| Literature DB >> 26489724 |
Mohammad Khalid Mojadidi1, Panagiota Christia2, Jason Salamon2, Jared Liebelt2, Tarique Zaman2, Rubine Gevorgyan3, Nariman Nezami2, Sanaullah Mojaddedi4, Islam Y Elgendy4, Jonathan M Tobis3, Robert Faillace2.
Abstract
The foramen ovale is a remnant of the fetal circulation that remains patent in 20-25% of the adult population. Although long overlooked as a potential pathway that could produce pathologic conditions, the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with a higher than expected frequency in a variety of clinical syndromes including cryptogenic stroke, migraines, sleep apnea, platypnea-orthodeoxia, deep sea diving associated decompression illness, and high altitude pulmonary edema. A unifying hypothesis is that a chemical or particulate matter from the venous circulation crosses the PFO conduit between the right and left atria to produce a variety of clinical syndromes. Although observational studies suggest a therapeutic benefit of PFO closure compared to medical therapy alone in patients with cryptogenic stroke, 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not confirm the superiority of PFO closure for the secondary prevention of stroke. However, meta-analyses of these RCTs demonstrate a significant benefit of PFO closure over medical therapy alone. Similarly, observational studies provide support for PFO closure for symptomatic relief of migraines. But one controversial randomized study failed to replicate the results of the observational studies while another two demonstrated a partial benefit. The goal of this review is to discuss the clinical conditions associated with PFO and provide internists and primary care physicians with current data on PFO trials, and clinical insight to help guide their patients who are found to have a PFO on echocardiographic testing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26489724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.09.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Intern Med ISSN: 0953-6205 Impact factor: 4.487