Literature DB >> 26491905

Surgery for Localized Pancreatic Cancer: The Trend Is Not Improving.

Madeleine P Strohl1, Siavash Raigani, John B Ammori, Jeffrey M Hardacre, Julian A Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the trend in the use of surgery for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma for the past 2 decades using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients who received a diagnosis of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1988 and 2010 in the United States. Univariate and multivariate methods were used to determine factors associated with not receiving surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with survival.
RESULTS: Of 6742 patients with a diagnosis of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 1715 patients (25.4%) underwent surgery. There was no significant change in use of surgery over time. Patients were less likely to undergo surgery if they were older than 50 years, black, unmarried, and located outside the East and had pancreatic head or body lesions, higher tumor grades, or tumor size greater than 2 cm (P < 0.0001). Receiving surgery had the most significant impact on the hazard of disease-specific death (hazards ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.53; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to recent studies that suggest an increasing use of surgery, the present study demonstrates that there has been no change in the rate of use of surgery in patients with localized pancreatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26491905     DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  6 in total

1.  Potential impact of a volume pledge on spatial access: A population-level analysis of patients undergoing pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Andrew P Loehrer; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Yanik J Bababekov; Ginger Jin; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Lara N Traeger; Matthew M Hutter; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Can Comprehensive Imaging Analysis with Analytic Morphomics and Geriatric Assessment Predict Serious Complications in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery?

Authors:  Andrew J Benjamin; Mary M Buschmann; Andrew Schneider; Brian A Derstine; Jeffrey F Friedman; Stewart C Wang; William Dale; Kevin K Roggin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Implications of inaccurate clinical nodal staging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Matthew A Firpo; Kirsten M Johnson; Kenneth M Boucher; Courtney L Scaife; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Systematic review of the predictors of health service use in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Nadia N Khan; Tennille Lewin; Amy Hatton; Charles Pilgrim; Liane Ioannou; Luc Te Marvelde; John Zalcberg; Sue Evans
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 5.  Increasing cancer permeability by photodynamic priming: from microenvironment to mechanotransduction signaling.

Authors:  Nazareth Milagros Carigga Gutierrez; Núria Pujol-Solé; Qendresa Arifi; Jean-Luc Coll; Tristan le Clainche; Mans Broekgaarden
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 9.237

6.  Pancreatic Cancer: Feasibility and Outcome After Radiochemotherapy with High Dose External Radiotherapy for Non-resected and R1 Resected Patients.

Authors:  David C Lauffer; Peter A Kuhn; Marc Kueng; Sandrine U Thalmann; Géraldine Risse; Pierre-Alain Tercier; Bernhard Egger; Abdelkarim S Allal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.