Literature DB >> 26490489

18F-FDG PET/CT focal, but not osteolytic, lesions predict the progression of smoldering myeloma to active disease.

E Zamagni1, C Nanni2, F Gay3, A Pezzi1, F Patriarca4, M Bellò5, I Rambaldi2, P Tacchetti1, J Hillengass6, B Gamberi7, L Pantani1, V Magarotto3, A Versari8, M Offidani9, B Zannetti1, F Carobolante4, M Balma5, P Musto10, M Rensi11, K Mancuso1, A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss12, S Chauviè13, S Rocchi1, N Fard14, G Marzocchi1, G Storto15, P Ghedini2, A Palumbo3, S Fanti2, M Cavo1.   

Abstract

Identification of patient sub-groups with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) at high risk of progression to active disease (MM) is an important goal. 18F-FDG PET/CT (positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (PET/CT) using glucose labelled with the positron-emitting radionuclide (18)F) allows for assessing early skeletal involvement. Identification of osteolytic lesions by this technique has recently been incorporated into the updated International Myeloma Working Group criteria for MM diagnosis. However, no data are available regarding the impact of focal lesions (FLs) without underlying osteolysis on time to progression (TTP) to MM. We hence prospectively studied a cohort of 120 SMM patients with PET/CT. PET/CT was positive in 16% of patients (1 FL: 8, 2 FLs: 3, >3 FLs: 6, diffuse bone marrow involvement: 2). With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 38% of patients progressed to MM, in a median time of 4 years, including 21% with skeletal involvement. The risk of progression of those with positive PET/CT was 3.00 (95% confidence interval 1.58-5.69, P=0.001), with a median TTP of 1.1 versus 4.5 years for PET/CT-negative patients. The probability of progression within 2 years was 58% for positive versus 33% for negative patients. In conclusion, PET/CT positivity significantly increased the risk of progression of SMM to MM. PET/CT could become a new tool to define high-risk SMM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490489     DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  31 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Marc-André Weber; Tobias Bäuerle; Sofia Ayyaz; Christiane Heiss; Thomas Hielscher; Thomas M Moehler; Gerlinde Egerer; Kai Neben; Anthony D Ho; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Stefan Delorme; Hartmut Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Ola Landgren; María-Victoria Mateos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  The role of imaging techniques in the management of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Elena Zamagni; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Clinical course of light-chain smouldering multiple myeloma (idiopathic Bence Jones proteinuria): a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Dirk R Larson; Terry M Therneau; Angela Dispenzieri; L Joseph Melton; Joanne T Benson; Shaji Kumar; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 18.959

Review 5.  Dilemmas in treating smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Inhye E Ahn; Sham Mailankody; Neha Korde; Ola Landgren
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinical significance of CD81 expression by clonal plasma cells in high-risk smoldering and symptomatic multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  B Paiva; N-C Gutiérrez; X Chen; M-B Vídriales; M-Á Montalbán; L Rosiñol; A Oriol; J Martínez-López; M-V Mateos; L López-Corral; E Díaz-Rodríguez; J-J Pérez; E Fernández-Redondo; F de Arriba; L Palomera; E Bengoechea; M-J Terol; R de Paz; A Martin; J Hernández; A Orfao; J-J Lahuerta; J Bladé; A Pandiella; J-F San Miguel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells.

Authors:  Ernesto Pérez-Persona; María-Belén Vidriales; Gema Mateo; Ramón García-Sanz; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Alfonso García de Coca; Josefina Galende; Guillermo Martín-Nuñez; José M Alonso; Natalia de Las Heras; José M Hernández; Alejandro Martín; Consuelo López-Berges; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Christian M Zechmann; Lars Grenacher; Thomas M Moehler; Heiss Christiane; Barbara Wagner-Gund; Kai Neben; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined by the chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14), gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, and tumor load.

Authors:  Kai Neben; Anna Jauch; Thomas Hielscher; Jens Hillengass; Nicola Lehners; Anja Seckinger; Martin Granzow; Marc S Raab; Anthony D Ho; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Dirk Hose
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  36 in total

1.  Copper 64-labeled daratumumab as a PET/CT imaging tracer for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Enrico Caserta; Junie Chea; Megan Minnix; Erasmus K Poku; Domenico Viola; Steven Vonderfecht; Paul Yazaki; Desiree Crow; Jihane Khalife; James F Sanchez; Joycelynne M Palmer; Susanta Hui; Nadia Carlesso; Jonathan Keats; Young Kim; Ralf Buettner; Guido Marcucci; Steven Rosen; John Shively; David Colcher; Amrita Krishnan; Flavia Pichiorri
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  High-risk smoldering myeloma versus early detection of multiple myeloma: Current models, goals of therapy, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Chutima Kunacheewa; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Current and potential applications of positron emission tomography for multiple myeloma and plasma cell disorders.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; C Ola Landgren
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  The Changing Landscape of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: A European Perspective.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Carlos Fernández de Larrea; Xavier Leleu; Roy Heusschen; Niklas Zojer; Olivier Decaux; Efstathios Kastritis; Monique Minnema; Artur Jurczyszyn; Yves Beguin; Ralph Wäsch; Antonio Palumbo; Meletios Dimopoulos; Maria Victoria Mateos; Heinz Ludwig; Monika Engelhardt
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-02-26

5.  A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

Authors:  A Paschali; E Panagiotidis; T Triantafyllou; V Palaska; K Tsirou; E Verrou; E Υiannaki; D Markala; A Papanikolaou; A Pouli; P Konstantinidou; V Chatzipavlidou; E Terpos; E Katodritou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Evolutionary biology of high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Charlotte Pawlyn; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Edgardo Angtuaco; James E McDonald; Amy Buros; Caleb Stein; Charlotte Pawlyn; Sharmilan Thanendrarajan; Carolina Schinke; Rohan Samant; Shmuel Yaccoby; Brian A Walker; Joshua Epstein; Maurizio Zangari; Frits van Rhee; Tobias Meissner; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kari Hemminki; Richard Houlston; Bart Barlogie; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan; Niels Weinhold
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Treatment response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; J Hillengass; H Goldschmidt; B Wagner; U Haberkorn; K Kopka; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Quantification of circulating clonal plasma cells via multiparametric flow cytometry identifies patients with smoldering multiple myeloma at high risk of progression.

Authors:  W I Gonsalves; S V Rajkumar; A Dispenzieri; D Dingli; M M Timm; W G Morice; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; R S Go; N Leung; P Kapoor; S R Hayman; J A Lust; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; L Hwa; T V Kourelis; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.