| Literature DB >> 26489983 |
Engin Oral1, Begum Aydogan Mathyk2, Berna Imge Aydogan3, Abdullah Serdar Acıkgoz1, Hakan Erenel2, Hasniye Celik Acıoglu4, Gökce Anık Ilhan5, Banu Dane6, Aysegul Ozel6, Bulent Tandogan7, Erbil Cakar7, Herman Isci8, Basak Kayan8, Halil Aslan9, Ali Ekiz9, Seda Sancak10, Ayhan Celik11, Tevfik Yoldemir5, Ozgur Uzun5, Murat Faik Erdogan3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the iodine status of pregnant women in a metropolitan city which was stated as iodine sufficient area after salt iodination program. This multicenter, cross-sectional study was carried out on 3543 pregnant women. Age, gestational weeks, smoking, consumption of iodized salt, dietary salt restriction, history of stillbirth, abortus and congenital malformations were questioned. Spot urine samples were analyzed for urine iodine concentration (UIC). The outcomes were: (a) median UIC in three trimesters of pregnancy and (b) frequency of ID among pregnant women. The median UIC was 73 µg/L. The median UIC was 77 µg/L (1-324), 73 µg/L (1-600) and 70 µg/L (1-1650) in three trimesters of pregnancy, respectively (p: 0.14). UIC <50 µg/L was observed in 36.6% (n: 1295) and UIC<150 µg/L was observed in 90.7% (n: 3214) of pregnant women. Only 1% (n: 34) of the pregnant women had UIC levels higher than 500 µg/L. This study showed that more than 90% of the pregnant women in this iodine-sufficient city are facing some degree of iodine deficiency during their pregnancy. A salt iodization program might be satisfactory for the non-pregnant population, but it seems to be insufficient for the pregnant population.Entities:
Keywords: Iodine deficiency; iodine status; iodine-sufficient; pregnancy; salt iodination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26489983 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1101443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Endocrinol ISSN: 0951-3590 Impact factor: 2.260