Literature DB >> 26490185

Diagnostic exome sequencing for patients with a family history of consanguinity: over 38% of positive results are not autosomal recessive pattern.

Zöe Powis1, Kelly D Farwell1, Christina L Alamillo1, Sha Tang1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic exome sequencing (DES) is an effective tool for diagnosis in intractable cases where the underlying cause is thought be genetic. It is commonly assumed that patients with a family history of consanguinity will have increased detection rates for rare autosomal recessive Mendelian disorders through DES. Herein, we analyzed the diagnostic yield and relevant inheritance patterns within the DES cases with a reported consanguineous family history. Of the first 500 unselected cases referred for DES, 40 (8.0%) had a known consanguineous family history. Among the 40 cases, 13 (32.5%) received a definitive molecular diagnosis through DES and such positive rate is similar to that of families with no reported consanguinity (139/460, 30.2%, P=0.63). Although homozygous alterations likely related to consanguinity have been identified in eight positive cases, the other five (38.4%) causative mutations were unrelated to autosomal recessive inheritance. Our retrospective analysis demonstrated that individuals with known consanguinity were not more likely to have a positive DES result and a significant portion of the positive findings were not within an autosomal recessive gene. These results highlight that all applicable inheritance patterns should be considered for patients with a known family history of consanguinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490185     DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2015.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  12 in total

Review 1.  Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics.

Authors:  A Bittles
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Effect of consanguinity on birth defects in Saudi women: results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Majeed-Saidan; Amer N Ammari; Amal M AlHashem; Maha S Al Rakaf; Mohamed M Shoukri; Ester Garne; Ahmed Mohammed Kurdi
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2014-10-31

Review 3.  Impact of new genomic tools on the practice of clinical genetics in consanguineous populations: the Saudi experience.

Authors:  F S Alkuraya
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Unexpected exome sequencing result: de novo TRPS1 mutation in an infant with infantile scoliosis, mild developmental delay, and history of consanguinity.

Authors:  Ian Casci; William Accousti; Yves Lacassie
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Diagnostic exome sequencing to elucidate the genetic basis of likely recessive disorders in consanguineous families.

Authors:  Periklis Makrythanasis; Mari Nelis; Federico A Santoni; Michel Guipponi; Anne Vannier; Frédérique Béna; Stefania Gimelli; Elisavet Stathaki; Samia Temtamy; André Mégarbané; Amira Masri; Mona S Aglan; Maha S Zaki; Armand Bottani; Siv Fokstuen; Lorraine Gwanmesia; Konstantinos Aliferis; Mariana Bustamante Eduardo; Georgios Stamoulis; Stavroula Psoni; Sofia Kitsiou-Tzeli; Helen Fryssira; Emmanouil Kanavakis; Nasir Al-Allawi; Abdelaziz Sefiani; Sana' Al Hait; Siham C Elalaoui; Nadine Jalkh; Lihadh Al-Gazali; Fatma Al-Jasmi; Habiba Chaabouni Bouhamed; Ebtesam Abdalla; David N Cooper; Hanan Hamamy; Stylianos E Antonarakis
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Consanguinity and recurrence risk of birth defects: a population-based study.

Authors:  C Stoltenberg; P Magnus; A Skrondal; R T Lie
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-02-19

7.  Whole exome sequencing unravels disease-causing genes in consanguineous families in Qatar.

Authors:  S Fahiminiya; M Almuriekhi; Z Nawaz; A Staffa; P Lepage; R Ali; L Hashim; J Schwartzentruber; K Abu Khadija; S Zaineddin; H Gamal; J Majewski; T Ben-Omran
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  First steps in exploring prospective exome sequencing of consanguineous couples.

Authors:  Marieke Teeuw; Quinten Waisfisz; Petra J G Zwijnenburg; Erik A Sistermans; Marjan M Weiss; Lidewij Henneman; Leo P ten Kate; Martina C Cornel; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Enhanced utility of family-centered diagnostic exome sequencing with inheritance model-based analysis: results from 500 unselected families with undiagnosed genetic conditions.

Authors:  Kelly D Farwell; Layla Shahmirzadi; Dima El-Khechen; Zöe Powis; Elizabeth C Chao; Brigette Tippin Davis; Ruth M Baxter; Wenqi Zeng; Cameron Mroske; Melissa C Parra; Stephanie K Gandomi; Ira Lu; Xiang Li; Hong Lu; Hsiao-Mei Lu; David Salvador; David Ruble; Monica Lao; Soren Fischbach; Jennifer Wen; Shela Lee; Aaron Elliott; Charles L M Dunlop; Sha Tang
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Genetic heterogeneity and consanguinity lead to a "double hit": homozygous mutations of MYO7A and PDE6B in a patient with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen; Eyal Banin; Yael Zalzstein; Ben Cohen; Ygal Rotenstreich; Leah Rizel; Lina Basel-Vanagaite; Tamar Ben-Yosef
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A Clinician's perspective on clinical exome sequencing.

Authors:  Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; David T Miller
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Diagnosis of lethal or prenatal-onset autosomal recessive disorders by parental exome sequencing.

Authors:  Karen L Stals; Matthew Wakeling; Júlia Baptista; Richard Caswell; Andrew Parrish; Julia Rankin; Carolyn Tysoe; Garan Jones; Adam C Gunning; Hana Lango Allen; Lisa Bradley; Angela F Brady; Helena Carley; Jenny Carmichael; Bruce Castle; Deirdre Cilliers; Helen Cox; Charu Deshpande; Abhijit Dixit; Jacqueline Eason; Frances Elmslie; Andrew E Fry; Alan Fryer; Muriel Holder; Tessa Homfray; Emma Kivuva; Victoria McKay; Ruth Newbury-Ecob; Michael Parker; Ravi Savarirayan; Claire Searle; Nora Shannon; Deborah Shears; Sarah Smithson; Ellen Thomas; Peter D Turnpenny; Vinod Varghese; Pradeep Vasudevan; Emma Wakeling; Emma L Baple; Sian Ellard
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Katie Lewis; Laura M Amendola; Barbara A Bernhardt; Sawona Biswas; Manasi Joshi; Carmit McMullen; Sarah Scollon
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 4.  A retrospective review of multiple findings in diagnostic exome sequencing: half are distinct and half are overlapping diagnoses.

Authors:  Erica D Smith; Kirsten Blanco; Samin A Sajan; Jesse M Hunter; Deepali N Shinde; Bess Wayburn; Mari Rossi; Jennifer Huang; Cathy A Stevens; Candace Muss; Wendy Alcaraz; Kelly D Farwell Hagman; Sha Tang; Kelly Radtke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Rare Disease Diagnostics: A Single-center Experience and Lessons Learnt.

Authors:  Karin Weiss; Alina Kurolap; Tamar Paperna; Adi Mory; Maya Steinberg; Tova Hershkovitz; Nina Ekhilevitch; Hagit N Baris
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2018-07-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.