Literature DB >> 20619332

Acoustic stimulation treatments against tinnitus could be most effective when tinnitus pitch is within the stimulated frequency range.

Roland Schaette1, Ovidiu König, Dirk Hornig, Manfred Gross, Richard Kempter.   

Abstract

Acoustic stimulation with hearing aids or noise devices is frequently used in tinnitus therapy. However, such behind-the-ear devices are limited in their high-frequency output with an upper cut-off frequency of approximately 5-6 kHz. Theoretical modeling suggests that acoustic stimulation treatments with these devices might be most effective when the tinnitus pitch is within the stimulated frequency range. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a pilot study with 15 subjects with chronic tinnitus. Eleven subjects received hearing aids and four subjects noise devices. Perceived tinnitus loudness was measured using a visual analog scale, and tinnitus-related distress was assessed using the Tinnitus Questionnaire. After six months of device usage, reductions of perceived tinnitus loudness were seen only in subjects with a tinnitus pitch of less than 6 kHz. When subjects were grouped by tinnitus pitch, the group of patients with a tinnitus pitch of less than 6 kHz (n = 10 subjects) showed a significant reduction in perceived tinnitus loudness (from 73.4 +/- 6.1 before to 56.4 +/- 7.4 after treatment, p = 0.012), whereas in subjects with a tinnitus pitch of 6 kHz or more (n = 5 subjects) tinnitus loudness was slightly increased after six months of treatment (65.0 +/- 4.7 before and 70.6 +/- 5.9 after treatment), but the increase was not significant (p = 0.063). Likewise, tinnitus-related distress was significantly decreased in the low-pitch group (from 31.6 +/- 4.3 to 20.9 +/- 4.8, p = 0.0059), but not in the group with high-pitched tinnitus (30.2 +/- 3.3 before and 30.0 +/- 5.1 after treatment, p = 1). Overall, reductions in tinnitus-related distress in our study were less pronounced than those reported for more comprehensive treatments. However, the differences we observed between the low- and the high-pitch group show that tinnitus pitch might influence the outcome of acoustic stimulation treatments when devices with a limited frequency range are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619332     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  27 in total

1.  Tinnitus Management in Lateral Skull Base Lesions.

Authors:  Juan San Juan; Gregory J Basura
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 3.  Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus--triggers, mechanisms and treatment.

Authors:  Susan E Shore; Larry E Roberts; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Prognostic and influencing factors of tinnitus in chronic otitis media after tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Ping Guo; Wenfang Sun; Wuqing Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: a proposal for an international standard.

Authors:  Michael Landgrebe; Andréia Azevedo; David Baguley; Carol Bauer; Anthony Cacace; Claudia Coelho; John Dornhoffer; Ricardo Figueiredo; Herta Flor; Goeran Hajak; Paul van de Heyning; Wolfgang Hiller; Eman Khedr; Tobias Kleinjung; Michael Koller; Jose Miguel Lainez; Alain Londero; William H Martin; Mark Mennemeier; Jay Piccirillo; Dirk De Ridder; Rainer Rupprecht; Grant Searchfield; Sven Vanneste; Florian Zeman; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Intracortical circuits amplify sound-evoked activity in primary auditory cortex following systemic injection of salicylate in the rat.

Authors:  Daniel Stolzberg; Michael Chrostowski; Richard J Salvi; Brian L Allman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Chronic tinnitus: an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Peter M Kreuzer; Veronika Vielsmeier; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  The relationship between tinnitus pitch and hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh Shekhawat; Grant D Searchfield; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Amplitude Modulated Noise for Tinnitus Suppression in Tonal and Noise-Like Tinnitus.

Authors:  Stefan Schoisswohl; Johannes Arnds; Martin Schecklmann; Berthold Langguth; Winfried Schlee; Patrick Neff
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Reversible induction of phantom auditory sensations through simulated unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Roland Schaette; Charlotte Turtle; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.