Literature DB >> 32935259

Preoperative CT image-based assessment for estimating risk of ovarian torsion in women with ovarian lesions and pelvic pain.

Jeong Ah Hwang1,2, Hyeong Cheol Shin3, Seung Soo Kim3, Nam Hun Heo4, Seo-Youn Choi5, Ji Eun Lee5, Sunyoung Lee6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To define and weight the preoperative CT findings for ovarian torsion and to develop an integrated nomogram for estimating the probability of ovarian torsion in women with ovarian lesion and pelvic pain.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 218 women with surgically resected ovarian lesions who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT for pelvic pain from January 2014 to February 2019. Significant imaging findings for torsion were extracted using regression analyses and a regression coefficient-based nomogram was constructed. The diagnostic performance with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the significant imaging findings and the nomogram were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 255 ovarian lesions (123 lesions with torsion and 132 lesions without torsion) were evaluated. Multivariable regression analysis showed that whirl sign (odds ratio [OR] 11.000; p < 0.001), tubal thickening (OR 4.621; p = 0.001), unusual location of ovarian lesion (OR 2.712; p = 0.020), and hemorrhagic component within adnexal lesion (OR 2.537; p = 0.028) were independent significant parameters predicting ovarian torsion. Tubal thickening showed the highest sensitivity (91.1%) and whirl sign showed the highest specificity (94.7%). When probabilities of ovarian torsion of 0.5 or more in the nomogram were diagnosed as ovarian torsion, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the nomogram were 78.1%, 91.7%, and 85.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The whirl sign, tubal thickening, unusual location of ovarian lesion, and hemorrhagic component within adnexal lesion, and an integrated nomogram derived from these significant findings can be useful for predicting ovarian torsion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nomograms; Ovarian cysts; Ovarian neoplasms; Tomography; Torsion abnormality; X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32935259     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02761-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  16 in total

1.  Ovarian and adnexal torsion: spectrum of sonographic findings with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  F Albayram; U M Hamper
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Ovarian torsion: diagnostic features on CT and MRI with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Shauna Duigenan; Esther Oliva; Susanna I Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors.

Authors:  Reuven Mashiach; Nir Melamed; Noa Gilad; Gadi Ben-Shitrit; Israel Meizner
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Multimodality imaging in adnexal torsion.

Authors:  Aruna R Patil; Shrivalli Nandikoor; Anuradha Rao; Govindarajan M Janardan; AmithaVikrama Kheda; Mahesh Hari; Sharana Basappa
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 1.735

5.  Adnexal torsion: a mind-twisting diagnosis.

Authors:  T Haskins; B L Shull
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Torsion of the ovary: sonographic features.

Authors:  M Graif; J Shalev; S Strauss; S Engelberg; S Mashiach; Y Itzchak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Acute ovarian torsion in children.

Authors:  E R Kokoska; M S Keller; T R Weber
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography: depiction of twisted vascular pedicle.

Authors:  E J Lee; H C Kwon; H J Joo; J H Suh; A C Fleischer
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Value of intra-adnexal and extra-adnexal computed tomographic imaging features diagnosing torsion of adnexal tumor.

Authors:  Jong Hwa Lee; Seong Bin Park; Sang Hoon Shin; Jong Chang Jang; Won Chan Lee; Ae Kyoung Jeong; Myeon Jun Yang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion.

Authors:  Hannah C Chang; Shweta Bhatt; Vikram S Dogra
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.