Literature DB >> 26491134

Defining the "Three-Dimensional Sagittal Plane" in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Peter O Newton1, Takahito Fujimori2, Joshua Doan1, Fredrick G Reighard1, Tracey P Bastrom1, Amirhossein Misaghi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining accurate measurements of scoliosis from two-dimensional (2-D) radiographs can be challenging because of the three-dimensional (3-D) nature of the deformity. Previous studies have shown that the sagittal plane, in particular, is misrepresented on 2-D radiographs because of the influence of axial plane rotation. The purpose of the current study was to define a methodology for measuring the 3-D segmental sagittal alignment of the spine in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to assess the effect of axial plane rotation on differences between 3-D and 2-D measures of deformity.
METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative EOS images of 120 consecutive patients with AIS (primary thoracic curves) treated with segmental thoracic pedicle-screw instrumentation were analyzed in the "3-D sagittal plane." The technique measured 3-D kyphosis or lordosis in the specific plane of sagittal motion for each spinal motion segment. The kyphosis (+) and lordosis (-) values of the segments from T5 to T12 were summed to give the 3-D measurement of T5-T12 kyphosis. These values were compared with the standard 2-D measurements of T5-T12 kyphosis on lateral radiographs, and a correlation analysis with regard to axial plane rotation of the apex was performed.
RESULTS: The average age (and standard deviation) of the patients was 14 ± 2 years. The mean preoperative Cobb angle on the standard 2-D view was 55° ± 10° and on the 3-D view was 52° ± 9° (p ≤ 0.001). On the 3-D view, the mean preoperative T5-T12 kyphosis was 6° ± 14°, and the kyphosis significantly increased to 26° ± 6° postoperatively (p < 0.001). The T5-T12 kyphosis on the standard 2-D view measured 18° ± 13° preoperatively and 27° ± 6° postoperatively (p < 0.001). The difference between the 2-D and 3-D measurements of T5-T12 kyphosis strongly correlated with apical vertebral rotation (r = 0.85; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine 2-D measurements of thoracic kyphosis erroneously underestimate the preoperative loss of kyphosis in AIS because of errors associated with axial plane rotation, an inherent component of thoracic scoliosis.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491134     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Correction of hypokyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using sublaminar bands: a 3D multicenter study.

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde; Sébastien Pesenti; Emmanuelle Ferrero; Franck Accadbled; Jean-Luc Jouve; Jérôme Sales De Gauzy; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization.

Authors:  Mareille Post; Stephane Verdun; Pierre Roussouly; Kariman Abelin-Genevois
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis.

Authors:  Ricarda Lechner; David Putzer; Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Christian Bach; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of different strategies on three-dimensional correction of AIS: which plane will suffer?

Authors:  Tom P Schlösser; Kariman Abelin-Genevois; Jelle Homans; Saba Pasha; Moyo Kruyt; Pierre Roussouly; Suken A Shah; René M Castelein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Interrater reliability of three-dimensional reconstruction of the spine : Low-dose stereoradiography for evaluating bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H Almansour; W Pepke; J Rehm; T Bruckner; D Spira; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Sagittal balance and idiopathic scoliosis: does final sagittal alignment influence outcomes, degeneration rate or failure rate?

Authors:  Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A three-dimensional analysis of scoliosis progression in non-idiopathic scoliosis: is it similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Keith R Bachmann; Burt Yaszay; Carrie E Bartley; Tracey P Bastrom; Fredrick G Reighard; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  The effect of 3D scoliosis correction on the length of the spinal canal.

Authors:  Tom P C Schlösser; René M Castelein
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

9.  Considerations in sagittal evaluation of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Malcolm Ecker; Vincent Deeney
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-14

10.  Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformity correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of two distinct techniques.

Authors:  Jakub Sikora-Klak; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Brice Ilharreborde; Madeline Cross; Tracey P Bastrom; Keyvan Mazda; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.