite sign. (c) AEV as a function of PRF measured in 4-point, open-circuit configuration (ISD=0). For both SAW propagation directions, the expected linear dependence is well reproduced. The signs of the AECs and voltages correspond to n-type conductivity of the film.
Figure 4Photoconductance spectroscopy.
(a) Comparison of the time-dependent photoresponse detected by the change of the transmitted SAW intensity (ΔS21) with the change of the 2-point conductance (ΔG) of the FET. Red and black traces were recorded for Plaser=1 mW excitation by a red and infrared laser, respectively. These lasers are switched on for Δt=5 s at t=6 s. Both the instantaneous and persistent features of the photoresponse are consistently resolved by both measurement techniques. For excitation with an infrared laser, no photoresponse is detected, proving that the signal detected for the red laser indeed stems from the MoS2 monolayer. (b) Comparison of ΔS21 with ISD under photoexcitation using a red laser. The laser is switched on every 1 min for Δt=5 s. Each successive minute Plaser is increased by 0.1 mW until Plaser=1 mW is reached. Subsequently, Plaser is decreased to 0 mW in steps of ΔPlaser=100 μW as shown in the lower panel. Upper and centre panel compare the SAW transmission (ΔS21, red) and photocurrent (ISD, black) for VSD=+100 mV and −100 mV, respectively. Direct correspondence between ΔS21 and ISD is confirmed: while ΔS21 reduces irrespective of voltages, the sign of ISD is determined by the polarity of VSD.