| Literature DB >> 26483919 |
Marisa Pedemonte1, Martín Testa1, Marcela Díaz1, Diego Suárez-Bagnasco2.
Abstract
Based on the knowledge that sensory processing continues during sleep and that a relationship exists between sleep and learning, a new strategy for treatment of idiopathic subjective tinnitus, consisted of customized sound stimulation presented during sleep, was tested. It has been previously shown that this treatment induces a sustained decrease in tinnitus intensity; however, its effect on brain activity has not yet been studied. In this work, we compared the impact of sound stimulation in tinnitus patients in the different sleep stages. Ten patients with idiopathic tinnitus were treated with sound stimulation mimicking tinnitus during sleep. Power spectra and intra- and inter-hemispheric coherence of electroencephalographic waves from frontal and temporal electrodes were measured with and without sound stimulation for each sleep stage (stages N2 with sleep spindles; N3 with slow wave sleep and REM sleep with Rapid Eye Movements). The main results found were that the largest number of changes, considering both the power spectrum and wave׳s coherence, occurred in stages N2 and N3. The delta and theta bands were the most changed, with important changes also in coherence of spindles during N2. All changes were more frequent in temporal areas. The differences between the two hemispheres do not depend, at least exclusively, on the side where the tinnitus is perceived and, hence, of the stimulated side. These results demonstrate that sound stimulation during sleep in tinnitus patients׳ influences brain activity and open an avenue for investigating the mechanism underlying tinnitus and its treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Coherence; Electroencephalography; Power spectra; Sleep; Sound stimulation; Tinnitus
Year: 2014 PMID: 26483919 PMCID: PMC4559594 DOI: 10.1016/j.slsci.2014.09.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep Sci ISSN: 1984-0063
Power spectra changes during sound stimulation in each sleep stage.
| WF, m | 4 | 40 dB SPL | Theta F3↑ | Theta F4↑ T3↑ | ||
| 42 y.o. | 4,9 + 9,8 kHz | |||||
| MB, f | 9 | 60 dB SPL | ||||
| 64 y.o. | 4,6 + 4,5 + 4,4 + 4,3 kHz | Delta F4 ↓ T3↓ | Theta T3↓ | |||
| GB, f | 10 | 59 dB SPL | Interh delta T | |||
| 39 y.o. | 7,3 + BN 7,3 kHz | Theta T3↑ | Interh theta T | Delta F4↑ T3↑ | ||
| TL, f | 12 | 40 dB SPL | Theta F3↑ F4↑ T3↑ | Interh alpha T | ||
| 32 y.o. | 3, 6 + 6,6 kHz | Theta F4↑ | Alpha T3↑ | |||
| SO, f | 15 | 59 dB SPL | Delta T3↓ | |||
| 60 y.o. | 11,44+10,44+9,40+9,20 kHz | Theta F4↓ | ||||
| FC, m | 19 | 68 dB SPL | ||||
| 58 y.o. | 8,0 + BN 10,7 kHz | Theta F3↑ | ||||
| MA, m | 21 | 59 dB SPL | ||||
| 21 y.o. | * | 7,5 + 15,1 kHz | Interh theta T | |||
| EC, f | 21 | 62 dB SPL | Delta F4↑ | |||
| 32 y.o. | BN 3,5 kHz | Alpha T4↓ | Theta T4↑ | |||
| Interh delta F | ||||||
| EP, m | 22 | 53 dB SPL | ||||
| 32 y.o. | * | 6,6 + 6,8 kHz | Alpha T4↓ | |||
| LG, f | 30 | 60 dB SPL | Delta T4↑ | |||
| 55 y.o. | 6,1 + 6,2 + 6,5 kHz | Theta T4↑ | Delta T4↑ | |||
| Alpha F3↑ T4↑ | ||||||
Table 1 Shows statistically significant power spectra changes in each sleep stage, comparing delta, theta and alpha bands power spectra during silent and sound stimulation. Different sleep stages were analyzed separately (Stage N2; stage N3 and REM, rapid eye movements). From left to right: patient identification; m, male; f, female, age (y.o.); dB↓, tinnitus intensity decrement at the end of the treatment (★patients in whom the perception of tinnitus disappeared); Tinnitus intensity and “Match noise”, tinnitus intensity before treatment (15 days average in dB SPL); “Match noise”, characteristics of the created sound for stimulation, “BN”, Band Noise; “R” and “L”, right and left stimulation side; “F” and “T”, frontal and temporal electrodes; “3” and “4”, left and right positions, respectively; “Interh” is the comparison between left and right brain hemisphere; ↑ and ↓, power spectra increments and decrements during sound stimulation. Only statistical significant changes are shown. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post test to compare all pairs of columns.
Fig. 1Polisomnographic recording of patient L.G. She was recorded nocturnal physiological sleep for almost six hours. From top to bottom, hypnogram showing sequences of the different sleep stage through the night: Wakefulness (W), Rapid Eyes Movement Sleep (REM), stages N1, N2, N3. Sound stimulation was applied in the first half of the night (arrows).The 3 boxes below show 3 sec of different sleep stages: 10 electroencephalographic recordings, 2 electro-oculograms (EOG), electrocardiogram (EKG), respiratory movements (Resp) and legs movements (EMG1 and EMG2).
Fig. 2Power spectra of patient T.L. binaurally stimulated. Power spectra of delta, theta and alpha electroencephalographic bands were studied in frontal (F) and temporal (T) electrodes (3 is the left side, 4 is the right side), in each sleep stage (N2, N3 and REM). Ten temporal windows during sound stimulation (St) were compared with other 10 in silence as a Control (C) in each situation. Bars show means±Standard Deviation. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test to compare all pairs of columns, *p<0,05.
Coherence changes during sound stimulation in each sleep stage.
| Delta, theta, alpha, spindles | Overall coherence | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WF, m | ||||||
| 42 y.o. | Spindles F3T3 ↓ | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F3T3 ↑ | |||
| MB, f | Theta F4T4 ↑ | Theta F3T3 ↓ | Delta F3F4 ↓ | T3T4 ↓ | T3T4 ↓ | |
| 64 y.o. | Spindles F3T3 ↓ | Alpha F3T3 ↓ | ||||
| Spindles T3T4 ↓ | ||||||
| GB, f | Delta F3T3 ↑ | |||||
| 39 y.o. | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F3T3 ↓ | Delta F4T4 ↑ | F3T3 ↓ | ||
| Theta F3T3 ↓ | Theta F3T3 ↑ | |||||
| Alpha F3T3 ↓ | Theta F4T4 ↑ | |||||
| Alpha F4T4 ↑ | ||||||
| TL, f | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | F4T4 ↓ | |||
| 32 y.o. | Spindles F3T3 ↓ | Theta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | ||||
| Spindles F4T4 ↓ | Theta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | |||||
| Delta F3T3 ↓ | ||||||
| SO, f | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F4T4 ↓ | Theta F3T3 ↓ | F3T3 ↓ | T3T4 ↓ | |
| 60 y.o. | Theta F4T4 ↑ | Theta F3T3 ↓ | ||||
| Alpha F3T3 ↓ | Theta F4T4 ↓ | |||||
| Delta T3T4 ↓ | Delta T3T4 ↓ | |||||
| Alpha F3F4 ↑ | Theta T3T4 ↓ | |||||
| AlphaT3T4 ↓ | ||||||
| FC, m | Theta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F3T3 ↓ | Delta F4T4 ↑ | F3T3 ↑ | ||
| 58 y.o. | Alpha F3T3 ↑ | Theta F3T3 ↓ | Theta F3T3 ↑ | |||
| Spindles F3F4 ↑ | Alpha F4T4 ↑ | |||||
| Delta F4T4 ↑ | ||||||
| MA, m | Theta F4T4 ↑ | Delta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Alpha F3T3 ↓ | F4T4 ↑ | F3T3 ↓ | |
| 21 y.o. | Theta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Alpha F3T3 ↓ | Delta T3T4 ↓ | T3T4 ↓ | ||
| Delta T3T4 ↓ | Delta F3F4 ↑ | Delta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | ||||
| Delta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | Delta T3T4 ↑ | |||||
| Alpha F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | ||||||
| Spindles F3T3 ↓ | ||||||
| EC, f | Theta F3T3 ↓ | |||||
| 32 y.o. | Theta F4T4 ↓ | F4T4 ↓ | ||||
| Spindles T3T4 ↓ | F3T3 ↓ | |||||
| Spindles F4T4 ↓ | ||||||
| EP, m | Delta F3T3 ↓ | |||||
| 32 y.o. | Alpha F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Theta F3T3 ≠ F4T4 | Delta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | T3T4 ↓ | ||
| Delta T3T4 ↓ | Delta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | Alpha F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | ||||
| Theta T3T4 ↓ | Theta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | |||||
| Alpha T3T4 ↓ | Alpha F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | |||||
| LG, f | ||||||
| 55 y.o. | Delta F3F4 ↑ | Delta T3T4 ↓ | F3T3 ↑ | F3T3 ↑ | ||
| Delta F3F4 ≠ T3T4 | ||||||
Table 2. Shows statistically significant coherence changes in each sleep stage (Stage N2; stage N3 and REM, rapid eye movements). Delta, theta and alpha bands intra-hemispheric coherence (F3-T3 and F4-T4) and inter-hemispheric coherence (F3-F4 and T3-T4) are compared during silent and sound stimulation. Also sleep spindles in stage N2 (13–16 Hz) were analyzed. ↑ and ↓, coherence increments and decrements during sound stimulation. ≠, when appeared differences between inter-hemispheric or intra-hemispheric coherences with stimulation, while they did not appeared in the “Control” situation. Only statistical significant changes are shown. Data were statistically analyzed by non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) and post hoc Dunn׳s Multiple Comparisons test.
Fig. 3Overall coherence percentages in patient E.C. with monaural stimulation (right side). Overall coherence percentages were analyzed in intra-hemispheric electrodes (F3-T3 and F4-T4) and inter-hemispheric electrodes (F3-F4 and T3-T4) during stage N2, N3 and REM sleep. Insets, coherence of frequencies that make up the sleep spindles in stage N2 (13–16 Hz) were also studied. Bars show mean±Standard Deviation. Data were statistically analyzed by non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) and post hoc Dunn׳s Multiple Comparisons test, *p<0,05, **p<0,01.