Literature DB >> 26488610

Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion.

Sophie Béranger-Gibert1, Hajer Sakly1, Marcos Ballester1, Andrea Rockall1, Marie Bornes1, Marc Bazot1, Emile Daraï1, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in a series of patients with an equivocal adnexal mass at ultrasonography (US) in the context of acute or subacute pelvic pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics committee approved the study and waived informed consent. All patients with acute or subacute pelvic pain who were undergoing MR examination for the exploration of an equivocal adnexal mass (January 2007 to December 2012) with surgical exploration or clinical and radiologic follow-up of at least 3 months were retrospectively included (n = 58). The prospective interpretations were recorded. Additionally, three radiologists who were blinded to the clinical, US, and surgical data retrospectively and independently reviewed MR images. Features associated with adnexal torsion were identified by using univariate and recursive partitioning multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (38%) had a diagnosis of adnexal torsion. The accuracy of MR imaging at the time of prospective interpretation was 80.6% (25 of 31 patients) and 85.1% (23 of 27 patients) in acute and subacute torsion, respectively. The accuracy of image interpretation by each retrospective reader was 83.9% (26 of 31 patients), 90.3% (28 of 31 patients), and 83.9% (26 of 31 patients) in the context of acute pelvic pain and 92.6% (25 of 27 patients), 88.9% (24 of 27 patients), and 81.5% (22 of 27 patients) in the context of subacute pelvic pain for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the whirlpool sign (odds ratio = 6.5 [95% confidence interval: 1.36, 31.0], P = .01) and a thickened tube (>10 mm) (odds ratio = 8.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.2, 56.8], P = .03) were associated with adnexal torsion, with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.71-0.84 and 0.82-0.86, respectively). The presence of adnexal hemorrhagic content was associated with nonviable ovaries in seven of 10 patients (70%) and with viable ovaries in 12 of 45 patients (27%) (P = .009).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging is an accurate technique for the diagnosis of adnexal torsion in patients who have an adnexal mass with acute or subacute pelvic pain. (©) RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26488610     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Predicting necrosis in adnexal torsion in women of reproductive age using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Na Duan; Min Rao; Xiao Chen; Yanyun Yin; Zhongqiu Wang; Rong Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Preoperative CT image-based assessment for estimating risk of ovarian torsion in women with ovarian lesions and pelvic pain.

Authors:  Jeong Ah Hwang; Hyeong Cheol Shin; Seung Soo Kim; Nam Hun Heo; Seo-Youn Choi; Ji Eun Lee; Sunyoung Lee
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-15

Review 3.  What every radiologist should know about adnexal torsion.

Authors:  Guillaume Ssi-Yan-Kai; Anne-Laure Rivain; Caroline Trichot; Marie-Chantal Morcelet; Sophie Prevot; Xavier Deffieux; Jocelyne De Laveaucoupet
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-07

4.  Usefulness of T2*-weighted MRI in the detection of adnexal torsion.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kawai; Hiroki Kato; Masayuki Kanematsu; Shimpei Kawaguchi; Toshihisa Kojima; Tatsuro Furui; Ken-Ichirou Morishige; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-06-23

5.  Laparoscopic Adnexal Detorsion in a 20-Week Pregnant Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Rawad Halimeh; Serge Tomassian; Maria El Hage; Nicole Metri; Marianne Bersaoui; Rafi Daou; Elie Anastasiadis
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-11-11

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging performance for diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pregnant women with stimulated ovaries.

Authors:  Elizabeth Asch; Jesse Wei; Koenraad J Mortele; Kathryn Humm; Kim Thornton; Deborah Levine
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2017-09-06

7.  Adnexal torsion in the third trimester of pregnancy: a case report and diagnostic value of MR imaging.

Authors:  Wei Bai; Xiao Xu; Haizhu Xie; Chunjuan Sun; Kaili Che; Meijie Liu; Jing Liu; Yinghong Shi; Heng Ma
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.