Literature DB >> 26488875

Cholangiocarcinoma in Cirrhosis: Value of Hepatocyte Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Fabio Piscaglia1, Massimo Iavarone, Marzia Galassi, Sara Vavassori, Matteo Renzulli, Laura Virginia Forzenigo, Alessandro Granito, Veronica Salvatore, Angelo Sangiovanni, Rita Golfieri, Massimo Colombo, Luigi Bolondi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC) remains elusive at imaging, which is a critical issue in cirrhotic patients in whom a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be established only by imaging. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of MRI in the diagnosis of ICC in cirrhosis using 'hepatocyte-specific' Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents.
METHODS: Sixteen histologically proven and retrospectively identified ICCs on cirrhosis were investigated with hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance contrast agents (6 in Bologna with Gd-EOB-DTPA and 10 in Milan with Gd-BOPTA). The control group consisted of 41 consecutively and prospectively collected nodules (31 HCCs) imaged with Gd-EOB-DTPA.
RESULTS: Fifteen ICC nodules (94%) displayed hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase, suggesting malignancy. Thirteen cholangiocarcinomas (81%) showed hyperenhancement in the venous phase. Only 2 cholangiocarcinoma nodules showed hypoenhancement in the venous phase, corresponding to washout, in both cases preceded by rim enhancement in arterial phase. All the hepatocarcinomas showed hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase, but was always preceded by hypointensity in the venous phase; arterial rim enhancement was never observed in any hepatocarcinoma or regenerative nodule.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI with hepatocyte-specific Gd-based contrast agents showed a pattern of malignancy in almost all the ICCs, concurrently avoiding misdiagnosis with hepatocarcinoma. These findings suggest a greater diagnostic capacity for this technique compared with the results of MRI with conventional contrast agents reported in the literature in this setting.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26488875     DOI: 10.1159/000439097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  5 in total

1.  Hepatobiliary phase in cirrhotic patients with different Model for End-stage Liver Disease score: comparison of the performance of gadoxetic acid to gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Claudia Khouri Chalouhi; Federica Vernuccio; Francesca Rini; Piergiorgio Duca; Bruno Tuscano; Giuseppe Brancatelli; Angelo Vanzulli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Jinpeng Du; Jiwei Huang; Yong Zeng; Kefei Yuan
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-04

3.  Hereditary breast cancer: screening and risk reducing surgery.

Authors:  Matteo Renzulli; Simone Zanotti; Alfredo Clemente; Giangaspare Mineo; Francesco Tovoli; Alfonso Reginelli; Antonio Barile; Salvatore Cappabianca; Mario Taffurelli; Rita Golfieri
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-09

4.  Man or machine? Prospective comparison of the version 2018 EASL, LI-RADS criteria and a radiomics model to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hanyu Jiang; Xijiao Liu; Jie Chen; Yi Wei; Jeong Min Lee; Likun Cao; Yuanan Wu; Ting Duan; Xin Li; Ling Ma; Bin Song
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Prognosis of Single Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) with CEUS Inconclusive Imaging (LI-RADS LR-3 and LR-4) Is No Better than Typical HCC (LR-5).

Authors:  Eleonora Terzi; Alice Giamperoli; Massimo Iavarone; Simona Leoni; Ludovico De Bonis; Alessandro Granito; Antonella Forgione; Francesco Tovoli; Fabio Piscaglia
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.