Literature DB >> 26487171

The Impact of Improved Population Life Expectancy in Survival Trend Analyses of Specific Diseases.

Carl van Walraven1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival trend analyses examine mortality outcomes over time. The impact of conducting survival trend analyses without accounting for improved population survival has not been systematically studied.
METHODS: The 1-year risk of death in the 100 most common hospital admissions for Ontario adults in 1994, 1999, 2004, and 2009 was determined. Generalized linear models were used to determine if adjusted death risk changed significantly over time with and without accounting for population survival.
RESULTS: The statistical significance of temporal trends in survival changed after accounting for population life expectancy in 16 diagnoses (16 percent) (in 13 of 55 diagnoses, statistically significant decreasing mortality trends became insignificant; in 3 of 15 diagnoses, insignificant trends changed to a significant increase in mortality risk over time).
CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the importance of accounting for population life-expectancy changes in survival trend analyses. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Relative survival; generalized linear model; survival trend analyses

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26487171      PMCID: PMC4946043          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

1.  Relative excess risk: an alternative measure of comparative risk.

Authors:  S Suissa
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.

Authors:  F EDERER; L M AXTELL; S J CUTLER
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1961-09

3.  Improvement in colorectal cancer survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mitry; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Jacques Esteve; Jean Faivre
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Relative survival: what can cardiovascular disease learn from cancer?

Authors:  Christopher P Nelson; Paul C Lambert; Iain B Squire; David R Jones
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Five-year relative survival of patients with osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; You-Jin Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  "Significant-itis"--an obsession with the P-value.

Authors:  K S Chia
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Joshua A Salomon; Haidong Wang; Michael K Freeman; Theo Vos; Abraham D Flaxman; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The mortality risk score and the ADG score: two points-based scoring systems for the Johns Hopkins aggregated diagnosis groups to predict mortality in a general adult population cohort in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Vive la différence (P less than 0.05)

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries.

Authors:  S Tuljapurkar; N Li; C Boe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  RAE1 is a prognostic biomarker and is correlated with clinicopathological characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Gang Chi; Jin-Hong Pei; Xue-Qing Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.307

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.