Literature DB >> 26491131

Impact of Spinous Process Integrity on Ten to Twelve-Year Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study of Open-Door Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.

Masaaki Kakiuchi1, Wakaba Fukushima2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, preservation of the posterior elements appears to provide patients with long-term favorable outcomes. To confirm this assumption, we evaluated the impact of spinous process integrity, i.e., osseous continuity between the spinous process and the lamina, on short to long-term outcomes.
METHODS: As a model for the study of spinous process integrity, we retrospectively reviewed the cases of forty-eight patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty using a spinous process-splitting approach without disrupting attachment sites of the multifidus muscle. In those patients, thirty-nine of the 103 spinous processes achieved spontaneous osseous union with the laminar flap, while the others did not achieve osseous union. The association between the number of ununited spinous processes, as well as baseline characteristics, and the outcomes were analyzed by primary and fully adjusted multivariate linear regression. Outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for symptoms at two, four, and ten to twelve years.
RESULTS: The number of ununited spinous processes was significantly associated with ten to twelve-year scores for the ODI (β = 0.24, p = 0.030), low back pain NRS (β = 0.32, p = 0.030), and leg pain NRS (β = 0.50, p = 0.0012) in the fully adjusted models, but was not associated with two or four-year scores for each scale. The number of decompression levels was significantly associated with ten to twelve-year scores for low back pain and leg pain NRS in the primary models, but was not retained in the fully adjusted models.
CONCLUSIONS: Osseous continuity between the spinous processes and the lamina after posterior decompression of the lumbar spine is important for maintaining the positive surgical benefit. Deleterious effects of osseous discontinuity on the outcomes were obvious at ten to twelve years, but not at two or four years.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26491131     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Spinal Canal Decompression for Lumbar Stenosis: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Marc Moisi; Christian Fisahn; Lara Tkachenko; R Shane Tubbs; Daniel Ginat; Peter Grunert; Shiveindra Jeyamohan; Stephen Reintjes; Olaide Ajayi; Jeni Page; Rod J Oskouian; David Hanscom
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-05-27

2.  Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.

Authors:  Seung Myung Wi; Hui Jong Lee; Sam Yeol Chang; Oh Hyo Kwon; Choon-Ki Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Hyoungmin Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

3.  Expansive Suspension Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Surgical Technique and Outcomes Over 8 Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Masaaki Kakiuchi; Eiji Wada; Takeo Harada; Kazuya Ito; Wakaba Fukushima
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2018-10-10

4.  The limited area decompression, intervertebral fusion, and pedicle screw fixation for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with instability: Follow-up at least 12 months an observational study.

Authors:  Fengguang Yang; Enhui Ren; Liang Yang; Yonggang Wang; Xuchang Hu; Yong Yang; Xuewen Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  <Editors' Choice> Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kanbara; Testuya Urasaki; Hiroyuki Tomita; Kei Ando; Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kenyu Ito; Mikito Tsushima; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Masayoshi Morozumi; Satoshi Tanaka; Kyotaro Ota; Masaaki Machino; Sadayuki Ito; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.131

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.