Literature DB >> 26489709

Association of endoscopic ultrasonographic parameters and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): can endoscopic ultrasonography be used to screen gastric GISTs for potential malignancy?

Tsung-Hsing Chen1,2, Chen-Ming Hsu1, Yin-Yi Chu1, Chi-Huan Wu1, Tse-Ching Chen3, Jun-Te Hsu4, Ta-Sen Yeh4, Chun-Jung Lin1, Cheng-Tang Chiu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research shows that only 10-30% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are malignant. Nonetheless, some reports suggest that all of them have some degree of potential for malignancy. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a useful technique for differentiation of subepithelial lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. We explored EUS characteristics that might predict the malignancy potential of GISTs.
METHODS: In this retrospective review of the medical records from 1999 through 2007, patients who had gastric stromal tumors diagnosed prior to surgery using EUS were enrolled. The EUS images, procedure records and tissue histopathology were reviewed. All patients were positive for C-kit.
RESULTS: Of the 110 patients enrolled, 57 were males, and 53 were females. Most (67%) of the GISTs were located in the gastric body. The lesion size ranged from 6.3 to 150 mm (mean ± SD: 39.73 ± 22.49 mm). The high-risk GIST group had 19 (17.3%) patients, the intermediate-risk group had 12 (10.9%) patients and the low/very low-risk group had 79 (71.8%) patients. Thirty patients had cystic lesions (27.3%), while six patients had calcification in the lesion (5.5%). Additionally, 27 patients (24.5%) had surface ulceration visible on endoscopy. GISTs at high risk for malignancy were highly associated with lesion size (p < 0.0001), cystic change (p = 0.015) and surface ulceration (p = 0.036) but not with calcification (p = 0.667). We also found that mitosis was associated with lesion size (p < 0.0001) rather than other parameters. Age was not predictive of malignancy potential (p = 0.316). However, tumor size is the only one independent risk factor for malignancy (p ≤ 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results show that large gastric GISTs with cystic change and surface ulceration may associate with a risk of malignancy, warranting more aggressive management. Nevertheless, the tumor size is more important than other factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasonography; gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26489709     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1095350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided single-incision needle knife biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: comparison with resected specimens.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Byung-Wook Kim; Gi Jun Kim; Young Wook Kim; Seung Ji Ryu; Sung Min Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Sun Young Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Lili Xu; Xiaoyu Dong; Yue Li; Jiang Yu; Wei Xiong; Guoxin Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Malignant Potential of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Gulseren Seven; Gokhan Silahtaroglu; Koray Kochan; Ali Tuzun Ince; Dilek Sema Arici; Hakan Senturk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Yanchao Zhao; Linxue Qian; Peng Li; Shutian Zhang
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

5.  A Case of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor That Underwent Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Aspiration with a 25-Gauge Biopsy Needle.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-09

6.  Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Christian Jenssen; Michael Hocke; Yi Dong; Wen-Ping Wang; Xin-Wu Cui; Matthias Woenckhaus; Sevastita Iordache; Adrian Saftoiu; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Subepithelial rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor - the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration to establish a definitive cytological diagnosis: a case report.

Authors:  Vitor Ottoboni Brunaldi; Martin Coronel; Danielle Azevedo Chacon; Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura; Sérgio E Matuguma; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux De Moura; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De Moura
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-03-05

8.  Heavily calcified gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathophysiology and implications of a rare clinicopathologic entity.

Authors:  Massimiliano Salati; Giulia Orsi; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Giuseppe Longo; Stefano Cascinu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 9.  How best to manage gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Gandhi Lanke; Jeffrey H Lee
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-10

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection in treatment of small gastric stromal tumors: A state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ze-Ming Chen; Min-Si Peng; Li-Sheng Wang; Zheng-Lei Xu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.