Karen Jones1, Jehad Sibai2, Rebecca Battjes1, Mohamad G Fakih3. 1. Department of Infection Prevention, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI. 3. Department of Infection Prevention, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Division of Infectious Diseases, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI. Electronic address: mohamad.fakih@stjohn.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obtaining a specimen for urine culture is a key element in evaluating for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Evaluating nurses' knowledge regarding appropriate reasons and methods to obtain urine culture specimens are the first steps to improving practice. METHODS: Nurses at 5 hospitals completed a 40-question survey regarding their knowledge, training, and practices of appropriate reasons for obtaining urine cultures. The survey included different scenarios of patients with urinary catheters and when they would expect to obtain urine cultures. A 12-point scoring system calculated responses regarding urine collection appropriateness. RESULTS: There were 394 nurses who responded to the survey. Of them, 76.1% reported receiving education on CAUTI risk reduction within the last 12 months. Although 327 (83%) of all nurses surveyed reported that they never collect urine samples by draining directly from the drainage bag, only 58.4% viewed others to be fully compliant with that standard (P < .001). Nurses who considered their knowledge to be above average to excellent had similar knowledge assessment scores (out of 12 points) for triggers to obtain urine cultures (mean score, 4.9 ± 1.72) compared with those that reported average to poor knowledge (mean score, 4.64 ± 1.78; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Important opportunities exist for nurses to optimize the decisions to obtain urine cultures and the process for obtaining them. Addressing nurses' knowledge and practice may lead to more appropriate use of urine cultures.
BACKGROUND: Obtaining a specimen for urine culture is a key element in evaluating for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Evaluating nurses' knowledge regarding appropriate reasons and methods to obtain urine culture specimens are the first steps to improving practice. METHODS: Nurses at 5 hospitals completed a 40-question survey regarding their knowledge, training, and practices of appropriate reasons for obtaining urine cultures. The survey included different scenarios of patients with urinary catheters and when they would expect to obtain urine cultures. A 12-point scoring system calculated responses regarding urine collection appropriateness. RESULTS: There were 394 nurses who responded to the survey. Of them, 76.1% reported receiving education on CAUTI risk reduction within the last 12 months. Although 327 (83%) of all nurses surveyed reported that they never collect urine samples by draining directly from the drainage bag, only 58.4% viewed others to be fully compliant with that standard (P < .001). Nurses who considered their knowledge to be above average to excellent had similar knowledge assessment scores (out of 12 points) for triggers to obtain urine cultures (mean score, 4.9 ± 1.72) compared with those that reported average to poor knowledge (mean score, 4.64 ± 1.78; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Important opportunities exist for nurses to optimize the decisions to obtain urine cultures and the process for obtaining them. Addressing nurses' knowledge and practice may lead to more appropriate use of urine cultures.
Authors: Catherine A Gao; Rupak Datta; Dana Dunne; Louise-Marie Dembry; Richard A Martinello; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Sonali D Advani Journal: Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Robert Garcia; Sue Barnes; Roy Boukidjian; Linda Kaye Goss; Maureen Spencer; Edward J Septimus; Marc-Oliver Wright; Shannon Munro; Sara M Reese; Mohamad G Fakih; Charles E Edmiston; Martin Levesque Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: Robert Redwood; Mary Jo Knobloch; Daniela C Pellegrini; Matthew J Ziegler; Michael Pulia; Nasia Safdar Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.887
Authors: Sonali D Advani; Catherine A Gao; Rupak Datta; Lawrence Sann; Cindy Smith; Michael S Leapman; Adam B Hittelman; James Sabetta; Louise-Marie Dembry; Richard A Martinello; Manisha Juthani-Mehta Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.835