Literature DB >> 26493011

The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions.

Yuan-ming Xiao1, Zhi-heng Chen2, Qi-chang Zhou3, Zhiyuan Wang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) with that of conventional ultrasonography in the detection of breast cancer lesions.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, patients aged 18-78 years who had breast cancer, had undergone screening using ABVS and conventional ultrasonography, and provided a biopsy sample at a center in Changsha, China, between July 22, 2011, and September 20, 2014, were identified. Results of ultrasonography and ABVS were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 417 lesions were detected among 300 patients. Ultrasonography detected 326 lesions, whereas ABVS detected all 417 (P<0.001). ABVS detected all 32 malignant lesions and ultrasonography detected 31 (P=0.158). Conventional ultrasonography identified microcalcifications in only two cases, whereas ABVS reported these in eight cases (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: ABVS detects significantly more breast lesions than conventional ultrasonography does.
Copyright © 2015 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated breast volume scanning; Automation; Breast cancer; Ductal carcinoma; Retraction; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26493011     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Novel Semi-Automated Ultrasound System for the Detection of Synovitis: A Prospective Study involving 45 Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  M Witt; J Frielinghausen; R Mueller; F Mueller; F Proft; H Schulze-Koops; M Grunke; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 2.  Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications.

Authors:  Martina Zanotel; Iliana Bednarova; Viviana Londero; Anna Linda; Michele Lorenzon; Rossano Girometti; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Automatic breast ultrasound: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Luca Nicosia; Federica Ferrari; Anna Carla Bozzini; Antuono Latronico; Chiara Trentin; Lorenza Meneghetti; Filippo Pesapane; Maria Pizzamiglio; Nicola Balesetreri; Enrico Cassano
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-06-23

4.  The value of automated breast volume scanner combined with virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: A comparative study with mammography.

Authors:  Junli Wang; Hongjie Fan; Yuting Zhu; Chunyun Shen; Banghong Qiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance of Automatic Breast Volume Scanner Compared to Handheld Ultrasound on Different Breast Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shahad A Ibraheem; Rozi Mahmud; Suraini Mohamad Saini; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Aysar Sabah Keiteb; Ahmed M Dirie
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19

6.  Diagnostic value of an automated breast volume scanner compared with a hand-held ultrasound: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Juan Chen; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Songjie Shen; Qiang Sun; Zhaolian Ouyang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.